The Court of Appeals in Belgrade overturned the ruling that sent KLA's Gnjilane Group to a total of 101 years in prison for murder of civilians in 1999.
"The first-instance verdict was quashed due to serious violation of the criminal proceedings, the fact that the statement of reasons fails to mention certain facts, while the reasons offered are elusive and contradictory to a great extent, the release reads."
If possible, I would like to know some more details about this last turn of events. When this trial started long ago, we read plenty of details on B92 involving cut heads, ears and hands and similar gruesome stuff that turns stomachs upside down. Now, we read that "reasons are elusive and contradictory to a great extent". Which reasons?
"The first-instance verdict was quashed due to serious violation of the criminal proceedings, the fact that the statement of reasons fails to mention certain facts, while the reasons offered are elusive and contradictory to a great extent, the release reads."
If possible, I would like to know some more details about this last turn of events. When this trial started long ago, we read plenty of details on B92 involving cut heads, ears and hands and similar gruesome stuff that turns stomachs upside down. Now, we read that "reasons are elusive and contradictory to a great extent". Which reasons?
"The first-instance verdict was quashed due to serious violation of the criminal proceedings, the fact that the statement of reasons fails to mention certain facts, while the reasons offered are elusive and contradictory to a great extent, the release reads."
If possible, I would like to know some more details about this last turn of events. When this trial started long ago, we read plenty of details on B92 involving cut heads, ears and hands and similar gruesome stuff that turns stomachs upside down. Now, we read that "reasons are elusive and contradictory to a great extent". Which reasons?
IMAGE SOURCE
3 Komentari
Sortiraj po: