NATO: Operation in Libya could last 90 days

90 days eh? Sounds familiar. And proves that what they did to us was a practice run for future enedavors.
(highduke, 26 March 2011, 14:57)

Your brother Gaddafi is going down and under.

90 days eh? Sounds familiar. And proves that what they did to us was a practice run for future enedavors.
(highduke, 26 March 2011, 14:57)

Your brother Gaddafi is going down and under.
Agim Kelmendi

Agim in 90 days they will be able to do a lot of "softening up" of highduke's brothers forces just like they did in 78 days with brother Milosevic's forces.

90 days eh? Sounds familiar. And proves that what they did to us was a practice run for future enedavors.

More like 10 years and 90 days. NATO are still in KiM and how many years have gone by?

Agim in 90 days they will be able to do a lot of "softening up" of highduke's brothers forces just like they did in 78 days with brother Milosevic's forces.
(Joe, 26 March 2011 19:36)

Firstly, I wouldn’t rejoice too quickly because once the opposition is gone then why should they keep on giving you a good standard of living? Secondly, this action is racking up an even bigger debt on a country that is creaking at the seams carrying IOUs around.
For everyday they carry out this new mission the US will have to reduce services and cut deeper into future budgets. You have States closing schools, sacking teachers and police and combining hospital services “to create better efficiencies”, a euphemism for closing down hospitals.
This new military activity is another attempt to restart the US economy – the 600 billion effort has failed.

NATO+civil war/numbers
=humanitarian war crimes+BS
I.e. a festering mess. Nul points for the great civilizations.

"More like 10 years and 90 days. NATO are still in KiM and how many years have gone by?
Zoran

The longer the better. As for Kosovo they have to stay their for a long time to protect it

"I wouldn’t rejoice too quickly because once the opposition is gone then why should they keep on giving you a good standard of living?"
sj

Don't wary about my standard of living. It is very confortable without extravagancies. If I would have remained in Western Europe my living standard would have remained incomparatively lower. Everything is so much expensive there - most things cost twice as much - and people are making less money. Here in the US things are not rosy and will hardly get better for a long time but still better than in most of Europe. What happened in both places is that people lived over their means, governments disregarded huge deficit accumulations and people started to think that this "dolce vita" can last for ever. Currently it is time of reckoning, belttightening even for government workers, who got spoiled over the years.

90 days eh? Sounds familiar. And proves that what they did to us was a practice run for future enedavors.

More like 10 years and 90 days. NATO are still in KiM and how many years have gone by?

90 days eh? Sounds familiar. And proves that what they did to us was a practice run for future enedavors.
(highduke, 26 March 2011, 14:57)

Your brother Gaddafi is going down and under.

90 days eh? Sounds familiar. And proves that what they did to us was a practice run for future enedavors.
(highduke, 26 March 2011, 14:57)

Your brother Gaddafi is going down and under.
Agim Kelmendi

Agim in 90 days they will be able to do a lot of "softening up" of highduke's brothers forces just like they did in 78 days with brother Milosevic's forces.

NATO+civil war/numbers
=humanitarian war crimes+BS
I.e. a festering mess. Nul points for the great civilizations.

"More like 10 years and 90 days. NATO are still in KiM and how many years have gone by?
Zoran

The longer the better. As for Kosovo they have to stay their for a long time to protect it

Agim in 90 days they will be able to do a lot of "softening up" of highduke's brothers forces just like they did in 78 days with brother Milosevic's forces.
(Joe, 26 March 2011 19:36)

Firstly, I wouldn’t rejoice too quickly because once the opposition is gone then why should they keep on giving you a good standard of living? Secondly, this action is racking up an even bigger debt on a country that is creaking at the seams carrying IOUs around.
For everyday they carry out this new mission the US will have to reduce services and cut deeper into future budgets. You have States closing schools, sacking teachers and police and combining hospital services “to create better efficiencies”, a euphemism for closing down hospitals.
This new military activity is another attempt to restart the US economy – the 600 billion effort has failed.

"I wouldn’t rejoice too quickly because once the opposition is gone then why should they keep on giving you a good standard of living?"
sj

Don't wary about my standard of living. It is very confortable without extravagancies. If I would have remained in Western Europe my living standard would have remained incomparatively lower. Everything is so much expensive there - most things cost twice as much - and people are making less money. Here in the US things are not rosy and will hardly get better for a long time but still better than in most of Europe. What happened in both places is that people lived over their means, governments disregarded huge deficit accumulations and people started to think that this "dolce vita" can last for ever. Currently it is time of reckoning, belttightening even for government workers, who got spoiled over the years.