15

Saturday, 13.08.2011.

14:20

Autonomy not discussed, Belgrade team head says

Belgrade negotiating team head Borislav Stefanović has stated that Belgrade is not discussing autonomy for north Kosovo.

Izvor: Beta

Autonomy not discussed, Belgrade team head says IMAGE SOURCE
IMAGE DESCRIPTION

15 Komentari

Sortiraj po:

icj1

pre 12 godina

If he would be impartial as he should
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

Nowhere is written that he should be impartial; he should be against those who violate 1244.



- he would first proceed militarily against the ROSU, than against the road blockades.
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

Why, what did ROSU do ? On the other hand the road blockades blocked the freedom of movement in Kosovo and KFOR is tasked by 1244 to ensure the freedom of movement.



That would be the proper approach from an impartial military force intent merely keep law and order and keep itself neutral. Remark: if he would show ROSU who is their daddy (as he did not!) - the road blockades would be a non-issue.
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

That’s not what 1244 says. It does not say that KFOR is there to “merely keep law and order and keep itself neutral”



Instead ROSU got help (helicopters) from him essentially against the spirit of KFOR deployment
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

What is the spirit of KFOR deployment ? Where can I read that ?



- than after that action was largely unsuccessful he negotiated essentially representing Albanians and bluffing. He was expecting Belgrade to go into chicken mode - and they did.
This could be sympathetic to you - but IMO it was unfair, unprofessional and essentially revealed him clearly taking sides (given the family background that is not a surprise!)
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

Taking sides is not = unfair. It depends. If one side violates 1244 by blocking the freedom of movement in Kosovo, KFOR has a duty under 1244 to take action against that side. That would be fair, professional and clearly taking side with 1244.



Nothing was solved but of course people who want to get rid of Serbs in Kosovo got some adrenaline rush.
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

Of course nothing was solved, but it was a step in the right direction for solving the issue of Serbia not accepting Kosovo’s customs stamps for which UNMIK has repeatedly assured that they are in line with 1244 and CEFTA provisions.

Ataman

pre 12 godina

Where do you get your MIS information you are beginning to sound more and more like staff and sj.
The US stance on Kosovo is the same now as it was from 2000 to 2008 under Bush administration, and I doubt very seriously that his admin gave a rats A about Hilary's ego!
(pss, 14 August 2011 02:02)

From a well-known book about Hillary - which actually praises her. What it wrote (or I wrote) does not contradict with what you say about Bush. These are two different things, each can be perfectly explained on each own. The years you do mention were Dick Cheney (and Halliburton) - years. In the fact, Cheney, Bush and Clinton families have quite some things to do with Halliburton and certain finance mafia.

Consider yourself lucky for now - your agenda and the recently popular "neo-con" + "neo-liberal" agendas do meet.

Hruz

pre 12 godina

Kosovo is Srbija!!!! There are no if's or but's. At the end there is going to be a war again. That is sad but true.
(Srb, 13 August 2011 16:39)

Be careful what you wish for. Don't play with fire, there is still more to lose for Serbia from its unjustly held territories.

pss

pre 12 godina

Ataman, 13 August 2011 17:22)
Where do you get your MIS information you are beginning to sound more and more like staff and sj.
The US stance on Kosovo is the same now as it was from 2000 to 2008 under Bush administration, and I doubt very seriously that his admin gave a rats A about Hilary's ego!

Ataman

pre 12 godina

and what you fail to say is the fact that in all German military blogs Buhler was so heavily criticized for his soft approach on Serbian road blockades and his decision to withdraw his troop that he had himself to explain his decision and reply to these critiques.

(ben, 13 August 2011 17:22)

We talking about two very different things. One is military action, the other is political stance.

Bühler as military leader did not seek confrontation. If you favor confrontations - this is your choice. He was sure, he can achieve same (or even more!) things politically because of his background and because he knew the expected reaction of the opponent.

If he would be impartial as he should - he would first proceed militarily against the ROSU, than against the road blockades. That would be the proper approach from an impartial military force intent merely keep law and order and keep itself neutral. Remark: if he would show ROSU who is their daddy (as he did not!) - the road blockades would be a non-issue.

Instead ROSU got help (helicopters) from him essentially against the spirit of KFOR deployment - than after that action was largely unsuccessful he negotiated essentially representing Albanians and bluffing. He was expecting Belgrade to go into chicken mode - and they did.

This could be sympathetic to you - but IMO it was unfair, unprofessional and essentially revealed him clearly taking sides (given the family background that is not a surprise!)

Nothing was solved but of course people who want to get rid of Serbs in Kosovo got some adrenaline rush.

KOSO

pre 12 godina

I would like to know what this Slobodan, who is critiquing the ruling elites, exactly what has his party done for the Kosovar minorities in the past decade.

There was a time when he was somewhat relevant in the Koso-Serbo sphere but like Kushtunica (Kustunica) he is all smoke and no fire.

Mork

pre 12 godina

A ghetto??? that is a compliment

north kosova is a black hole.

Mork calling Orson (ben), Mork calling Orson. It is time to quit the alien planet. You experiment to pass as a normal european has failed. Mission aborted. Come home to planet Illyria.

ben

pre 12 godina

... but even that source fails to mention Albanian wife, only that Erhard Bühler has "ties too close to the region".
(Ataman, 13 August 2011 16:03

and what you fail to say is the fact that in all German military blogs Buhler was so heavily criticized for his soft approach on Serbian road blockades and his decision to withdraw his troop that he had himself to explain his decision and reply to these critiques.

I guess you will say that all those that criticize Buhler have Albanian wives or husbands.

Will you give up of your charlatanism???

Ataman

pre 12 godina

Kosovo is Srbija.... why there's going to be a war ?!
(icj1, 13 August 2011 16:55)

Looked inside a book about Hillary - the entire Kosovo problem can be explained by hurt womanhood of a very ambitious (over-ambitious), carrier-freak woman. Do not want to repeat myself again and again - at the moment she goes away I expect less tensions. She is all her pride being hurt and exporting that feeling to ex-YU. Plus the usual American-Russian power games.

The current situation is very asymmetrical because in foreign politics Russia's prime focus is economy and development (of course for own benefit!), America's prime focus is Hillary's ego.

Reason and ego is not compatible and try to argue with a powerful woman who had a hurt ego during the 1999 crisis. Thank God, she is not the president and the sooner she goes the better for America (too).

And the rest (Albanians, Serbs, German, French and so on) are just minor players; Serbs and Albanians the least important ones.

Ataman

pre 12 godina

Looking at the picture - few things about Gerhard Bühler.

"Auch persönlich ist Bühler der Region eng verbunden"

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C31325/im-portrait-erhard-buehler-der-umsichtige-general-30478112.html

The PERSONAL connection of Mr. Bühler to the region is barely if ever touched, much likely the personal connection to Russia of Kosovo ex-president ( Behgjet Pacolli ).

The connection is the same kind: WIFE.

Now - who you think is in command of KFOR forces in Kosovo? Of course, de-facto an Albanian lady.

It seems, Americans don't mind it, but Pacolli was deemed as a danger to American national security - so he had to go. And not because of some suspicious business (who does not have it in the region?)

Compare: the wife of ex-Ukrainian president is American and the wife of Saak is Dutch. That does not disturb the American political elite, neither the K-Albanian wife of Bühler.

But - oh well - the Russian wife of Pacolli is a "problem", so he had to go.

The good news: at one point so much hypocrisy is enough even for organizations used to it,
Bühler has not even a month left in Kosovo - precisely because of the conflict of interest.
After September 9 2011 he will be replaced by general Erhard Drews.

source (in German):

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C31325/im-portrait-erhard-buehler-der-umsichtige-general-30478112.html

... but even that source fails to mention Albanian wife, only that Erhard Bühler has "ties too close to the region".

ben

pre 12 godina

A ghetto??? that is a compliment

north kosova is a black hole.

Ppl dive 35 years old Zastava there the richest has Yugo Forida. Nothing has changed in the last 25-30 years there, not even a tooth has been repaired.

People dress as in the mid 80s there - just watch your minister Bogdanovic how he dresses with suits from Kod Kluza.

North is a black hole run by few criminals linked and supported materially and politically by some xenophobes in Belgrade mainly from the Samardzic's party.

You don't understand the establishing the rule of law there means improving the miserable life of the honest Serbs living there?

you don't because you know very well that every single normal person in this world K-Serbs including now very well that Serbia will never have a say in Kosova anymore and consequently they will integrate in Kosova's - theirs- insitutions. While you can easily buy the loyalty of the criminals as you are doping now and sacrifice the live of the honest Serbs there.

icj1

pre 12 godina

Kosovo is Srbija!!!! There are no if's or but's. At the end there is going to be a war again. That is sad but true.
(Srb, 13 August 2011 16:39)

Kosovo is Srbija.... why there's going to be a war ?!

AussieSerb

pre 12 godina

Haven't discussed it yet hey', - cause they are scared to say & do anything right now, EU's watching' - ofcourse. Gutless pri..ks' in BG.
They should be planning to rescue our people and push hard for peace and autonomy for our brothers', - it must be a MUST' and nothing less.
It is sad watching how events are unfolding in favour of those others.

ben

pre 12 godina

A ghetto??? that is a compliment

north kosova is a black hole.

Ppl dive 35 years old Zastava there the richest has Yugo Forida. Nothing has changed in the last 25-30 years there, not even a tooth has been repaired.

People dress as in the mid 80s there - just watch your minister Bogdanovic how he dresses with suits from Kod Kluza.

North is a black hole run by few criminals linked and supported materially and politically by some xenophobes in Belgrade mainly from the Samardzic's party.

You don't understand the establishing the rule of law there means improving the miserable life of the honest Serbs living there?

you don't because you know very well that every single normal person in this world K-Serbs including now very well that Serbia will never have a say in Kosova anymore and consequently they will integrate in Kosova's - theirs- insitutions. While you can easily buy the loyalty of the criminals as you are doping now and sacrifice the live of the honest Serbs there.

Ataman

pre 12 godina

Looking at the picture - few things about Gerhard Bühler.

"Auch persönlich ist Bühler der Region eng verbunden"

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C31325/im-portrait-erhard-buehler-der-umsichtige-general-30478112.html

The PERSONAL connection of Mr. Bühler to the region is barely if ever touched, much likely the personal connection to Russia of Kosovo ex-president ( Behgjet Pacolli ).

The connection is the same kind: WIFE.

Now - who you think is in command of KFOR forces in Kosovo? Of course, de-facto an Albanian lady.

It seems, Americans don't mind it, but Pacolli was deemed as a danger to American national security - so he had to go. And not because of some suspicious business (who does not have it in the region?)

Compare: the wife of ex-Ukrainian president is American and the wife of Saak is Dutch. That does not disturb the American political elite, neither the K-Albanian wife of Bühler.

But - oh well - the Russian wife of Pacolli is a "problem", so he had to go.

The good news: at one point so much hypocrisy is enough even for organizations used to it,
Bühler has not even a month left in Kosovo - precisely because of the conflict of interest.
After September 9 2011 he will be replaced by general Erhard Drews.

source (in German):

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C31325/im-portrait-erhard-buehler-der-umsichtige-general-30478112.html

... but even that source fails to mention Albanian wife, only that Erhard Bühler has "ties too close to the region".

ben

pre 12 godina

... but even that source fails to mention Albanian wife, only that Erhard Bühler has "ties too close to the region".
(Ataman, 13 August 2011 16:03

and what you fail to say is the fact that in all German military blogs Buhler was so heavily criticized for his soft approach on Serbian road blockades and his decision to withdraw his troop that he had himself to explain his decision and reply to these critiques.

I guess you will say that all those that criticize Buhler have Albanian wives or husbands.

Will you give up of your charlatanism???

Mork

pre 12 godina

A ghetto??? that is a compliment

north kosova is a black hole.

Mork calling Orson (ben), Mork calling Orson. It is time to quit the alien planet. You experiment to pass as a normal european has failed. Mission aborted. Come home to planet Illyria.

Ataman

pre 12 godina

Kosovo is Srbija.... why there's going to be a war ?!
(icj1, 13 August 2011 16:55)

Looked inside a book about Hillary - the entire Kosovo problem can be explained by hurt womanhood of a very ambitious (over-ambitious), carrier-freak woman. Do not want to repeat myself again and again - at the moment she goes away I expect less tensions. She is all her pride being hurt and exporting that feeling to ex-YU. Plus the usual American-Russian power games.

The current situation is very asymmetrical because in foreign politics Russia's prime focus is economy and development (of course for own benefit!), America's prime focus is Hillary's ego.

Reason and ego is not compatible and try to argue with a powerful woman who had a hurt ego during the 1999 crisis. Thank God, she is not the president and the sooner she goes the better for America (too).

And the rest (Albanians, Serbs, German, French and so on) are just minor players; Serbs and Albanians the least important ones.

AussieSerb

pre 12 godina

Haven't discussed it yet hey', - cause they are scared to say & do anything right now, EU's watching' - ofcourse. Gutless pri..ks' in BG.
They should be planning to rescue our people and push hard for peace and autonomy for our brothers', - it must be a MUST' and nothing less.
It is sad watching how events are unfolding in favour of those others.

icj1

pre 12 godina

Kosovo is Srbija!!!! There are no if's or but's. At the end there is going to be a war again. That is sad but true.
(Srb, 13 August 2011 16:39)

Kosovo is Srbija.... why there's going to be a war ?!

pss

pre 12 godina

Ataman, 13 August 2011 17:22)
Where do you get your MIS information you are beginning to sound more and more like staff and sj.
The US stance on Kosovo is the same now as it was from 2000 to 2008 under Bush administration, and I doubt very seriously that his admin gave a rats A about Hilary's ego!

KOSO

pre 12 godina

I would like to know what this Slobodan, who is critiquing the ruling elites, exactly what has his party done for the Kosovar minorities in the past decade.

There was a time when he was somewhat relevant in the Koso-Serbo sphere but like Kushtunica (Kustunica) he is all smoke and no fire.

Ataman

pre 12 godina

and what you fail to say is the fact that in all German military blogs Buhler was so heavily criticized for his soft approach on Serbian road blockades and his decision to withdraw his troop that he had himself to explain his decision and reply to these critiques.

(ben, 13 August 2011 17:22)

We talking about two very different things. One is military action, the other is political stance.

Bühler as military leader did not seek confrontation. If you favor confrontations - this is your choice. He was sure, he can achieve same (or even more!) things politically because of his background and because he knew the expected reaction of the opponent.

If he would be impartial as he should - he would first proceed militarily against the ROSU, than against the road blockades. That would be the proper approach from an impartial military force intent merely keep law and order and keep itself neutral. Remark: if he would show ROSU who is their daddy (as he did not!) - the road blockades would be a non-issue.

Instead ROSU got help (helicopters) from him essentially against the spirit of KFOR deployment - than after that action was largely unsuccessful he negotiated essentially representing Albanians and bluffing. He was expecting Belgrade to go into chicken mode - and they did.

This could be sympathetic to you - but IMO it was unfair, unprofessional and essentially revealed him clearly taking sides (given the family background that is not a surprise!)

Nothing was solved but of course people who want to get rid of Serbs in Kosovo got some adrenaline rush.

Hruz

pre 12 godina

Kosovo is Srbija!!!! There are no if's or but's. At the end there is going to be a war again. That is sad but true.
(Srb, 13 August 2011 16:39)

Be careful what you wish for. Don't play with fire, there is still more to lose for Serbia from its unjustly held territories.

Ataman

pre 12 godina

Where do you get your MIS information you are beginning to sound more and more like staff and sj.
The US stance on Kosovo is the same now as it was from 2000 to 2008 under Bush administration, and I doubt very seriously that his admin gave a rats A about Hilary's ego!
(pss, 14 August 2011 02:02)

From a well-known book about Hillary - which actually praises her. What it wrote (or I wrote) does not contradict with what you say about Bush. These are two different things, each can be perfectly explained on each own. The years you do mention were Dick Cheney (and Halliburton) - years. In the fact, Cheney, Bush and Clinton families have quite some things to do with Halliburton and certain finance mafia.

Consider yourself lucky for now - your agenda and the recently popular "neo-con" + "neo-liberal" agendas do meet.

icj1

pre 12 godina

If he would be impartial as he should
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

Nowhere is written that he should be impartial; he should be against those who violate 1244.



- he would first proceed militarily against the ROSU, than against the road blockades.
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

Why, what did ROSU do ? On the other hand the road blockades blocked the freedom of movement in Kosovo and KFOR is tasked by 1244 to ensure the freedom of movement.



That would be the proper approach from an impartial military force intent merely keep law and order and keep itself neutral. Remark: if he would show ROSU who is their daddy (as he did not!) - the road blockades would be a non-issue.
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

That’s not what 1244 says. It does not say that KFOR is there to “merely keep law and order and keep itself neutral”



Instead ROSU got help (helicopters) from him essentially against the spirit of KFOR deployment
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

What is the spirit of KFOR deployment ? Where can I read that ?



- than after that action was largely unsuccessful he negotiated essentially representing Albanians and bluffing. He was expecting Belgrade to go into chicken mode - and they did.
This could be sympathetic to you - but IMO it was unfair, unprofessional and essentially revealed him clearly taking sides (given the family background that is not a surprise!)
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

Taking sides is not = unfair. It depends. If one side violates 1244 by blocking the freedom of movement in Kosovo, KFOR has a duty under 1244 to take action against that side. That would be fair, professional and clearly taking side with 1244.



Nothing was solved but of course people who want to get rid of Serbs in Kosovo got some adrenaline rush.
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

Of course nothing was solved, but it was a step in the right direction for solving the issue of Serbia not accepting Kosovo’s customs stamps for which UNMIK has repeatedly assured that they are in line with 1244 and CEFTA provisions.

ben

pre 12 godina

A ghetto??? that is a compliment

north kosova is a black hole.

Ppl dive 35 years old Zastava there the richest has Yugo Forida. Nothing has changed in the last 25-30 years there, not even a tooth has been repaired.

People dress as in the mid 80s there - just watch your minister Bogdanovic how he dresses with suits from Kod Kluza.

North is a black hole run by few criminals linked and supported materially and politically by some xenophobes in Belgrade mainly from the Samardzic's party.

You don't understand the establishing the rule of law there means improving the miserable life of the honest Serbs living there?

you don't because you know very well that every single normal person in this world K-Serbs including now very well that Serbia will never have a say in Kosova anymore and consequently they will integrate in Kosova's - theirs- insitutions. While you can easily buy the loyalty of the criminals as you are doping now and sacrifice the live of the honest Serbs there.

icj1

pre 12 godina

Kosovo is Srbija!!!! There are no if's or but's. At the end there is going to be a war again. That is sad but true.
(Srb, 13 August 2011 16:39)

Kosovo is Srbija.... why there's going to be a war ?!

Mork

pre 12 godina

A ghetto??? that is a compliment

north kosova is a black hole.

Mork calling Orson (ben), Mork calling Orson. It is time to quit the alien planet. You experiment to pass as a normal european has failed. Mission aborted. Come home to planet Illyria.

KOSO

pre 12 godina

I would like to know what this Slobodan, who is critiquing the ruling elites, exactly what has his party done for the Kosovar minorities in the past decade.

There was a time when he was somewhat relevant in the Koso-Serbo sphere but like Kushtunica (Kustunica) he is all smoke and no fire.

ben

pre 12 godina

... but even that source fails to mention Albanian wife, only that Erhard Bühler has "ties too close to the region".
(Ataman, 13 August 2011 16:03

and what you fail to say is the fact that in all German military blogs Buhler was so heavily criticized for his soft approach on Serbian road blockades and his decision to withdraw his troop that he had himself to explain his decision and reply to these critiques.

I guess you will say that all those that criticize Buhler have Albanian wives or husbands.

Will you give up of your charlatanism???

AussieSerb

pre 12 godina

Haven't discussed it yet hey', - cause they are scared to say & do anything right now, EU's watching' - ofcourse. Gutless pri..ks' in BG.
They should be planning to rescue our people and push hard for peace and autonomy for our brothers', - it must be a MUST' and nothing less.
It is sad watching how events are unfolding in favour of those others.

Ataman

pre 12 godina

Looking at the picture - few things about Gerhard Bühler.

"Auch persönlich ist Bühler der Region eng verbunden"

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C31325/im-portrait-erhard-buehler-der-umsichtige-general-30478112.html

The PERSONAL connection of Mr. Bühler to the region is barely if ever touched, much likely the personal connection to Russia of Kosovo ex-president ( Behgjet Pacolli ).

The connection is the same kind: WIFE.

Now - who you think is in command of KFOR forces in Kosovo? Of course, de-facto an Albanian lady.

It seems, Americans don't mind it, but Pacolli was deemed as a danger to American national security - so he had to go. And not because of some suspicious business (who does not have it in the region?)

Compare: the wife of ex-Ukrainian president is American and the wife of Saak is Dutch. That does not disturb the American political elite, neither the K-Albanian wife of Bühler.

But - oh well - the Russian wife of Pacolli is a "problem", so he had to go.

The good news: at one point so much hypocrisy is enough even for organizations used to it,
Bühler has not even a month left in Kosovo - precisely because of the conflict of interest.
After September 9 2011 he will be replaced by general Erhard Drews.

source (in German):

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C31325/im-portrait-erhard-buehler-der-umsichtige-general-30478112.html

... but even that source fails to mention Albanian wife, only that Erhard Bühler has "ties too close to the region".

Ataman

pre 12 godina

Kosovo is Srbija.... why there's going to be a war ?!
(icj1, 13 August 2011 16:55)

Looked inside a book about Hillary - the entire Kosovo problem can be explained by hurt womanhood of a very ambitious (over-ambitious), carrier-freak woman. Do not want to repeat myself again and again - at the moment she goes away I expect less tensions. She is all her pride being hurt and exporting that feeling to ex-YU. Plus the usual American-Russian power games.

The current situation is very asymmetrical because in foreign politics Russia's prime focus is economy and development (of course for own benefit!), America's prime focus is Hillary's ego.

Reason and ego is not compatible and try to argue with a powerful woman who had a hurt ego during the 1999 crisis. Thank God, she is not the president and the sooner she goes the better for America (too).

And the rest (Albanians, Serbs, German, French and so on) are just minor players; Serbs and Albanians the least important ones.

Ataman

pre 12 godina

and what you fail to say is the fact that in all German military blogs Buhler was so heavily criticized for his soft approach on Serbian road blockades and his decision to withdraw his troop that he had himself to explain his decision and reply to these critiques.

(ben, 13 August 2011 17:22)

We talking about two very different things. One is military action, the other is political stance.

Bühler as military leader did not seek confrontation. If you favor confrontations - this is your choice. He was sure, he can achieve same (or even more!) things politically because of his background and because he knew the expected reaction of the opponent.

If he would be impartial as he should - he would first proceed militarily against the ROSU, than against the road blockades. That would be the proper approach from an impartial military force intent merely keep law and order and keep itself neutral. Remark: if he would show ROSU who is their daddy (as he did not!) - the road blockades would be a non-issue.

Instead ROSU got help (helicopters) from him essentially against the spirit of KFOR deployment - than after that action was largely unsuccessful he negotiated essentially representing Albanians and bluffing. He was expecting Belgrade to go into chicken mode - and they did.

This could be sympathetic to you - but IMO it was unfair, unprofessional and essentially revealed him clearly taking sides (given the family background that is not a surprise!)

Nothing was solved but of course people who want to get rid of Serbs in Kosovo got some adrenaline rush.

Hruz

pre 12 godina

Kosovo is Srbija!!!! There are no if's or but's. At the end there is going to be a war again. That is sad but true.
(Srb, 13 August 2011 16:39)

Be careful what you wish for. Don't play with fire, there is still more to lose for Serbia from its unjustly held territories.

Ataman

pre 12 godina

Where do you get your MIS information you are beginning to sound more and more like staff and sj.
The US stance on Kosovo is the same now as it was from 2000 to 2008 under Bush administration, and I doubt very seriously that his admin gave a rats A about Hilary's ego!
(pss, 14 August 2011 02:02)

From a well-known book about Hillary - which actually praises her. What it wrote (or I wrote) does not contradict with what you say about Bush. These are two different things, each can be perfectly explained on each own. The years you do mention were Dick Cheney (and Halliburton) - years. In the fact, Cheney, Bush and Clinton families have quite some things to do with Halliburton and certain finance mafia.

Consider yourself lucky for now - your agenda and the recently popular "neo-con" + "neo-liberal" agendas do meet.

pss

pre 12 godina

Ataman, 13 August 2011 17:22)
Where do you get your MIS information you are beginning to sound more and more like staff and sj.
The US stance on Kosovo is the same now as it was from 2000 to 2008 under Bush administration, and I doubt very seriously that his admin gave a rats A about Hilary's ego!

icj1

pre 12 godina

If he would be impartial as he should
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

Nowhere is written that he should be impartial; he should be against those who violate 1244.



- he would first proceed militarily against the ROSU, than against the road blockades.
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

Why, what did ROSU do ? On the other hand the road blockades blocked the freedom of movement in Kosovo and KFOR is tasked by 1244 to ensure the freedom of movement.



That would be the proper approach from an impartial military force intent merely keep law and order and keep itself neutral. Remark: if he would show ROSU who is their daddy (as he did not!) - the road blockades would be a non-issue.
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

That’s not what 1244 says. It does not say that KFOR is there to “merely keep law and order and keep itself neutral”



Instead ROSU got help (helicopters) from him essentially against the spirit of KFOR deployment
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

What is the spirit of KFOR deployment ? Where can I read that ?



- than after that action was largely unsuccessful he negotiated essentially representing Albanians and bluffing. He was expecting Belgrade to go into chicken mode - and they did.
This could be sympathetic to you - but IMO it was unfair, unprofessional and essentially revealed him clearly taking sides (given the family background that is not a surprise!)
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

Taking sides is not = unfair. It depends. If one side violates 1244 by blocking the freedom of movement in Kosovo, KFOR has a duty under 1244 to take action against that side. That would be fair, professional and clearly taking side with 1244.



Nothing was solved but of course people who want to get rid of Serbs in Kosovo got some adrenaline rush.
(Ataman, 14 August 2011 01:48)

Of course nothing was solved, but it was a step in the right direction for solving the issue of Serbia not accepting Kosovo’s customs stamps for which UNMIK has repeatedly assured that they are in line with 1244 and CEFTA provisions.