U.S. to pull 7,000 troops from Europe

This is just the begining, and shows that the influence and growing popularity of Ron Paul is having an effect already. They are going ot have to bring ALL of their troops home, because the US of A is effectively bankrupt.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Da6irSCvnZY
Cheers!!!

(USA United States of Albania, 13 January 2012 16:47)

Your post was very humorous, and thanks for the entertainment. Not one bit of reality in it.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/13/opinion/welch-paul-libertarianism/
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kVrrhc6Xr4

Your future does not look bright my albanian friend...lol. Times have changed. Keep your head in the sand and pretend like the debt doesn't matter if it makes you feel better. Remember though, all empires collapse because of debt.
Cheers!!

http://www.federalbudget.com/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/9012102/Obama-seeks-to-raise-US-debt-limit-by-1.2-trillion.html

Ron Paul is a fool. He doesn't even command a fraction of the support of US Voters. I'm not sure where you're associating pulling out troops with Ron Paul and his ideas? The USA will never be bankrupt. We will always have an amazing military ready to go wherever they have to go. The USA has done more in 250 years than Serbia in its entire existence. That doesn't happen by being stupid and making the wrong decisions. Sure, the USA has made some bad decisions, but they learn from it and fix it. That's the case with any country minus Serbia because Serbia continually makes bad decisions and repeats them over and over and over. Its a little premature to boast about the USA being "bankrupt", but if it makes you feel better....
(USA United States of Albania, 13 January 2012 16:47)

Really? You don't see why Ron Paul is mentioned when discussing pulling out troops? You must not have any knowledge of his policies. He has the largest support from troops for a reason. I think you just hate him because of his views on Kosovo. Actually, I can guarantee that's why.

"That's the case with any country minus Serbia"

HAHA and what great things has Albania accomplished? Besides stealing business from Don Pablo aka Pablo Escobar.

Actually the US is technically bankrupt. Obama has requested another 1.2 trillion dollar raise in the debt ceiling.The US government often shuts down for days when these ceilings are not raised because the US is "out of money" or bankrupt. Our creditworthiness was downgraded last year. It is Obama, not Ron Paul, who is cutting troops in Europe and no American really cares. America's wars usually backfire. Americans are sick and tired of endless Albanian and Bosnian Islamic terrorism and have no intention of being tricked into fighting their wars again. The deviants in the US State Dept. and the daily downgraded EU that are always trying to destroy your independence and culture don't have the money or troops to defeat you anymore if you choose to resist.

This is just the begining, and shows that the influence and growing popularity of Ron Paul is having an effect already. They are going ot have to bring ALL of their troops home, because the US of A is effectively bankrupt.
[link]
Cheers!!!
(Dragan, 13 January 2012 16:12)

Ron Paul is a fool. He doesn't even command a fraction of the support of US Voters. I'm not sure where you're associating pulling out troops with Ron Paul and his ideas? The USA will never be bankrupt. We will always have an amazing military ready to go wherever they have to go. The USA has done more in 250 years than Serbia in its entire existence. That doesn't happen by being stupid and making the wrong decisions. Sure, the USA has made some bad decisions, but they learn from it and fix it. That's the case with any country minus Serbia because Serbia continually makes bad decisions and repeats them over and over and over. Its a little premature to boast about the USA being "bankrupt", but if it makes you feel better....

It's more likely that RuPaul will be next US president than Ron Paul

With the modern weapons only the USA has, it is not necessary to have as many troops in Europe as before. It is just that simple. Furthermore, Western Europe, particularly Germany, has more than an adequate number of highly trained troops to protect against any Russian threat. Also, the USA spends less by far, percentage wise, of its budget on the military than any other country. Some Serbs on this forum are constantly grasping at straws by trying to put a negative spin on America's superior military might. But, just look at what damage was caused to Serbia with only very light humanitarian bombing. The USA didn't even have to put one American soldier on the ground during the 1999 whipping of Serbia. When use of NATO ground troops was mentioned, Serbia rolled over and sued for peace.
(The Count of Kosova, 14 January 2012 05:27)

Where are those superior weapons? The US has left Iraq defeated and in the process of leaving Afghanistan defeated so where are those superior weapons?
Comment like “Germany, has more than an adequate number of highly trained troops to protect against any Russian threat” tell us how naïve you are. NATO is a group which is composed of each country bringing some type of equipment or trained personnel to the group – the US was the only one that could have carried out a war without NATO.
The Germans could not stop a cranky grandmother on their own.
Now when the US is so superior to all the rest then why would they have 19 countries attack a small nation of only 10 million? Surely the US superiority would have been enough to scare them?
On the issue of ground troops the US just relied on bombing as the losses would have been too high. The Russians owed Serbia about 1 billion and had they supplied Serbia with S300s then you superior forces would have been history. Has it even in your small mind occurred why a superior military machine like the US constantly only attacks small and defenseless countries?
Albanian BS at its best.

"It's more likely that RuPaul will be next US president than Ron Paul
J.Oker"

That was the funniest thing all day on this forum! How can anyone give you thumbs down?

Ron Paul has some good ideas. Then, he has some crazy ideas. Seselj has a better chance of getting out of jail than Paul of becoming president.
(metrod, 13 January 2012 23:09)

A Very high chance then?

Ron Paul has some good ideas. Then, he has some crazy ideas. Seselj has a better chance of getting out of jail than Paul of becoming president.
(metrod, 13 January 2012 23:09)

Ron Paul is extremely sound, that is why he has much of the youth and elderly vote and suprise minimal media exposure. He is not a "Christian crazy" or "war monger" so he misses out on some votes. Overall he understands that the USA is being indebted to fight wars of control for corporation profit and while it does that the USA is controlled by debt. Imagine having billions upon billions in stimulis aid going to produce nothing or to be circulated into an economy but instead lining the profits of black hole business and banking. Thats called killing two birds with one stone. Is it "crazy" for seeing that and calling to rectify this situation? Your opinions sound like muppet responses more and more with every post.

I Quote -

The withdrawal is part of a 10-year defense strategy that U.S. President Barack Obama presented on January 5, giving strategic priority to the Asia-Pacific and Middle East regions.

Comment.

Rhe US will lose all influense in the Far East as well as the Middle East.

Saudi-Arabia has seen the wery Sloth stance the US has taken against Iran and dont trust the US any longer.

The Idiot Clinton was the one that gave North-Korea their Nuclear Capability and this conflict will eventually force the US out of the Far East.

BY-BY-Yanks.

"It's more likely that RuPaul will be next US president than Ron Paul
J.Oker"

That was the funniest thing all day on this forum! How can anyone give you thumbs down?

Ron Paul has some good ideas. Then, he has some crazy ideas. Seselj has a better chance of getting out of jail than Paul of becoming president.

With the modern weapons only the USA has, it is not necessary to have as many troops in Europe as before. It is just that simple. Furthermore, Western Europe, particularly Germany, has more than an adequate number of highly trained troops to protect against any Russian threat. Also, the USA spends less by far, percentage wise, of its budget on the military than any other country. Some Serbs on this forum are constantly grasping at straws by trying to put a negative spin on America's superior military might. But, just look at what damage was caused to Serbia with only very light humanitarian bombing. The USA didn't even have to put one American soldier on the ground during the 1999 whipping of Serbia. When use of NATO ground troops was mentioned, Serbia rolled over and sued for peace.

On the issue of ground troops the US just relied on bombing as the losses would have been too high. The Russians owed Serbia about 1 billion and had they supplied Serbia with S300s then you superior forces would have been history. Has it even in your small mind occurred why a superior military machine like the US constantly only attacks small and defenseless countries?
Albanian BS at its best.
(sj, 14 January 2012 21:30)
IF only!!! You could change a lot of history with those words IF only....
But if only Serbia had more advanced weaponry, NATO would have used more than it did. IF only Serbia would have had more and better trained troops, NATO would have brought in more.
The thing you seem to conveniently forget is NATO did not bring in but a fraction of its resources, they brought in what they felt they needed to make the campaign end quickly and with as little loss as possible.
You criticize the use of bombing vs ground troops. Does it sound smart to you to plan a campaign say with the goal to force the withdrawal of of YUGO forces from Kosovo and then say but lets use ground troops that way we can have more casualties to our forces. This was not a war game to see who was the best, this was a comapaign to stop the killing and violence.
But there are those sitting in little pubs who cannot face reality so they look into the bottom of their empty shot glass and say "IF only"...

By the way Serbia would be in a lot better shape today IF only Russia were to repay that 1 billion now (without strings).

I think all these small and defenseless countries you are talking about have all been agressive to someone more defenseless and all hav proclaimed that they would crush the US should they try.

This is just the begining, and shows that the influence and growing popularity of Ron Paul is having an effect already. They are going ot have to bring ALL of their troops home, because the US of A is effectively bankrupt.
[link]
Cheers!!!
(Dragan, 13 January 2012 16:12)

Ron Paul is a fool. He doesn't even command a fraction of the support of US Voters. I'm not sure where you're associating pulling out troops with Ron Paul and his ideas? The USA will never be bankrupt. We will always have an amazing military ready to go wherever they have to go. The USA has done more in 250 years than Serbia in its entire existence. That doesn't happen by being stupid and making the wrong decisions. Sure, the USA has made some bad decisions, but they learn from it and fix it. That's the case with any country minus Serbia because Serbia continually makes bad decisions and repeats them over and over and over. Its a little premature to boast about the USA being "bankrupt", but if it makes you feel better....

It's more likely that RuPaul will be next US president than Ron Paul

"It's more likely that RuPaul will be next US president than Ron Paul
J.Oker"

That was the funniest thing all day on this forum! How can anyone give you thumbs down?

Ron Paul has some good ideas. Then, he has some crazy ideas. Seselj has a better chance of getting out of jail than Paul of becoming president.

This is just the begining, and shows that the influence and growing popularity of Ron Paul is having an effect already. They are going ot have to bring ALL of their troops home, because the US of A is effectively bankrupt.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Da6irSCvnZY
Cheers!!!

(USA United States of Albania, 13 January 2012 16:47)

Your post was very humorous, and thanks for the entertainment. Not one bit of reality in it.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/13/opinion/welch-paul-libertarianism/
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kVrrhc6Xr4

Your future does not look bright my albanian friend...lol. Times have changed. Keep your head in the sand and pretend like the debt doesn't matter if it makes you feel better. Remember though, all empires collapse because of debt.
Cheers!!

Ron Paul is a fool. He doesn't even command a fraction of the support of US Voters. I'm not sure where you're associating pulling out troops with Ron Paul and his ideas? The USA will never be bankrupt. We will always have an amazing military ready to go wherever they have to go. The USA has done more in 250 years than Serbia in its entire existence. That doesn't happen by being stupid and making the wrong decisions. Sure, the USA has made some bad decisions, but they learn from it and fix it. That's the case with any country minus Serbia because Serbia continually makes bad decisions and repeats them over and over and over. Its a little premature to boast about the USA being "bankrupt", but if it makes you feel better....
(USA United States of Albania, 13 January 2012 16:47)

Really? You don't see why Ron Paul is mentioned when discussing pulling out troops? You must not have any knowledge of his policies. He has the largest support from troops for a reason. I think you just hate him because of his views on Kosovo. Actually, I can guarantee that's why.

"That's the case with any country minus Serbia"

HAHA and what great things has Albania accomplished? Besides stealing business from Don Pablo aka Pablo Escobar.

Actually the US is technically bankrupt. Obama has requested another 1.2 trillion dollar raise in the debt ceiling.The US government often shuts down for days when these ceilings are not raised because the US is "out of money" or bankrupt. Our creditworthiness was downgraded last year. It is Obama, not Ron Paul, who is cutting troops in Europe and no American really cares. America's wars usually backfire. Americans are sick and tired of endless Albanian and Bosnian Islamic terrorism and have no intention of being tricked into fighting their wars again. The deviants in the US State Dept. and the daily downgraded EU that are always trying to destroy your independence and culture don't have the money or troops to defeat you anymore if you choose to resist.

With the modern weapons only the USA has, it is not necessary to have as many troops in Europe as before. It is just that simple. Furthermore, Western Europe, particularly Germany, has more than an adequate number of highly trained troops to protect against any Russian threat. Also, the USA spends less by far, percentage wise, of its budget on the military than any other country. Some Serbs on this forum are constantly grasping at straws by trying to put a negative spin on America's superior military might. But, just look at what damage was caused to Serbia with only very light humanitarian bombing. The USA didn't even have to put one American soldier on the ground during the 1999 whipping of Serbia. When use of NATO ground troops was mentioned, Serbia rolled over and sued for peace.

http://www.federalbudget.com/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/9012102/Obama-seeks-to-raise-US-debt-limit-by-1.2-trillion.html

On the issue of ground troops the US just relied on bombing as the losses would have been too high. The Russians owed Serbia about 1 billion and had they supplied Serbia with S300s then you superior forces would have been history. Has it even in your small mind occurred why a superior military machine like the US constantly only attacks small and defenseless countries?
Albanian BS at its best.
(sj, 14 January 2012 21:30)
IF only!!! You could change a lot of history with those words IF only....
But if only Serbia had more advanced weaponry, NATO would have used more than it did. IF only Serbia would have had more and better trained troops, NATO would have brought in more.
The thing you seem to conveniently forget is NATO did not bring in but a fraction of its resources, they brought in what they felt they needed to make the campaign end quickly and with as little loss as possible.
You criticize the use of bombing vs ground troops. Does it sound smart to you to plan a campaign say with the goal to force the withdrawal of of YUGO forces from Kosovo and then say but lets use ground troops that way we can have more casualties to our forces. This was not a war game to see who was the best, this was a comapaign to stop the killing and violence.
But there are those sitting in little pubs who cannot face reality so they look into the bottom of their empty shot glass and say "IF only"...

By the way Serbia would be in a lot better shape today IF only Russia were to repay that 1 billion now (without strings).

I think all these small and defenseless countries you are talking about have all been agressive to someone more defenseless and all hav proclaimed that they would crush the US should they try.

With the modern weapons only the USA has, it is not necessary to have as many troops in Europe as before. It is just that simple. Furthermore, Western Europe, particularly Germany, has more than an adequate number of highly trained troops to protect against any Russian threat. Also, the USA spends less by far, percentage wise, of its budget on the military than any other country. Some Serbs on this forum are constantly grasping at straws by trying to put a negative spin on America's superior military might. But, just look at what damage was caused to Serbia with only very light humanitarian bombing. The USA didn't even have to put one American soldier on the ground during the 1999 whipping of Serbia. When use of NATO ground troops was mentioned, Serbia rolled over and sued for peace.
(The Count of Kosova, 14 January 2012 05:27)

Where are those superior weapons? The US has left Iraq defeated and in the process of leaving Afghanistan defeated so where are those superior weapons?
Comment like “Germany, has more than an adequate number of highly trained troops to protect against any Russian threat” tell us how naïve you are. NATO is a group which is composed of each country bringing some type of equipment or trained personnel to the group – the US was the only one that could have carried out a war without NATO.
The Germans could not stop a cranky grandmother on their own.
Now when the US is so superior to all the rest then why would they have 19 countries attack a small nation of only 10 million? Surely the US superiority would have been enough to scare them?
On the issue of ground troops the US just relied on bombing as the losses would have been too high. The Russians owed Serbia about 1 billion and had they supplied Serbia with S300s then you superior forces would have been history. Has it even in your small mind occurred why a superior military machine like the US constantly only attacks small and defenseless countries?
Albanian BS at its best.

Ron Paul has some good ideas. Then, he has some crazy ideas. Seselj has a better chance of getting out of jail than Paul of becoming president.
(metrod, 13 January 2012 23:09)

Ron Paul is extremely sound, that is why he has much of the youth and elderly vote and suprise minimal media exposure. He is not a "Christian crazy" or "war monger" so he misses out on some votes. Overall he understands that the USA is being indebted to fight wars of control for corporation profit and while it does that the USA is controlled by debt. Imagine having billions upon billions in stimulis aid going to produce nothing or to be circulated into an economy but instead lining the profits of black hole business and banking. Thats called killing two birds with one stone. Is it "crazy" for seeing that and calling to rectify this situation? Your opinions sound like muppet responses more and more with every post.

"It's more likely that RuPaul will be next US president than Ron Paul
J.Oker"

That was the funniest thing all day on this forum! How can anyone give you thumbs down?

Ron Paul has some good ideas. Then, he has some crazy ideas. Seselj has a better chance of getting out of jail than Paul of becoming president.
(metrod, 13 January 2012 23:09)

A Very high chance then?

I Quote -

The withdrawal is part of a 10-year defense strategy that U.S. President Barack Obama presented on January 5, giving strategic priority to the Asia-Pacific and Middle East regions.

Comment.

Rhe US will lose all influense in the Far East as well as the Middle East.

Saudi-Arabia has seen the wery Sloth stance the US has taken against Iran and dont trust the US any longer.

The Idiot Clinton was the one that gave North-Korea their Nuclear Capability and this conflict will eventually force the US out of the Far East.

BY-BY-Yanks.