GRUK
pre 12 godina
To rote and the Brit:
The Munich agreement and the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact are not comparable. Neither are the motives of USSR and Britain.
Within months of the Munich Agreement, Chamberlain was replaced. He died out of office and in disgrace. His policy of Appeasement was much hated and is seen by many to be Britain’s greatest mistake. Chamberlains policy was torn up and Appeasement was seen for what it was – a futile attempt to manage a fascist bully. After Germany invaded Poland, Britain and France demanded she remove all her forces from Poland, otherwise they would use force to come to the assistance of Poland. When Hitler refused, Britain and France declared war on Germany.
For the USSR, the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact seemed to motivated entirely by Siviet self interest and, importantly, territorial gain. Unlike Chamberlain, Stalin was strengthened by his pact with the fascists and remained in power until his death.
Perhaps more importantly, Britain did not seek to gain territory by way of the Munich agreement. Not so the USSR. The pact expressly provided for territorial gains for the USSR. We all know that fascist Germany invaded Poland in September 1939. Some prefer to ignore that the USSR, with Germanys approval, invaded and occupied eastern Poland, the Baltic States and others areas at the same time. The Baltic States remained occupied for the next five decades.
The Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact enabled fascist Germany to cause havoc, murder and misery throughout Europe. By not needing to secure her Eastern front, fascist Germany was comforted, safe in the knowledge that the USSR would not come to any victims assistance. And they did not. Not until her new friends, fascist Germany turned on USSR. Only then did USSR act.
Peace and respect!
GRUK
24 Komentari
Sortiraj po: