UN estimations are >5000 people killed, amongst them dozens of children (who nobody with a sane mind can call 'oppositiion fighters')
(Comm. Parrisson, 10 February 2012 17:56)
Pray based on what sources? The 'opposition'. Being a parrot and swallowing unquestioningly such figures gains you no credit in light of all the previous lies pumped out by the usual suspects in the run up to military intervention.
NATO had go beyond on its UN mandate to protect the Libyan civilians from attacks from Khadaffi forces. but acted instead as the "Air Force" of the Libyan opposition.
This time Russia and China voted against the UN resolution on Syria coz they know NATO will repeat the same action they did on Libya.
You croats are also good at murdering women and kids and your American friends suite each other. You were nothing without the Nazis and you will be nothing again when your American friends go back behind thier stockade you can put the rest to your imagination.
You said that nobody with a sane mind would kill children.....here's a little bit of news for you my friend.....the Americans kill kids every week in Pakistan and Afghanistan yet I don't see their media reporting that to it citizens. Certain US units also sport ss insignia on operations and that is fact so what does that tell you, you are living in cloud cuckoo land pal!!!
Who are you kidding pal, the US are responsible for a hell of a lot more than 5,000 over the past decades and still the numbers are rising. You ought to pull your head out of the sand and smell the coffee and stop blaming the Russians, the Americans are not squeaky clean as some people would like to believe, they are the real enemy period!!
"How many innocent people have been killed in Syria by weapons supplied by the USA to the opposition factions??"
(Steve Gligorijevic, 10 February 2012 15:00)
There might be some, but surely much less than the amount of innocent people killed by Syrian forces with weapons supplied by Russia. UN estimations are >5000 people killed, amongst them dozens of children (who nobody with a sane mind can call 'oppositiion fighters')
(Comm. Parrisson, 10 February 2012 17:56)
Some people have bad habit of using children as human shield.
I say we go in their and clear the den of Bashar-al thieves and cutthroats it would fall in days. The Syrian population would welcome us as liberators from the criminal gang of murderous thugs. Croatian troops http://www.vidoevo.com/yvideo.php?i=VnlnLWxxcWuRpSDdZZE0&croatian-army-natokforomltisaf are already on the Syrian Israeli border 3 prong liberation by air land and sea stop pussy footing get the job done.
"How many innocent people have been killed in Syria by weapons supplied by the USA to the opposition factions??"
(Steve Gligorijevic, 10 February 2012 15:00)
There might be some, but surely much less than the amount of innocent people killed by Syrian forces with weapons supplied by Russia. UN estimations are >5000 people killed, amongst them dozens of children (who nobody with a sane mind can call 'oppositiion fighters')
Arms have already and are still getting into Syria from Western countries, the main supplier being the USA. British special forces are operating inside Syria also so to say NATO is not going to get involved is a lie, they already are involved and if we dig deeper we'll see that the USA's CIA are very much involved in the destabilisation of that country as they have been in others.
We are bombarded everyday particularly in the biased Western media of pictures of dead and wounded children in Syria at the hands of government forces, yet innocent men women and children are dying each day at the hands of NATO forces in Pakistan and Afghanistan, yet the BBC and ITV news networks in the UK fail to mention any of these atrocities committed upon those people. How many innocent people have been killed in Syria by weapons supplied by the USA to the opposition factions?? come on readers this is a two sided conflict and people are dying on both sides but the finger of blame is pointing to only one which the Western media are expert at doing.
I agree with you 100%, NATO with the USA in the lead are the biggest terror organisation upon this planet, it is sad that many refuse to see this fact. All the atrocities committed by this organiation are covered up and are not reported by the Western media. What was done to former Yugoslavia was an evil comparable to Nazi German aggression.
We see the same one sided bias against the government in Syria, yet many wrongs and atrocities have been committed against the government side also. I do not condone any act of violence from any side but NATO and the West have a lot to hide and they have no room to talk or point the finger of condemnation to anyone. I would hang my head in shame if I was a newsreader for the BBC or ITV news networks, as I have already said they are expert at propoganda and demonising a particular regime they do not like.
I believe it’s the first more or less peaceful statement made in the West lately. Sure the coming Presidential in the USA is a big motivator. So Obama has a temptation of a small Blitz Krieg to shut the Republicans mouths up. But this time he is not sure of the result. As one of the most informed man on this planet Obama must has reasons to be cautious despite the coming elections.
Two days ago Pakistan ( which never makes radical steps without China ) said it will provide Iran with any help required. Yesterday Churkin told Qatar’s Ambassador to the UN that this state “may not live till tomorrow”. Today Iran sent 15 000 of it’s special forces to help Syria. They are tied with a military pact and who knows will it be 15 000 or 150 000 … Clinton and Obama Sarkozy and other “friends of Syria” are in vain trying to phone their Russian counterparts.
Russian Parliament made a firm pro-Syrian statement and the officials said that Russia will keep on arming Iran and Syria. So the Yugoslavian or Libyan scenario is merely possible here. This is why Rasmussen who ( as the spokesman of the Pentagon) is not supposed to have a private point of view has stopped to aggravate the situation. They know something we can only speculate. But who can stop the West if not us ?
O really...but they (Nato) were ready in a heart beat to come in and bombard the former Yugoslavia because the Yugoslav Army was protecting Serbs who were being butchered in villages around Srebrenica by Nasir Oric and his thugs. Clinton once told Nasir Oric and I quote "if you want us to intervene I need to see 5000 dead Muslims" Nasir Oric was all but accepting" of this because he knew by starting a war against Serbs in Bosna the Yugoslav army had to intervene to protect the Serbian populace and when this happened the US had their propaganda story ready for why they had to intervene.
Not to mention what Nato's bombarment did to the Serbian province of Kosovo after Milosevic had to send in the army to protect fellow Serbs in what the murderous (along with what the USA deemed a terrorist organization) Thaci KLA regime was doing to innocent Serbs. They used plutonium tip weaponery to kill innocent people in turn this (which is illegal---by international law) has polluted and poisoned Kosovo for the next 1000 years.
It seems that NATO picks and chooses its battles depending on how it aligns with US foreign policy.
Whenever the US and its allies has no more use from their political friends ie: Mubarek (Egypt), Libya (Ghaddafi), Syria (Assad), Iraq (Saddam), Bin Laden (Former CIA agent paid by the US to fight against the Russians) and many more they seek regime change. All of the conflicts that are currently commenincing in the middle east is because the USA and the CIA had created these conflicts for their interests. Yes, again its because of oil and to control the ports and distribution channels.
The US along with Nato are the root cause of all evil in this world.
However, in this case Nato has more concerns and face a greater fear from Russia and China. They are much stronger now than in the last 15-20 years. Their influence is greater and this is what NATO and the US has feared all along. They no longer can go over the heads of Russia and China without the fear of reprecautions.
NATO Secretary General Andres Fogh Rasmussen says the western military alliance would not meddle in the months-long political crisis in Syria. You mean like you did in Libya, Rasmussen, and countless other places in the world? Is it maybe because it's an election year in the USA, and Obama ordering NATO intervention in Syria may cost him some votes from the liberal anti-war crowd? You guys at NATO fool no one, you are savage hawks of the worst kind.
O really...but they (Nato) were ready in a heart beat to come in and bombard the former Yugoslavia because the Yugoslav Army was protecting Serbs who were being butchered in villages around Srebrenica by Nasir Oric and his thugs. Clinton once told Nasir Oric and I quote "if you want us to intervene I need to see 5000 dead Muslims" Nasir Oric was all but accepting" of this because he knew by starting a war against Serbs in Bosna the Yugoslav army had to intervene to protect the Serbian populace and when this happened the US had their propaganda story ready for why they had to intervene.
Not to mention what Nato's bombarment did to the Serbian province of Kosovo after Milosevic had to send in the army to protect fellow Serbs in what the murderous (along with what the USA deemed a terrorist organization) Thaci KLA regime was doing to innocent Serbs. They used plutonium tip weaponery to kill innocent people in turn this (which is illegal---by international law) has polluted and poisoned Kosovo for the next 1000 years.
It seems that NATO picks and chooses its battles depending on how it aligns with US foreign policy.
Whenever the US and its allies has no more use from their political friends ie: Mubarek (Egypt), Libya (Ghaddafi), Syria (Assad), Iraq (Saddam), Bin Laden (Former CIA agent paid by the US to fight against the Russians) and many more they seek regime change. All of the conflicts that are currently commenincing in the middle east is because the USA and the CIA had created these conflicts for their interests. Yes, again its because of oil and to control the ports and distribution channels.
The US along with Nato are the root cause of all evil in this world.
However, in this case Nato has more concerns and face a greater fear from Russia and China. They are much stronger now than in the last 15-20 years. Their influence is greater and this is what NATO and the US has feared all along. They no longer can go over the heads of Russia and China without the fear of reprecautions.
Arms have already and are still getting into Syria from Western countries, the main supplier being the USA. British special forces are operating inside Syria also so to say NATO is not going to get involved is a lie, they already are involved and if we dig deeper we'll see that the USA's CIA are very much involved in the destabilisation of that country as they have been in others.
We are bombarded everyday particularly in the biased Western media of pictures of dead and wounded children in Syria at the hands of government forces, yet innocent men women and children are dying each day at the hands of NATO forces in Pakistan and Afghanistan, yet the BBC and ITV news networks in the UK fail to mention any of these atrocities committed upon those people. How many innocent people have been killed in Syria by weapons supplied by the USA to the opposition factions?? come on readers this is a two sided conflict and people are dying on both sides but the finger of blame is pointing to only one which the Western media are expert at doing.
NATO Secretary General Andres Fogh Rasmussen says the western military alliance would not meddle in the months-long political crisis in Syria. You mean like you did in Libya, Rasmussen, and countless other places in the world? Is it maybe because it's an election year in the USA, and Obama ordering NATO intervention in Syria may cost him some votes from the liberal anti-war crowd? You guys at NATO fool no one, you are savage hawks of the worst kind.
I say we go in their and clear the den of Bashar-al thieves and cutthroats it would fall in days. The Syrian population would welcome us as liberators from the criminal gang of murderous thugs. Croatian troops http://www.vidoevo.com/yvideo.php?i=VnlnLWxxcWuRpSDdZZE0&croatian-army-natokforomltisaf are already on the Syrian Israeli border 3 prong liberation by air land and sea stop pussy footing get the job done.
I agree with you 100%, NATO with the USA in the lead are the biggest terror organisation upon this planet, it is sad that many refuse to see this fact. All the atrocities committed by this organiation are covered up and are not reported by the Western media. What was done to former Yugoslavia was an evil comparable to Nazi German aggression.
We see the same one sided bias against the government in Syria, yet many wrongs and atrocities have been committed against the government side also. I do not condone any act of violence from any side but NATO and the West have a lot to hide and they have no room to talk or point the finger of condemnation to anyone. I would hang my head in shame if I was a newsreader for the BBC or ITV news networks, as I have already said they are expert at propoganda and demonising a particular regime they do not like.
"How many innocent people have been killed in Syria by weapons supplied by the USA to the opposition factions??"
(Steve Gligorijevic, 10 February 2012 15:00)
There might be some, but surely much less than the amount of innocent people killed by Syrian forces with weapons supplied by Russia. UN estimations are >5000 people killed, amongst them dozens of children (who nobody with a sane mind can call 'oppositiion fighters')
"How many innocent people have been killed in Syria by weapons supplied by the USA to the opposition factions??"
(Steve Gligorijevic, 10 February 2012 15:00)
There might be some, but surely much less than the amount of innocent people killed by Syrian forces with weapons supplied by Russia. UN estimations are >5000 people killed, amongst them dozens of children (who nobody with a sane mind can call 'oppositiion fighters')
(Comm. Parrisson, 10 February 2012 17:56)
Some people have bad habit of using children as human shield.
I believe it’s the first more or less peaceful statement made in the West lately. Sure the coming Presidential in the USA is a big motivator. So Obama has a temptation of a small Blitz Krieg to shut the Republicans mouths up. But this time he is not sure of the result. As one of the most informed man on this planet Obama must has reasons to be cautious despite the coming elections.
Two days ago Pakistan ( which never makes radical steps without China ) said it will provide Iran with any help required. Yesterday Churkin told Qatar’s Ambassador to the UN that this state “may not live till tomorrow”. Today Iran sent 15 000 of it’s special forces to help Syria. They are tied with a military pact and who knows will it be 15 000 or 150 000 … Clinton and Obama Sarkozy and other “friends of Syria” are in vain trying to phone their Russian counterparts.
Russian Parliament made a firm pro-Syrian statement and the officials said that Russia will keep on arming Iran and Syria. So the Yugoslavian or Libyan scenario is merely possible here. This is why Rasmussen who ( as the spokesman of the Pentagon) is not supposed to have a private point of view has stopped to aggravate the situation. They know something we can only speculate. But who can stop the West if not us ?
You croats are also good at murdering women and kids and your American friends suite each other. You were nothing without the Nazis and you will be nothing again when your American friends go back behind thier stockade you can put the rest to your imagination.
NATO had go beyond on its UN mandate to protect the Libyan civilians from attacks from Khadaffi forces. but acted instead as the "Air Force" of the Libyan opposition.
This time Russia and China voted against the UN resolution on Syria coz they know NATO will repeat the same action they did on Libya.
Who are you kidding pal, the US are responsible for a hell of a lot more than 5,000 over the past decades and still the numbers are rising. You ought to pull your head out of the sand and smell the coffee and stop blaming the Russians, the Americans are not squeaky clean as some people would like to believe, they are the real enemy period!!
You said that nobody with a sane mind would kill children.....here's a little bit of news for you my friend.....the Americans kill kids every week in Pakistan and Afghanistan yet I don't see their media reporting that to it citizens. Certain US units also sport ss insignia on operations and that is fact so what does that tell you, you are living in cloud cuckoo land pal!!!
UN estimations are >5000 people killed, amongst them dozens of children (who nobody with a sane mind can call 'oppositiion fighters')
(Comm. Parrisson, 10 February 2012 17:56)
Pray based on what sources? The 'opposition'. Being a parrot and swallowing unquestioningly such figures gains you no credit in light of all the previous lies pumped out by the usual suspects in the run up to military intervention.
I say we go in their and clear the den of Bashar-al thieves and cutthroats it would fall in days. The Syrian population would welcome us as liberators from the criminal gang of murderous thugs. Croatian troops http://www.vidoevo.com/yvideo.php?i=VnlnLWxxcWuRpSDdZZE0&croatian-army-natokforomltisaf are already on the Syrian Israeli border 3 prong liberation by air land and sea stop pussy footing get the job done.
"How many innocent people have been killed in Syria by weapons supplied by the USA to the opposition factions??"
(Steve Gligorijevic, 10 February 2012 15:00)
There might be some, but surely much less than the amount of innocent people killed by Syrian forces with weapons supplied by Russia. UN estimations are >5000 people killed, amongst them dozens of children (who nobody with a sane mind can call 'oppositiion fighters')
"How many innocent people have been killed in Syria by weapons supplied by the USA to the opposition factions??"
(Steve Gligorijevic, 10 February 2012 15:00)
There might be some, but surely much less than the amount of innocent people killed by Syrian forces with weapons supplied by Russia. UN estimations are >5000 people killed, amongst them dozens of children (who nobody with a sane mind can call 'oppositiion fighters')
(Comm. Parrisson, 10 February 2012 17:56)
Some people have bad habit of using children as human shield.
I believe it’s the first more or less peaceful statement made in the West lately. Sure the coming Presidential in the USA is a big motivator. So Obama has a temptation of a small Blitz Krieg to shut the Republicans mouths up. But this time he is not sure of the result. As one of the most informed man on this planet Obama must has reasons to be cautious despite the coming elections.
Two days ago Pakistan ( which never makes radical steps without China ) said it will provide Iran with any help required. Yesterday Churkin told Qatar’s Ambassador to the UN that this state “may not live till tomorrow”. Today Iran sent 15 000 of it’s special forces to help Syria. They are tied with a military pact and who knows will it be 15 000 or 150 000 … Clinton and Obama Sarkozy and other “friends of Syria” are in vain trying to phone their Russian counterparts.
Russian Parliament made a firm pro-Syrian statement and the officials said that Russia will keep on arming Iran and Syria. So the Yugoslavian or Libyan scenario is merely possible here. This is why Rasmussen who ( as the spokesman of the Pentagon) is not supposed to have a private point of view has stopped to aggravate the situation. They know something we can only speculate. But who can stop the West if not us ?
NATO Secretary General Andres Fogh Rasmussen says the western military alliance would not meddle in the months-long political crisis in Syria. You mean like you did in Libya, Rasmussen, and countless other places in the world? Is it maybe because it's an election year in the USA, and Obama ordering NATO intervention in Syria may cost him some votes from the liberal anti-war crowd? You guys at NATO fool no one, you are savage hawks of the worst kind.
Arms have already and are still getting into Syria from Western countries, the main supplier being the USA. British special forces are operating inside Syria also so to say NATO is not going to get involved is a lie, they already are involved and if we dig deeper we'll see that the USA's CIA are very much involved in the destabilisation of that country as they have been in others.
We are bombarded everyday particularly in the biased Western media of pictures of dead and wounded children in Syria at the hands of government forces, yet innocent men women and children are dying each day at the hands of NATO forces in Pakistan and Afghanistan, yet the BBC and ITV news networks in the UK fail to mention any of these atrocities committed upon those people. How many innocent people have been killed in Syria by weapons supplied by the USA to the opposition factions?? come on readers this is a two sided conflict and people are dying on both sides but the finger of blame is pointing to only one which the Western media are expert at doing.
O really...but they (Nato) were ready in a heart beat to come in and bombard the former Yugoslavia because the Yugoslav Army was protecting Serbs who were being butchered in villages around Srebrenica by Nasir Oric and his thugs. Clinton once told Nasir Oric and I quote "if you want us to intervene I need to see 5000 dead Muslims" Nasir Oric was all but accepting" of this because he knew by starting a war against Serbs in Bosna the Yugoslav army had to intervene to protect the Serbian populace and when this happened the US had their propaganda story ready for why they had to intervene.
Not to mention what Nato's bombarment did to the Serbian province of Kosovo after Milosevic had to send in the army to protect fellow Serbs in what the murderous (along with what the USA deemed a terrorist organization) Thaci KLA regime was doing to innocent Serbs. They used plutonium tip weaponery to kill innocent people in turn this (which is illegal---by international law) has polluted and poisoned Kosovo for the next 1000 years.
It seems that NATO picks and chooses its battles depending on how it aligns with US foreign policy.
Whenever the US and its allies has no more use from their political friends ie: Mubarek (Egypt), Libya (Ghaddafi), Syria (Assad), Iraq (Saddam), Bin Laden (Former CIA agent paid by the US to fight against the Russians) and many more they seek regime change. All of the conflicts that are currently commenincing in the middle east is because the USA and the CIA had created these conflicts for their interests. Yes, again its because of oil and to control the ports and distribution channels.
The US along with Nato are the root cause of all evil in this world.
However, in this case Nato has more concerns and face a greater fear from Russia and China. They are much stronger now than in the last 15-20 years. Their influence is greater and this is what NATO and the US has feared all along. They no longer can go over the heads of Russia and China without the fear of reprecautions.
I agree with you 100%, NATO with the USA in the lead are the biggest terror organisation upon this planet, it is sad that many refuse to see this fact. All the atrocities committed by this organiation are covered up and are not reported by the Western media. What was done to former Yugoslavia was an evil comparable to Nazi German aggression.
We see the same one sided bias against the government in Syria, yet many wrongs and atrocities have been committed against the government side also. I do not condone any act of violence from any side but NATO and the West have a lot to hide and they have no room to talk or point the finger of condemnation to anyone. I would hang my head in shame if I was a newsreader for the BBC or ITV news networks, as I have already said they are expert at propoganda and demonising a particular regime they do not like.
You croats are also good at murdering women and kids and your American friends suite each other. You were nothing without the Nazis and you will be nothing again when your American friends go back behind thier stockade you can put the rest to your imagination.
You said that nobody with a sane mind would kill children.....here's a little bit of news for you my friend.....the Americans kill kids every week in Pakistan and Afghanistan yet I don't see their media reporting that to it citizens. Certain US units also sport ss insignia on operations and that is fact so what does that tell you, you are living in cloud cuckoo land pal!!!
Who are you kidding pal, the US are responsible for a hell of a lot more than 5,000 over the past decades and still the numbers are rising. You ought to pull your head out of the sand and smell the coffee and stop blaming the Russians, the Americans are not squeaky clean as some people would like to believe, they are the real enemy period!!
UN estimations are >5000 people killed, amongst them dozens of children (who nobody with a sane mind can call 'oppositiion fighters')
(Comm. Parrisson, 10 February 2012 17:56)
Pray based on what sources? The 'opposition'. Being a parrot and swallowing unquestioningly such figures gains you no credit in light of all the previous lies pumped out by the usual suspects in the run up to military intervention.
NATO had go beyond on its UN mandate to protect the Libyan civilians from attacks from Khadaffi forces. but acted instead as the "Air Force" of the Libyan opposition.
This time Russia and China voted against the UN resolution on Syria coz they know NATO will repeat the same action they did on Libya.
IMAGE SOURCE
18 Komentari
Sortiraj po: