icj1
pre 12 godina
At the end of the Conflict Nato Accepted Milosevic's terms (which he'd offered at the beginning of the conflict), not vice versa, with those two terms cut out. That is a clear Serbian Victory.
(New Zealander, 29 July 2011 11:14)
Very nice then; Kosovo was happy with the outcome; Serbia, too. Everybody is happy !
Its good that serbian military oficials requested and had meeting with KFOR. Actually KFOR must inform serb oficials about what the hell they are doing, they were close to brake peace agrement from 1999.
(DX, 29 July 2011 11:28)
KFOR does not have to inform serb officials about anything. KFOR is there because the Security Council said so; not because of Serbia’s wishes.
Maybe you should read the judgement, particularly the part where it states 1244 is still in force.
(Zoran, 29 July 2011 20:20)
If that is the case then why is 1244 still valid?
(Ron, 29 July 2011 18:35)
Because Kosovo’s UDI is in accordance with 1244; in other words both the UDI and 1244 are valid. Not sure why some really can’t grasp that concept.
'declaring' independance is not against UN1244 but actually acting on it is.
(kujon, 29 July 2011 22:49)
Dude, what perverse logic is that ? !
You are saying that a lawful act authorizes you to do something. But if you actually do that thing, it is unlawful !
It does not say that Kosovo IS an independent nation now. If this was the case then 1244 should be invalid immeditally as then there is no longer a Serbian province of Kosovo.
(Ron, 30 July 2011 03:43)
No Sir, because under the terms of resolution 1244 (1999) the Security Council did not reserve for itself the final determination of the situation in Kosovo and remained silent on the conditions for the final status of Kosovo. So either dependence or independence are in line with 1244.
46 Komentari
Sortiraj po: