4

Thursday, 13.01.2011.

15:38

Armenia to boycott PACE session Karabakh talks

Armenia will boycott renewed discussions on the Nagorny Karabakh conflict at the Council of Europe's Parliamentary Assembly (PACE).

Izvor: RFE/RL

Armenia to boycott PACE session Karabakh talks IMAGE SOURCE
IMAGE DESCRIPTION

4 Komentari

Sortiraj po:

Ataman

pre 13 godina

Azeris aren't arabs, they're an iranian people, which is a completely different thing. I'm with the Armenians on this one, however - an extraordinary little nation and one worth preserving.
(Dave, 14 January 2011 11:21)

This is closer, but probably still not 100% correct. There weren't any "Azeris" before 1917, it's an artificial creation of later times. Azeri language is very close to Turkish

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azerbaijani_language

They aren't Iranians, you confused that there is Azeri minority in Iran.

Before 1917 they were considered just "Turkoman" people.

I am clearly on the Armenian side for many reasons, the main one is the Turkish genocide and of course that Armenians (as well of Georgians) are traditionally Russian allies - even if certain modern Georgian politicians lost their brain and implanted their tongue between the gluteus maximus cheeks of Uncle Sam.

Preporučujem 1 Ne preporučujem 1
Dave

pre 13 godina

Azeris aren't arabs, they're an iranian people, which is a completely different thing. I'm with the Armenians on this one, however - an extraordinary little nation and one worth preserving.

Preporučujem 1 Ne preporučujem 0
Je¿ nigerski

pre 13 godina

Does Serbia support the orthodox brothers of Armenia or the muslim arabs of Azerbaijan?
(Mark, 13 January 2011 18:35)

Serbia would rather support Armenians, I guess. For sure no one on Planet Earth supports "muslim arabs of Azerbaijan": they are as numerous, as Buddhist Eskimos of Nigeria. You can guess, why.

Preporučujem 6 Ne preporučujem 1
Je¿ nigerski

pre 13 godina

Does Serbia support the orthodox brothers of Armenia or the muslim arabs of Azerbaijan?
(Mark, 13 January 2011 18:35)

Serbia would rather support Armenians, I guess. For sure no one on Planet Earth supports "muslim arabs of Azerbaijan": they are as numerous, as Buddhist Eskimos of Nigeria. You can guess, why.

Preporučujem 6 Ne preporučujem 1
Dave

pre 13 godina

Azeris aren't arabs, they're an iranian people, which is a completely different thing. I'm with the Armenians on this one, however - an extraordinary little nation and one worth preserving.

Preporučujem 1 Ne preporučujem 0
Ataman

pre 13 godina

Azeris aren't arabs, they're an iranian people, which is a completely different thing. I'm with the Armenians on this one, however - an extraordinary little nation and one worth preserving.
(Dave, 14 January 2011 11:21)

This is closer, but probably still not 100% correct. There weren't any "Azeris" before 1917, it's an artificial creation of later times. Azeri language is very close to Turkish

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azerbaijani_language

They aren't Iranians, you confused that there is Azeri minority in Iran.

Before 1917 they were considered just "Turkoman" people.

I am clearly on the Armenian side for many reasons, the main one is the Turkish genocide and of course that Armenians (as well of Georgians) are traditionally Russian allies - even if certain modern Georgian politicians lost their brain and implanted their tongue between the gluteus maximus cheeks of Uncle Sam.

Preporučujem 1 Ne preporučujem 1
Je¿ nigerski

pre 13 godina

Does Serbia support the orthodox brothers of Armenia or the muslim arabs of Azerbaijan?
(Mark, 13 January 2011 18:35)

Serbia would rather support Armenians, I guess. For sure no one on Planet Earth supports "muslim arabs of Azerbaijan": they are as numerous, as Buddhist Eskimos of Nigeria. You can guess, why.

Preporučujem 6 Ne preporučujem 1
Ataman

pre 13 godina

Azeris aren't arabs, they're an iranian people, which is a completely different thing. I'm with the Armenians on this one, however - an extraordinary little nation and one worth preserving.
(Dave, 14 January 2011 11:21)

This is closer, but probably still not 100% correct. There weren't any "Azeris" before 1917, it's an artificial creation of later times. Azeri language is very close to Turkish

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azerbaijani_language

They aren't Iranians, you confused that there is Azeri minority in Iran.

Before 1917 they were considered just "Turkoman" people.

I am clearly on the Armenian side for many reasons, the main one is the Turkish genocide and of course that Armenians (as well of Georgians) are traditionally Russian allies - even if certain modern Georgian politicians lost their brain and implanted their tongue between the gluteus maximus cheeks of Uncle Sam.

Preporučujem 1 Ne preporučujem 1
Dave

pre 13 godina

Azeris aren't arabs, they're an iranian people, which is a completely different thing. I'm with the Armenians on this one, however - an extraordinary little nation and one worth preserving.

Preporučujem 1 Ne preporučujem 0