Milan
pre 13 godina
"I just want to remind everyone that, on October 1, 1991 Dubrovnik was attacked by JNA and lasted for seven months, damaging 56% of its buildings to some degree, as the historic walled city, a UNESCO world heritage site.
(D. Milisic, 7 April 2011 21:21)"
You do not have to expect an apology from Serbia because the ones mainly responsible already apologized (or were the Serbs guilty anyway because they are Serbs?).
"On my own behalf and on behalf of all the citizens of Montenegro I want to apologise to all citizens of Croatia, particularly in Konavli and Dubrovnik for all the pain and material damage inflicted by any member of the Montenegrin people," President Djukanovic told his Croatian counterpart."
I am still confused about one thing (about many things, but I will focus on this one). "After the war, the ICTY accused the Croatian Republic of Herzeg-Bosnia leadership for the crimes against humanity and other war crimes during the war, including the destruction of the Stari Most bridge."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mostar
So destroying the Stari Most bridge is a war crime and damaging 56% of Dubrovnik is not? And if it is a war crime, how come Djukanovic got away with it by simply apologizing? Fortunately we all know the answers to that million dollar question.
8 Komentari
Sortiraj po: