Gaddafi says NATO states could become targets

The world doesn't need any evidence of civilian casualties to admit that the war against Libya hasn't got anything to do with helping Libyan people, but to help the oil companies and the forces behind them.
The millions dead in Iraq and Afghanistan are more than enough to persuade any person on earth what are the intentions of the western powers in those countries.

It's also amazing that ordinary people in the west are staying silent in view of the carnage committed in Libya on their name.
Unless Western leaders held accountable for their crimes and brough to justice there will be more of the same in the near future.

NATO states could become targets? As opposed to what? Unintentional or accidental targets like Lockerbie? Gaddafi is a prick!

Gaddafi is well within his rights to say such a comment as the action over Libya is a regime change supported by other governments mainly from Europe and the USA, for whatever motive we will see only in the future. Perhaps some military bases. Maybe some people may comment over the legality of such an operation.
The entire situation is a disgrace and is only a showroom for the French Rafale and the Eurofighter to pursuade the Indian airforce to purchase their 126 plus aircraft, what lovely timing.

Future of Libya !.

In the Bible Daniel chapter 11:43.,
Libya is recorded as going to War against Egypt,
togheter with Ethiopia and the King of the North(Irak).

In the Bible Ezekiel chapter 38:5.,
Libya is recorded as going to War against EU.,
the Merchants of Tarsis.,
togheter with Gog(Japan) and Magog(China).

The Cause and Reason for this,
is seen in those Nations actions against Libya just now.

And WHOM could be the LEADER of LIBYA in those Wars ?.

So as it seemes,
the West will lose this conflict they have started agaist Libya.

Arn.Sweden.

NATO states could become targets? As opposed to what? Unintentional or accidental targets like Lockerbie? Gaddafi is a prick!
(Ian, UK, 23 June 2011 12:53)

Just for the record, Gaddafi, Al-Quaida, Taliban, Hamas, Hezbollah and any other Arab organization, Serbia is not a member of nato or the eu. Serbia does not participate in "the new world order". As far as Serbia is concerned, what you do in your lands is your business NOT Serbia's.
I suggest you start with this sanctimonious "prick" who pretends to speak for the uk.

Gaddafi lives in his own world, which doesn't necessarily correspond in any way with the reality. The time of this dictator is already over, it's only him who didn't recognize it yet.

What a liar: he already claimed that he had shot down several choppers, airplanes and a battle ship!

As president Regan was correctly calling him: 'the crazy guy from Tripoli' did his show again.

It is embarrassing for the Libyan ppl to have such a pagliaccio to represent them in the world.

(Bardhyl, 23 June 2011 12:32)
He has. It’s not a claim but a fact that several aircraft and helicopters have been shot down, but the “free western press” seems to have not reported theses facts.

(Analyst, 23 June 2011 18:58)

That is the funny thing about Gaddaffi – he is neither crazy nor incompetent – your media may portray him as such but that is not the case. Your US leadership fits that description not the old Colonel. You do not survive for 40 years by being stupid.
(Ian, UK, 23 June 2011 12:53)
Here is some news fore you Ian. Gaddafii is in the process of making the UK beggars lols,lols
(Bob, 24 June 2011 07:33)
NATO would have invaded a long time ago if it was not a little problem of CASH. Gaddafi is doing a great job of flooding the EU with thjousdands of refugees.
NATO is a “dead man walking” mate.

NATO have developed a computer system that monitors sites like this and automatically generates pro-NATO comments (and negative comments for NATO’s enemies). Reading some of the comments below I think we can detect this automatic system at work.

Well NATO countries are engaging in terrorism - dropping bombs on the people and the countries' infrastructure every day. The NATO countries are happy to destroy others and have no casualties of their own, but if NATO countries were made to pay they'd have second thoughts about constantly bullying and terrorizing other countries.

Action against this selfish dictator is by UN resolution and under those terms the NATO action is limited in its nature.

If Gadaffi did commit any act of war against any NATO member state, the rules of engagement would change immediately.

I think that NATO would welcome the opportunity and excuse to intervene at ground level.

However, if that happened it would not necessarily be NATO troops who would go against him, it would be those people of Libya who are fed up with this awful tyrant who would be finally be given the tanks and other weapons they need to eliminate Gadaffi and his cronies.

NATO states could become targets? As opposed to what? Unintentional or accidental targets like Lockerbie? Gaddafi is a prick!
(Ian, UK, 23 June 2011 12:53)

Dictators usually omit things that don't help them.

Arn. Sweden,

In which bible have you read that mentions the EU? Was it possibly a Serbian bible!

Just for the record, Gaddafi, Al-Quaida, Taliban, Hamas, Hezbollah and any other Arab organization, Serbia is not a member of nato or the eu. Serbia does not participate in "the new world order". As far as Serbia is concerned, what you do in your lands is your business NOT Serbia's.
I suggest you start with this sanctimonious "prick" who pretends to speak for the uk.
(JohnBoy, 23 June 2011 19:54)

Come again? What has Serbia got to do with any of this? I know the West is guilty of double standards but so is Gaddafi, he too is a murderer. It is rather amusing when a murder accuses another of murder. It is rather amusing when a dictator plays the victim.

You do realise that Mr Peace Loving Gaddafi gave funds and arms to the IRA so that they could plant bombs across England and Northern Ireland. Now I've always been sympathetic to the idea of a united Ireland as are many British people, however we're not exactly the biggest fans of the IRA; I understand that for a Serb like you it must be hard for you to accept that non-Muslim terrorists do exist (ETA too). In December 1988 Gaddafi had 32 British people killed in an aeroplane and another 11 on the ground killed in Lockerbie; now if take this into account with Gaddafi's arming and funding of the IRA you can kind of understand why Gaddafi isn't exactly Mr Popular in Britain. Arguably Gaddafi is indirectly responsible for the deaths of almost 2,000 people in Britain and Ireland, as well as being directly responsible for the for the death of 43 British people in the Lockerbie bombing as well as the deaths of another 227 people during the Lockerbie bombing, mainly Americans.

This is why I find it rather hypocritical of Gaddafi to shout "murder".

But let me guess, you're one of Gaddafi's fans and admirers?

The world doesn't need any evidence of civilian casualties to admit that the war against Libya hasn't got anything to do with helping Libyan people, but to help the oil companies and the forces behind them.
The millions dead in Iraq and Afghanistan are more than enough to persuade any person on earth what are the intentions of the western powers in those countries.

It's also amazing that ordinary people in the west are staying silent in view of the carnage committed in Libya on their name.
Unless Western leaders held accountable for their crimes and brough to justice there will be more of the same in the near future.

NATO states could become targets? As opposed to what? Unintentional or accidental targets like Lockerbie? Gaddafi is a prick!

What a liar: he already claimed that he had shot down several choppers, airplanes and a battle ship!

As president Regan was correctly calling him: 'the crazy guy from Tripoli' did his show again.

It is embarrassing for the Libyan ppl to have such a pagliaccio to represent them in the world.

Gaddafi lives in his own world, which doesn't necessarily correspond in any way with the reality. The time of this dictator is already over, it's only him who didn't recognize it yet.

Future of Libya !.

In the Bible Daniel chapter 11:43.,
Libya is recorded as going to War against Egypt,
togheter with Ethiopia and the King of the North(Irak).

In the Bible Ezekiel chapter 38:5.,
Libya is recorded as going to War against EU.,
the Merchants of Tarsis.,
togheter with Gog(Japan) and Magog(China).

The Cause and Reason for this,
is seen in those Nations actions against Libya just now.

And WHOM could be the LEADER of LIBYA in those Wars ?.

So as it seemes,
the West will lose this conflict they have started agaist Libya.

Arn.Sweden.

NATO states could become targets? As opposed to what? Unintentional or accidental targets like Lockerbie? Gaddafi is a prick!
(Ian, UK, 23 June 2011 12:53)

Just for the record, Gaddafi, Al-Quaida, Taliban, Hamas, Hezbollah and any other Arab organization, Serbia is not a member of nato or the eu. Serbia does not participate in "the new world order". As far as Serbia is concerned, what you do in your lands is your business NOT Serbia's.
I suggest you start with this sanctimonious "prick" who pretends to speak for the uk.

Action against this selfish dictator is by UN resolution and under those terms the NATO action is limited in its nature.

If Gadaffi did commit any act of war against any NATO member state, the rules of engagement would change immediately.

I think that NATO would welcome the opportunity and excuse to intervene at ground level.

However, if that happened it would not necessarily be NATO troops who would go against him, it would be those people of Libya who are fed up with this awful tyrant who would be finally be given the tanks and other weapons they need to eliminate Gadaffi and his cronies.

NATO states could become targets? As opposed to what? Unintentional or accidental targets like Lockerbie? Gaddafi is a prick!
(Ian, UK, 23 June 2011 12:53)

Dictators usually omit things that don't help them.

Arn. Sweden,

In which bible have you read that mentions the EU? Was it possibly a Serbian bible!

Just for the record, Gaddafi, Al-Quaida, Taliban, Hamas, Hezbollah and any other Arab organization, Serbia is not a member of nato or the eu. Serbia does not participate in "the new world order". As far as Serbia is concerned, what you do in your lands is your business NOT Serbia's.
I suggest you start with this sanctimonious "prick" who pretends to speak for the uk.
(JohnBoy, 23 June 2011 19:54)

Come again? What has Serbia got to do with any of this? I know the West is guilty of double standards but so is Gaddafi, he too is a murderer. It is rather amusing when a murder accuses another of murder. It is rather amusing when a dictator plays the victim.

You do realise that Mr Peace Loving Gaddafi gave funds and arms to the IRA so that they could plant bombs across England and Northern Ireland. Now I've always been sympathetic to the idea of a united Ireland as are many British people, however we're not exactly the biggest fans of the IRA; I understand that for a Serb like you it must be hard for you to accept that non-Muslim terrorists do exist (ETA too). In December 1988 Gaddafi had 32 British people killed in an aeroplane and another 11 on the ground killed in Lockerbie; now if take this into account with Gaddafi's arming and funding of the IRA you can kind of understand why Gaddafi isn't exactly Mr Popular in Britain. Arguably Gaddafi is indirectly responsible for the deaths of almost 2,000 people in Britain and Ireland, as well as being directly responsible for the for the death of 43 British people in the Lockerbie bombing as well as the deaths of another 227 people during the Lockerbie bombing, mainly Americans.

This is why I find it rather hypocritical of Gaddafi to shout "murder".

But let me guess, you're one of Gaddafi's fans and admirers?

NATO have developed a computer system that monitors sites like this and automatically generates pro-NATO comments (and negative comments for NATO’s enemies). Reading some of the comments below I think we can detect this automatic system at work.

Gaddafi is well within his rights to say such a comment as the action over Libya is a regime change supported by other governments mainly from Europe and the USA, for whatever motive we will see only in the future. Perhaps some military bases. Maybe some people may comment over the legality of such an operation.
The entire situation is a disgrace and is only a showroom for the French Rafale and the Eurofighter to pursuade the Indian airforce to purchase their 126 plus aircraft, what lovely timing.

Well NATO countries are engaging in terrorism - dropping bombs on the people and the countries' infrastructure every day. The NATO countries are happy to destroy others and have no casualties of their own, but if NATO countries were made to pay they'd have second thoughts about constantly bullying and terrorizing other countries.

(Bardhyl, 23 June 2011 12:32)
He has. It’s not a claim but a fact that several aircraft and helicopters have been shot down, but the “free western press” seems to have not reported theses facts.

(Analyst, 23 June 2011 18:58)

That is the funny thing about Gaddaffi – he is neither crazy nor incompetent – your media may portray him as such but that is not the case. Your US leadership fits that description not the old Colonel. You do not survive for 40 years by being stupid.
(Ian, UK, 23 June 2011 12:53)
Here is some news fore you Ian. Gaddafii is in the process of making the UK beggars lols,lols
(Bob, 24 June 2011 07:33)
NATO would have invaded a long time ago if it was not a little problem of CASH. Gaddafi is doing a great job of flooding the EU with thjousdands of refugees.
NATO is a “dead man walking” mate.