follow to the gold my friend..
pre 12 godina
as denis said:
"Well here it goes same old mambo jumbo about WWII. First that was not Greece's gold to start with. Only in the 1830's Great Powers gave some 60 milion francs (over $120B in todays currency) to Greece to build it into anything close to a modern state"...
within that statement Greece is given gold. once something is given to you it is yours, as per the definition of the words. furthermore, extrapolating from your logic, nobody's gold is theirs. it was someones else who gave it to them, unless they actually found it in the pebbles of a river, or other places one might find gold.
normally things that are sold or given are no longer things that are owned by the previous owner, and are effectively owned by the new owner as per the agreement of giving or selling the goods in question.
furthermore you seem to think that the western nations of europe recieved nothing in return for this gold. perhaps those fabulous beaches on the north sea would have been a better place to summer than the agean. perhaps the western world's model of politics, namely the greatest political invention ever as per the western mouth pieces, is of some value. perhaps the centuries long effective border on, around or near greece that seperated the europeans from the ottomans, notice the bismarks, the francs and so forth all enjoyed relative peace on their land while the peasants of the balkans fought to keep europe safe.
there are many many ways that the value of a nation is calculated.
furthermore to all of this air fairy stuff, it was the eurozone banks, chalked full of the best and brightest banking minds throughout the lands of europe that saw it fir to offer lower than reasonable loans, en masse to nations such as greece, italy, spain, portugal, and ireland. these discount bargain bin loans were very bad decisions by the so-called best. this class of the best, after realizing that they made the mistakes are now punishing others without bringing the lash upon their own backs. it would be reasonable to accept that greece and the others pay their debts back iff (if and only if) the experts take on similar levels of responsibility.
consider the simplified example of you lending me money. say i have gainful employment and am making a good amount of money. i need some extra money to purchase something large. you would wisely consider my financial portfolio before determing how much i can borrow and what the appropriate pay-back schedule is. this is how it should go. now consider that i have lost my job, and have been without one for 2 years now, i have very little if any liquid savings and my assests are limited. if you loan me money to purchase something that is out of my means, even with the loan, and expect me to pay back at a vigourous schedule i wonder how much of that decision is your own fault -- if i was lending money to a broke client i would assume all failures of that client to pay back said loan would weigh on my shoulders as well as the clients as it is i who claim to be the lender/expert and i should have taken all the steps to ensure my due-diligence in the matter.
again it was and is greece's gold. it was given to them
and the loans that were poorly handed out should weigh partially on the lender's shoulders and not just the reciever of the loan.
11 Komentari
Sortiraj po: