UN: Syrian death toll exceeds 5,400

How funny. We were told over a month ago that '7,000' people had been killed. All the media reported it so it must have been true. Clearly the same type of biased idiots who reported the mass inflated figures for Bosnia (200,00 bosniaks) and Kosovo (100,000). Anybody apologize for lying?

As for the GCC, they are hardly better than Syria. How soon their turn or do they have to stop buying western weapons and selling oil first?

If Bashir Al-Asaad is such a liability than he ought to be ousted from power.

"Clearly the same type of biased idiots who reported the mass inflated figures for Bosnia (200,00 bosniaks) and Kosovo (100,000). Anybody apologize for lying?"
(EU Dude, 26 January 2012 17:49)

The estimations for Bosnia have been 200,000 casualties (in sum, not only Bosniaks). The documented, verified number of victims (so far) are 'only' about 100,000.

From wikipedia: "The research has shown that most of the 97,207[103] documented casualties (civilians and soldiers) during Bosnian War were Bosniaks (66 per cent), followed by Serbs (25 per cent), Croats (8 per cent) and a small number of others such as Albanians or Romani people.[104] Bosniaks also suffered massive civilian casualties (83 per cent) compared to Serbs (10 per cent) and Croats (5 per cent). At least 30 per cent of the Bosniak civilian victims were women and children.[105]"

Since there's some dark figures, so the real number of victims is surely higher. So, for Syria, if there are 'only' 2500 people killed, maybe 80% (2000) of them by soldiers of the Assad regime, does it make it any better?

How funny. We were told over a month ago that '7,000' people had been killed. All the media reported it so it must have been true. Clearly the same type of biased idiots who reported the mass inflated figures for Bosnia (200,00 bosniaks) and Kosovo (100,000). Anybody apologize for lying?

As for the GCC, they are hardly better than Syria. How soon their turn or do they have to stop buying western weapons and selling oil first?

If Bashir Al-Asaad is such a liability than he ought to be ousted from power.

"Clearly the same type of biased idiots who reported the mass inflated figures for Bosnia (200,00 bosniaks) and Kosovo (100,000). Anybody apologize for lying?"
(EU Dude, 26 January 2012 17:49)

The estimations for Bosnia have been 200,000 casualties (in sum, not only Bosniaks). The documented, verified number of victims (so far) are 'only' about 100,000.

From wikipedia: "The research has shown that most of the 97,207[103] documented casualties (civilians and soldiers) during Bosnian War were Bosniaks (66 per cent), followed by Serbs (25 per cent), Croats (8 per cent) and a small number of others such as Albanians or Romani people.[104] Bosniaks also suffered massive civilian casualties (83 per cent) compared to Serbs (10 per cent) and Croats (5 per cent). At least 30 per cent of the Bosniak civilian victims were women and children.[105]"

Since there's some dark figures, so the real number of victims is surely higher. So, for Syria, if there are 'only' 2500 people killed, maybe 80% (2000) of them by soldiers of the Assad regime, does it make it any better?