Jack M Samardzija
pre 13 godina
Today's Tribunal's ruling in respect of show cause notice by V.Seselj and his legal team was more then just a ruling by the composition of Judges, presiding Judge has gone outside usual form seen to date when explaining the verdict in Seselj's application for dismissal off all charges due to insufficient evidence produced by the prosecution.
Mere fact that presiding Judge openly explained his position and more particularly his non agreement to most points that the other two judges had to say, whilst i am of legal opinion that prosecution has in no way produced credible evidence during the whole process, on the other hand it was evident that judge Latancie was pre-programed against Seselj from the start hence her judgment reflected that , judge Harcroft is a true gentlemen, not saying much but still young enough to be rewarded and promoted by his masters after completion of his services in tribunal.
We all know that in process of any kind the least expected is that it must seem to be fair and just, considering the words of judge Antoneti one could hardly come to conclusion that process and fairness of the other two judges are to say the least questionable. Should this trial have taken place in UK or US no contaminated evidence could be brought before the court, no corrupt witnesses could take a stand, and no prosecution team could get away with coaching and bribing witnesses to lie on the stand.
Due to the fact that judges Latancie and Harcroft have allowed this puts their credebility in question, would judge Harcroft allow such evidence in British court, no he would not, question of legal value is why not?
Judge Latancie is very inteligent and capable judge, there is no question that she can be promoted to anything higher that where she is now (due to her age) so unlike judge Harcroft she could not fall in the same category.
Judge Antoneli has proved to the legal community around the globe that he was not some lackie put in place to serve and obey with no respect to the law it self, his material will be read for generations at Harvard, Oxford, Cambridge and other quality institutions, whilst on the other hand if i was either judge Latancie or Harcroft i would consider very carefully my position and what legal legacy i would leave behind me, and what my children and grandchildren would inherit from my professional legal conduct.
I am in no way defending Seselj i would have the same stand for any other defendant considering the case and material that prosecution has produced, so considering cause of trial to date and most importantly today ruling with public written exclusions by the presiding judge there is no doubt in my mind that continuance of the trial will in no way not be adversely affected by the outcome. Judges Latancie and Harcroft have in no way proved their ability to absorb amount of material produced at the trial or alternatively they have acted on instructions from someone higher up.
Legal process in UK and US does not recognize political influence in any way,so generations to come will see and recognize which of the above mentioned categories these two judges fall in, if i was in their position and their age i would invest in my integrity and my legacy and not in tribunal which is being closed in 2 years.
Then again this is me, during the continuance of the trial we shall see
14 Komentari
Sortiraj po: