food for thought
pre 12 godina
"The SRS leader now faces the same charges for revealing the names of 11 protected witnesses."
Revealing names of witnesses? Similar methods as Thaci uses with his threatening to release 'helpers lists'
(Analyst, 22 May 2011 17:41)
While I think you are attempting to show a bias against the SRS leader lets see where your bias is.
Apparently you feel Thaci is wrong even though he is not under indictment and should be punished.
What are your independent feelings about Seselj, should he be convicted and punished for revealing the names, without tying it to Thaci. However, should you say no then you cannot defend your position on Thaci.
Of course this brings to light another question, if Serb's believe that Thaci already knows the names of those who could testify against him, why the smokescreen of claiming EULEX cannot do so because they do not have an adequate witness protection program.
Should Thaci be the heinous monster you want him to be, would these people not already be dead if he knows who they are??
3 Komentari
Sortiraj po: