Jovan
pre 12 godina
@Amer:
I am afraid you are wrong.
the socalled Visegrad group, or the Visegrad four, how you put it, and indeed some do it call that way too, was aimed at supporting and enhancing further european integrations back in 1991, respectively 1993 after the dissolution of Czechoslovakia.
so, what you have written, that their purpose is to establish a special bond to the USofA, well, you may go on believing that, but the mere fact that Poland is taking over the leadership of that socalled Battlegroup, which is not foreseen by NATO-command-structures, speaks for a clearly different development than you might wish to realize it.
>>" This was a Havel initiative, and he certainly wasn't one to turn his back on the Americans."
you might be wrong here, too. but that´s not that important, actually.
the mere fact, that they agreed to form a battlegroup under polish leadership, is a very interesting development, since it shows that they do not trust the USofA in terms of staying their close ally against Russia in the future and in regard to possible changes, geopolitical changes between the US and Russia.
they, my dear Amer, are much smarter than the average k-albanian kiddie in here, who is not getting tired of repeating the rather naive mantra of "friendship" between the USofA and "kosovaaah".
given that the USofA have let down a lot of their "friends" before, for instance the Shah in Persia, or the Mossadegh-Regime in the latter Iran or even Saddam Hussein in Iraq, you should rather be concerned calling the US your "friends", I guess.
that the ministers of the V4 agreed to hold military execises under the "auspices of NATO Response Force" how it is written in the wikipedia-article about the Visegrad Group is more of kinda "make up" to let it look like everything is fine.
but actually, NATO is weakended by this move, since the Battlegroup-idea is not in the interest of the USofA for obvious reasons. what they want and what NATO is based on is a central command. well, and there we have the loss of authority of the USofA. I hope you understand what I am telling you, without jumping around and rejecting the use of your own brains...
furthermore, there is something else, I would call a good development:
german chancellor Mrs.Merkel, who in the wake of the japanese fukushima-disaster has now chosen to abandon nuclear power in Germany by 2022, has paved the way for a much more profound change in europe than many do realize today. that means a clear shift in energy politics and a further opening to renewable energies and at the same time an opening towards energy deliveries from the east, and I think I do not have to explain to you, who that might be that is sitting on enormous energy-resources.
and since the development in Germany might be interesting for other european countries too, whose populations do not wish to extend nuclear energy in their countries, (if the exit from nuclear power in Germany proves to be feasible, and for now, there is no reason to believe it´s not) that could lead to a much better situation in terms of international security than NATO is currently offering.
my dear friend Amer, you´re not only wrong in regard to the Visegrad four, you also do not see that things are developing, and I do not see that the USofA will be the eternal "friend" of Germany when it comes to the question of the own energy supply.
I´ll cut it short now: the Visegrad Group´s military reasserting is certainly not a glamourous victory for the USofA. and, wow, they are offering some F-16 jets? well then, everything will be fine, right?
you wish.
69 Komentari
Sortiraj po: