Opposition party accuses KFOR of violating UNSC resolution

That is like stating the obvious. Of course KFOR are violating 1244. The question is not IF they are doing it, but instead how Serbia will respond to the violations of 1244.

The SRS has requested the government to call an emergency UN Security Council session because KFOR troops entered the territory of central Serbia, thus violating UNSC Resolution 1244.

They entered Serbian territory with shovels only, and you can imagen if they enter with military hardware(tanks,armored vehicles and what have you), Serbia will be toast.

"They entered Serbian territory with shovels only, and you can imagen if they enter with military hardware(tanks,armored vehicles and what have you), Serbia will be toast.
Agim Kelmendi, 5 November 2011 16:44)"

I, don´t think so. Remember, in 1999 NATO never tried to intervene in KiM with ground forces because they feared the Serbian ground forces.
So, NATO, afer all of the lies told by you K.-Albanians, bombed Serbian civilians.
It is very interesting that you, K.-Albanian, are dreaming about KFOR entering Central Serbia with weapons:
Even in your dreaming you need KFOR !

"The party added that the president's “treacherous authorities” had given up on Kosovo for the sake of the EU and NATO accession, the organizations that the Radicals believe are leading a “criminal policy toward Serbia"


That Tadic is a traitor, it is beyond doubt. But in this case he is supporting Kosovo Serbs by giving them a piece of public land in Serbia where they can play with barricades after the criminal KFOR destroyed their toy in Kosovo. If it were not for Tadic, Kosovo Serbs will have remained without a place where to play with barricades.

I, don´t think so. Remember, in 1999 NATO never tried to intervene in KiM with ground forces because they feared the Serbian ground forces.
So, NATO, afer all of the lies told by you K.-Albanians, bombed Serbian civilians.
It is very interesting that you, K.-Albanian, are dreaming about KFOR entering Central Serbia with weapons:
(dht, 6 November 2011 11:57)

Rest assured about that; NATO is all p... and wind (as sj says). When NATO hears the name of the mighty Serbian Army it shakes with fear. NATO still remembers the humiliating defeat it suffered from the Serbian army in 1999 when NATO was forced from the Serbian army to occupy Kosovo without any casulaties.

"Rest assured about that; NATO is all p... and wind (as sj says). When NATO hears the name of the mighty Serbian Army it shakes with fear. NATO still remembers the humiliating defeat it suffered from the Serbian army in 1999 when NATO was forced from the Serbian army to occupy Kosovo without any casulaties.
(icj1, 6 November 2011 15:16)"

Oh, oh, oh, our international law expert icj1 has spoken.

As I am neither a Serb nor an Albanian (but the citizen of a NATO member state, Germany) I can speak from an more objective point of view:

From the military point of view, the K.-Albanians did a very poor job against the Serbs. So, if I would be a K.-Albanian, I wouldn´t have such a big mouth, since, from the military point of view, you were really loosers. But you were good liars ...

Yes, the Serbs have lost against NATO (because NATO blackmailed Serbia by its bombing of civilian targets). However, that is no shame because nearly every country in the world would have lost against NATO.

(icj1, 6 November 2011 15:16)

There were 19 countries against Serbia so is it a wonder that she had to make a deal. How many were harassing your Albanians before you guys ran to mother again?
NATO did have casualties in Kosovo they just did not talk about it. One memorable moment was when a US helicopter with 50 Special Forces was shot down. The Serbs put the bodies in a cold storage truck and drove it to the Greek border and handed them over to the Americans. Then there was the time the windbags brought over their Apache helicopters into northern Albania and the Serbs destroyed 10 of them. Then there were the stealth bombers.
But the best was when William Cohen the US defense secretary removed General Clarke three months before he was due to step down because he told lies about the NATOs successes in Kosovo. Several journalists who went into Kosovo with the advance NATO troops reported only seeing a tank and a military truck destroyed.
The best part was Cohen was HORRIFIED to see all that Serb soldiers and equipment untouched being moved out of Kosovo. The removal was an insulting gesture to say the least. That knucklehead Clarke wanted a parade in Ney York – what an idiot.
Boy get your facts right before opening you mouth next time.

Oh, oh, oh, our international law expert icj1 has spoken.
(dht, 6 November 2011 17:23)

Thank you, but in this case it was not a matter of law. I was trying to give my humble contribution to convince the readers about how mighty the Serbian Army is compared to NATO.
----------

From the military point of view, the K.-Albanians did a very poor job against the Serbs. So, if I would be a K.-Albanian, I wouldn´t have such a big mouth, since, from the military point of view, you were really loosers. But you were good liars ...
(dht, 6 November 2011 17:23)

That’s what I was trying to tell the readers of the forum, as well. K. Albanians did a very poor job since just several thousand of heroic Serbian soldiers were able to easily displace from their homes more than 700,000 Kosovo Albanians in 1999.
----------

Yes, the Serbs have lost against NATO (because NATO blackmailed Serbia by its bombing of civilian targets). However, that is no shame because nearly every country in the world would have lost against NATO.
(dht, 6 November 2011 17:23)

Oh, no, here I disagree. Only a traitor can say those words. The all mighty Serbian army delivered a humiliating blow to NATO in 1999 by forcing NATO to occupy Kosovo without any casualties.

The SRS has requested the government to call an emergency UN Security Council session because KFOR troops entered the territory of central Serbia, thus violating UNSC Resolution 1244.

They entered Serbian territory with shovels only, and you can imagen if they enter with military hardware(tanks,armored vehicles and what have you), Serbia will be toast.

"The party added that the president's “treacherous authorities” had given up on Kosovo for the sake of the EU and NATO accession, the organizations that the Radicals believe are leading a “criminal policy toward Serbia"


That Tadic is a traitor, it is beyond doubt. But in this case he is supporting Kosovo Serbs by giving them a piece of public land in Serbia where they can play with barricades after the criminal KFOR destroyed their toy in Kosovo. If it were not for Tadic, Kosovo Serbs will have remained without a place where to play with barricades.

That is like stating the obvious. Of course KFOR are violating 1244. The question is not IF they are doing it, but instead how Serbia will respond to the violations of 1244.

"They entered Serbian territory with shovels only, and you can imagen if they enter with military hardware(tanks,armored vehicles and what have you), Serbia will be toast.
Agim Kelmendi, 5 November 2011 16:44)"

I, don´t think so. Remember, in 1999 NATO never tried to intervene in KiM with ground forces because they feared the Serbian ground forces.
So, NATO, afer all of the lies told by you K.-Albanians, bombed Serbian civilians.
It is very interesting that you, K.-Albanian, are dreaming about KFOR entering Central Serbia with weapons:
Even in your dreaming you need KFOR !

I, don´t think so. Remember, in 1999 NATO never tried to intervene in KiM with ground forces because they feared the Serbian ground forces.
So, NATO, afer all of the lies told by you K.-Albanians, bombed Serbian civilians.
It is very interesting that you, K.-Albanian, are dreaming about KFOR entering Central Serbia with weapons:
(dht, 6 November 2011 11:57)

Rest assured about that; NATO is all p... and wind (as sj says). When NATO hears the name of the mighty Serbian Army it shakes with fear. NATO still remembers the humiliating defeat it suffered from the Serbian army in 1999 when NATO was forced from the Serbian army to occupy Kosovo without any casulaties.

"Rest assured about that; NATO is all p... and wind (as sj says). When NATO hears the name of the mighty Serbian Army it shakes with fear. NATO still remembers the humiliating defeat it suffered from the Serbian army in 1999 when NATO was forced from the Serbian army to occupy Kosovo without any casulaties.
(icj1, 6 November 2011 15:16)"

Oh, oh, oh, our international law expert icj1 has spoken.

As I am neither a Serb nor an Albanian (but the citizen of a NATO member state, Germany) I can speak from an more objective point of view:

From the military point of view, the K.-Albanians did a very poor job against the Serbs. So, if I would be a K.-Albanian, I wouldn´t have such a big mouth, since, from the military point of view, you were really loosers. But you were good liars ...

Yes, the Serbs have lost against NATO (because NATO blackmailed Serbia by its bombing of civilian targets). However, that is no shame because nearly every country in the world would have lost against NATO.

Oh, oh, oh, our international law expert icj1 has spoken.
(dht, 6 November 2011 17:23)

Thank you, but in this case it was not a matter of law. I was trying to give my humble contribution to convince the readers about how mighty the Serbian Army is compared to NATO.
----------

From the military point of view, the K.-Albanians did a very poor job against the Serbs. So, if I would be a K.-Albanian, I wouldn´t have such a big mouth, since, from the military point of view, you were really loosers. But you were good liars ...
(dht, 6 November 2011 17:23)

That’s what I was trying to tell the readers of the forum, as well. K. Albanians did a very poor job since just several thousand of heroic Serbian soldiers were able to easily displace from their homes more than 700,000 Kosovo Albanians in 1999.
----------

Yes, the Serbs have lost against NATO (because NATO blackmailed Serbia by its bombing of civilian targets). However, that is no shame because nearly every country in the world would have lost against NATO.
(dht, 6 November 2011 17:23)

Oh, no, here I disagree. Only a traitor can say those words. The all mighty Serbian army delivered a humiliating blow to NATO in 1999 by forcing NATO to occupy Kosovo without any casualties.

(icj1, 6 November 2011 15:16)

There were 19 countries against Serbia so is it a wonder that she had to make a deal. How many were harassing your Albanians before you guys ran to mother again?
NATO did have casualties in Kosovo they just did not talk about it. One memorable moment was when a US helicopter with 50 Special Forces was shot down. The Serbs put the bodies in a cold storage truck and drove it to the Greek border and handed them over to the Americans. Then there was the time the windbags brought over their Apache helicopters into northern Albania and the Serbs destroyed 10 of them. Then there were the stealth bombers.
But the best was when William Cohen the US defense secretary removed General Clarke three months before he was due to step down because he told lies about the NATOs successes in Kosovo. Several journalists who went into Kosovo with the advance NATO troops reported only seeing a tank and a military truck destroyed.
The best part was Cohen was HORRIFIED to see all that Serb soldiers and equipment untouched being moved out of Kosovo. The removal was an insulting gesture to say the least. That knucklehead Clarke wanted a parade in Ney York – what an idiot.
Boy get your facts right before opening you mouth next time.