“Israel wants peace with Palestinians”

Why don't you quote Abbas or Hamas leadership instead of quoting only the leader of apartheid regime?

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in New York on Friday that Israel wanted peace but that it could only be reached through negotiations.

Sounds like the something I've heard from clowns in Belgrade saying. I don't understand what needs to be "negotiated" since Palestinians are only applying for UN membership.....maybe they mean why don't we negotiate you not becoming sovereign in any way including UN membership; thus establishing the link that it is in the best interest of Jewish citizens of Israel (that felt weird, we should just say Jews) for the Palestinians to suffer in any way.


Let’s negotiate peace,” he said.

You don't negotiate peace. Peace is a state of being...You wouldn't say let's negotiate war, so why would you say that about peace?





Thanks,

"NEW YORK -- Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in New York on Friday that Israel wanted peace but that it could only be reached through negotiations."

I am curious, Serbia's Prime Minister Mirko Cvetković would also prefer a settlement with K-Albanians through negotiations, right?

Now this is the setting now:

Israel: "we want negotiations"
Palestinians: "we suffered way to much, statehood first"
Serbia: "we want negotiations"
Albanians: "we suffered way to much, statehood first"

Hillary: "the sh*t not rains, it pours"

A crook woman. But if we look at her incredibly dirty campaign against Obama, this is not a news. Why anyone would support her after her campaign is a mystery. And why Obama did choose her to lead the foreign affairs is an other mystery.

Her job should be to sort blue dresses from red ones.... even that in spirit she is neither "blue" nor "red", just brown.

"You don't negotiate peace. Peace is a state of being...You wouldn't say let's negotiate war, so why would you say that about peace?"

(KOSO, 24 September 2011 14:44)

If you define peace as the absence of war, you are right. But if you want a lasting solution for a problem, you won't reach it by unilateral moves. Not by launching a bid to become an UN member state by Palestine, not by declaring an UDI in case of Kosovo. Both doesn't have any chance to ever become a real state that is an UN member and internationally recognized without negotiations and a bilaterally agreed solution.

It's somehow bizarre: On the one hand, Palestine is like Kosovo: In a limbo state, poor, depending on donor money, with no future. On the other hand, just like Israel is trying to change the situation on the ground by expanding their settlements, Kosovo is trying to change the situation by stupid and unnecessary moves in the North.

The world saw and heard who gave a radical anti-Israeli speech, and who called the Palestinians to come back immediately to negotiations table..

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in New York on Friday that Israel wanted peace but that it could only be reached through negotiations.

Sounds like the something I've heard from clowns in Belgrade saying. I don't understand what needs to be "negotiated" since Palestinians are only applying for UN membership.....maybe they mean why don't we negotiate you not becoming sovereign in any way including UN membership; thus establishing the link that it is in the best interest of Jewish citizens of Israel (that felt weird, we should just say Jews) for the Palestinians to suffer in any way.


Let’s negotiate peace,” he said.

You don't negotiate peace. Peace is a state of being...You wouldn't say let's negotiate war, so why would you say that about peace?





Thanks,

The world saw and heard who gave a radical anti-Israeli speech, and who called the Palestinians to come back immediately to negotiations table..

"NEW YORK -- Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in New York on Friday that Israel wanted peace but that it could only be reached through negotiations."

I am curious, Serbia's Prime Minister Mirko Cvetković would also prefer a settlement with K-Albanians through negotiations, right?

Now this is the setting now:

Israel: "we want negotiations"
Palestinians: "we suffered way to much, statehood first"
Serbia: "we want negotiations"
Albanians: "we suffered way to much, statehood first"

Hillary: "the sh*t not rains, it pours"

A crook woman. But if we look at her incredibly dirty campaign against Obama, this is not a news. Why anyone would support her after her campaign is a mystery. And why Obama did choose her to lead the foreign affairs is an other mystery.

Her job should be to sort blue dresses from red ones.... even that in spirit she is neither "blue" nor "red", just brown.

Why don't you quote Abbas or Hamas leadership instead of quoting only the leader of apartheid regime?

"You don't negotiate peace. Peace is a state of being...You wouldn't say let's negotiate war, so why would you say that about peace?"

(KOSO, 24 September 2011 14:44)

If you define peace as the absence of war, you are right. But if you want a lasting solution for a problem, you won't reach it by unilateral moves. Not by launching a bid to become an UN member state by Palestine, not by declaring an UDI in case of Kosovo. Both doesn't have any chance to ever become a real state that is an UN member and internationally recognized without negotiations and a bilaterally agreed solution.

It's somehow bizarre: On the one hand, Palestine is like Kosovo: In a limbo state, poor, depending on donor money, with no future. On the other hand, just like Israel is trying to change the situation on the ground by expanding their settlements, Kosovo is trying to change the situation by stupid and unnecessary moves in the North.