Defense minister: Serbia isn’t threatened

Defense minister: Serbia isn’t threatened B92

Serbia isn't threatened?

The huge part of our country is under NATO occupation right now.

"When reading the Wikileaks when Kostunica was leader then it was obvious Serbia still had a backbone."
(Zoran, 12 December 2010 12:24)

Oh, you mean not cooperating with the ICTY and not trying to arrest alleged war criminals though their whereabout was known (happened under Kostunica) is having a backbone? Interesting :-)

He pointed out, however, that there was a latent possibility of security threats coming from individuals from Kosovo.


How in the world one individual or let say 100 individuals can be a threat to a country with 8 mil population???
Nothing but contradictions coming from Serbian leadership, day day out. When will they learn to say the truth and nothing but the truth?

The reality is that Serbia is in fact occupied by NATO forces while Tadic and SuNATOvac are working towards joining this aggression pact against the will of Serbians.

If we can take information coming from Wikileaks as advice, where the Hague instructed Serbia to start changing the opinions of Serbians regarding the arrest of Mladic then we can also assume that instructions are coming from Washington to attempt changing those opinions towards NATO.

NATO is very unpopular and the sooner it leaves Serbian territory the better. Here is spineless Tadic's opinion from Wikileaks:

8. (SBU) Asked about the President’s views on Serbia’s relations with NATO, Ratkovic said that as a former Minister of Defense, President Tadic knows the issue well. Tadic believes that Serbia cannot remain outside of NATO forever, but doesn’t say this often because of the political sensitivity of the issue.

It's time for Tadic, SuNATOvac and the sell-outs to go. When reading the Wikileaks when Kostunica was leader then it was obvious Serbia still had a backbone.

I think B92 should cut the comments rather to make those stupid.

The rest of the Job is very well done.

Thanks.

What's more important: pride, or a safe country with a prosperous economy and good living standards?

Who invited this russian here?

They all love to post russian bs that no one can read nor understand or talk about how "russia is a continent" (yes I've heard this on multiple events).

B92 IS KILLING MY COMMENTS!!!

Let's try to fix this one...

----------------------------

What's more important: pride, or a safe country with a prosperous economy and good living standards?
(Ari Gold, 12 December 2010 15:03)

You choose!

If you choose pride you're poor with your wife fighting for better future.

If you choose everything else than your boss "talking" to your wife every evening as providing you safety, prosperity and good living standards.
(ZMAJ, 12 December 2010 15:52)

Is that better B92?

I'm afraid I'll start to speak like that in my private life any more..

1) I am sorry - 15% if the country is not "huge".
(Ёж-шутник, 12 December 2010 16:53)

If you loose your hand, that would be about 15%, Isn't that huge loss?

I can otherwise suggest you another part to consider., in amount (I don't know) 2-5%.. I mean, that would be really HUGE. (

Don't you agree with that?

What's more important: pride, or a safe country with a prosperous economy and good living standards?
(Ari Gold, 12 December 2010 15:03)

You choose!

If you choose pride you're poor with your wife fighting for better future.

If you choose everything else than your boss is providing you safety, prosperity and good living standards.

KOSO

And just who invited you Albanians here? You all love to spam and post provocative insults here and we all no is bs, got nothing better to do?

This is a Serbian news site after all... extremely liberal though it may be.

UN RES;1244 is slowly moving forward unto it's other policies.

Serb forces re-instated in Pristina.

Pride and freedom any day. That is the Serbian way. There is no life in slavery even if it brings perceived security.

If you loose your hand, that would be about 15%, Isn't that huge loss?

Don't you agree with that?
(ZMAJ, 12 December 2010 17:43)

If you read the #2 about children playing at wedding, you can guess was I sarcastic or not about 15%. But tsk, tsk, today are very democratic elections, be quiet and see who will win: a godfather or a крыша-Berisha.

The huge part of our country is under NATO occupation right now.
(ZMAJ, 12 December 2010 14:57)

1) I am sorry - 15% if the country is not "huge".

2) The occupation is benevolent. It is about how to protect Serbs efficiently from little kids attending wedding and doing some mischief. There were a lot of weddings in 2004.

3) "Шут" = "clown" or, better, "jester" in Russian, "шутка" = joke.

http://caricatura.ru/parad/kondenko/2411

(NATO is on the left, probably).

For everyone's entertainment - here are some B92-ers listed out:

http://www.diary.ru/~ShadowNightMoon/p67388818.htm?from=0
http://www.diary.ru/~ShadowNightMoon/p67391878.htm?from=0

Most Albanian posters fall in this category:

http://www.webpark.ru/uploads52/071121/inet_warrior_31.jpg

Who invited this russian here?
(KOSO, 12 December 2010 18:05)

I did invite. Was the Qindarka coin made of paper - or is it the 5 Lekë? Coins made of paper fall slowly, take extra time.

"And just who invited you Albanians here?"

Someone doesn't understand the concept of "public forum"

What's more important: pride, or a safe country with a prosperous economy and good living standards?
(Ari Gold, 12 December 2010 15:03)

The entire question is wrong and there is no proper answer to it.

Pride in what? A country? Your safety is only as good as your liberty.
If there is no liberty, you have three choices:

a) move your butt somewhere else (I am a coward and lazy - so I prefer it)

b) if there is no "somewhere else" - build your defenses against your environment and wall-in (mentally or even physically). This was the "preferred" way of life in the Soviet Union. And now the "preferred way" of life in North Korea. That's how people live there.

c) You hope that your defenses are strong. Unfortunately sometimes (see Warsaw Ghetto) the pressure is to strong and your civic defense line is to weak. That's when people take AK-47 and hand-grenades. I will try to get the liberty that way. I would really hate it tough (since I am a coward). And I know that chances of survival are minimal. But I also know, there is no d).

Prosperous economy is not possible without liberties. That takes you back to a) and b) and c).

I know what K-Albanians will say. The problem lies that they served the interests of a world power, not for self-defense. The state of Kosovo in 2010 is the proof. Also their situation was infinitely better than of others in ex-Socialist countries.

@Take a hike

if you are afraid of non serb visitors go ahead and tell b92 to stop spamming itself on google news...and making an english version of the site...

ah, but how then will they send out state run propaganda meant for a non-serb audience without it?

They all love to post russian bs that no one can read nor understand or talk about how "russia is a continent" (yes I've heard this on multiple events).
(KOSO, 12 December 2010 18:05)

I am sure, ZMAJ can read. The post was in large degree to him. Just tell, when the 5 Lek coin arrived at the destination.

Serb forces re-instated in Pristina.
(trudsaam, 13 December 2010 00:01)

Dream on! You can come to Pristina without serbian forces.

If you loose your hand, that would be about 15%, Isn't that huge loss?

I can otherwise suggest you another part to consider., in amount (I don't know) 2-5%.. I mean, that would be really HUGE. (

Don't you agree with that?
(ZMAJ, 12 December 2010 17:43)

It's not yours so you really don't know.

@Take a hike

if you are afraid of non serb visitors go ahead and tell b92 to stop spamming itself on google news...and making an english version of the site...

ah, but how then will they send out state run propaganda meant for a non-serb audience without it?
(AdamNYC, 13 December 2010 02:05)
======================

Funny, you Albanians can object to Russians posting here but if someone questions why you are here you get angry.
You keep proving time and time again that you are hypocrites.

UN RES;1244 is slowly moving forward unto it's other policies.

Serb forces re-instated in Pristina.
(trudsaam, 13 December 2010 00:01)
Of course your statement is only meant to incite emotions as there is no way you could believe there will ever be Serbian forces in Kosovo again.
UNSC was designed to keep them out and only allow them back in for menial jobs at most.
Even if you got your wish of "more than autonomy but less than independence" that could only be true without Serbian forces, other wise it would not be autonomous.

We are here to comment on a story about Kosova (you know the province that is 95% Albanian) and its perceived threat to Serbia's security.

As for the comment about Serb forces in Prishtina if they dare they'll meet the same fate that the Americans troops in Fallujah did.
(Zoti, 13 December 2010 22:13)

I'm glad you're afraid.

I'm glad you confess it's our- Serbian province.

I'm glad you're slowly showing the real face of your respect to "your friends", the American troops..

Slowly, slowly this game is coming to an end and that's obvious from all of your comments.

It's even possible that you'll throw flowers on our troops and put a bronze statue of..- Vuk Jeremic over there.

It's difficult to live in fear, isn't it?

Funny, you Albanians can object to Russians posting here but if someone questions why you are here you get angry.
You keep proving time and time again that you are hypocrites.
(peggy, 13 December 2010)

We are here to comment on a story about Kosova (you know the province that is 95% Albanian) and its perceived threat to Serbia's security.

As for the comment about Serb forces in Prishtina if they dare they'll meet the same fate that the Americans troops in Fallujah did.

He pointed out, however, that there was a latent possibility of security threats coming from individuals from Kosovo.


How in the world one individual or let say 100 individuals can be a threat to a country with 8 mil population???
Nothing but contradictions coming from Serbian leadership, day day out. When will they learn to say the truth and nothing but the truth?

Defense minister: Serbia isn’t threatened B92

Serbia isn't threatened?

The huge part of our country is under NATO occupation right now.

The reality is that Serbia is in fact occupied by NATO forces while Tadic and SuNATOvac are working towards joining this aggression pact against the will of Serbians.

If we can take information coming from Wikileaks as advice, where the Hague instructed Serbia to start changing the opinions of Serbians regarding the arrest of Mladic then we can also assume that instructions are coming from Washington to attempt changing those opinions towards NATO.

NATO is very unpopular and the sooner it leaves Serbian territory the better. Here is spineless Tadic's opinion from Wikileaks:

8. (SBU) Asked about the President’s views on Serbia’s relations with NATO, Ratkovic said that as a former Minister of Defense, President Tadic knows the issue well. Tadic believes that Serbia cannot remain outside of NATO forever, but doesn’t say this often because of the political sensitivity of the issue.

It's time for Tadic, SuNATOvac and the sell-outs to go. When reading the Wikileaks when Kostunica was leader then it was obvious Serbia still had a backbone.

Pride and freedom any day. That is the Serbian way. There is no life in slavery even if it brings perceived security.

"When reading the Wikileaks when Kostunica was leader then it was obvious Serbia still had a backbone."
(Zoran, 12 December 2010 12:24)

Oh, you mean not cooperating with the ICTY and not trying to arrest alleged war criminals though their whereabout was known (happened under Kostunica) is having a backbone? Interesting :-)

Who invited this russian here?

They all love to post russian bs that no one can read nor understand or talk about how "russia is a continent" (yes I've heard this on multiple events).

B92 IS KILLING MY COMMENTS!!!

Let's try to fix this one...

----------------------------

What's more important: pride, or a safe country with a prosperous economy and good living standards?
(Ari Gold, 12 December 2010 15:03)

You choose!

If you choose pride you're poor with your wife fighting for better future.

If you choose everything else than your boss "talking" to your wife every evening as providing you safety, prosperity and good living standards.
(ZMAJ, 12 December 2010 15:52)

Is that better B92?

I'm afraid I'll start to speak like that in my private life any more..

What's more important: pride, or a safe country with a prosperous economy and good living standards?

What's more important: pride, or a safe country with a prosperous economy and good living standards?
(Ari Gold, 12 December 2010 15:03)

You choose!

If you choose pride you're poor with your wife fighting for better future.

If you choose everything else than your boss is providing you safety, prosperity and good living standards.

The huge part of our country is under NATO occupation right now.
(ZMAJ, 12 December 2010 14:57)

1) I am sorry - 15% if the country is not "huge".

2) The occupation is benevolent. It is about how to protect Serbs efficiently from little kids attending wedding and doing some mischief. There were a lot of weddings in 2004.

3) "Шут" = "clown" or, better, "jester" in Russian, "шутка" = joke.

http://caricatura.ru/parad/kondenko/2411

(NATO is on the left, probably).

For everyone's entertainment - here are some B92-ers listed out:

http://www.diary.ru/~ShadowNightMoon/p67388818.htm?from=0
http://www.diary.ru/~ShadowNightMoon/p67391878.htm?from=0

Most Albanian posters fall in this category:

http://www.webpark.ru/uploads52/071121/inet_warrior_31.jpg

UN RES;1244 is slowly moving forward unto it's other policies.

Serb forces re-instated in Pristina.

They all love to post russian bs that no one can read nor understand or talk about how "russia is a continent" (yes I've heard this on multiple events).
(KOSO, 12 December 2010 18:05)

I am sure, ZMAJ can read. The post was in large degree to him. Just tell, when the 5 Lek coin arrived at the destination.

Who invited this russian here?
(KOSO, 12 December 2010 18:05)

I did invite. Was the Qindarka coin made of paper - or is it the 5 Lekë? Coins made of paper fall slowly, take extra time.

KOSO

And just who invited you Albanians here? You all love to spam and post provocative insults here and we all no is bs, got nothing better to do?

This is a Serbian news site after all... extremely liberal though it may be.

@Take a hike

if you are afraid of non serb visitors go ahead and tell b92 to stop spamming itself on google news...and making an english version of the site...

ah, but how then will they send out state run propaganda meant for a non-serb audience without it?

I think B92 should cut the comments rather to make those stupid.

The rest of the Job is very well done.

Thanks.

What's more important: pride, or a safe country with a prosperous economy and good living standards?
(Ari Gold, 12 December 2010 15:03)

The entire question is wrong and there is no proper answer to it.

Pride in what? A country? Your safety is only as good as your liberty.
If there is no liberty, you have three choices:

a) move your butt somewhere else (I am a coward and lazy - so I prefer it)

b) if there is no "somewhere else" - build your defenses against your environment and wall-in (mentally or even physically). This was the "preferred" way of life in the Soviet Union. And now the "preferred way" of life in North Korea. That's how people live there.

c) You hope that your defenses are strong. Unfortunately sometimes (see Warsaw Ghetto) the pressure is to strong and your civic defense line is to weak. That's when people take AK-47 and hand-grenades. I will try to get the liberty that way. I would really hate it tough (since I am a coward). And I know that chances of survival are minimal. But I also know, there is no d).

Prosperous economy is not possible without liberties. That takes you back to a) and b) and c).

I know what K-Albanians will say. The problem lies that they served the interests of a world power, not for self-defense. The state of Kosovo in 2010 is the proof. Also their situation was infinitely better than of others in ex-Socialist countries.

1) I am sorry - 15% if the country is not "huge".
(Ёж-шутник, 12 December 2010 16:53)

If you loose your hand, that would be about 15%, Isn't that huge loss?

I can otherwise suggest you another part to consider., in amount (I don't know) 2-5%.. I mean, that would be really HUGE. (

Don't you agree with that?

If you loose your hand, that would be about 15%, Isn't that huge loss?

Don't you agree with that?
(ZMAJ, 12 December 2010 17:43)

If you read the #2 about children playing at wedding, you can guess was I sarcastic or not about 15%. But tsk, tsk, today are very democratic elections, be quiet and see who will win: a godfather or a крыша-Berisha.

"And just who invited you Albanians here?"

Someone doesn't understand the concept of "public forum"

Serb forces re-instated in Pristina.
(trudsaam, 13 December 2010 00:01)

Dream on! You can come to Pristina without serbian forces.

If you loose your hand, that would be about 15%, Isn't that huge loss?

I can otherwise suggest you another part to consider., in amount (I don't know) 2-5%.. I mean, that would be really HUGE. (

Don't you agree with that?
(ZMAJ, 12 December 2010 17:43)

It's not yours so you really don't know.

Funny, you Albanians can object to Russians posting here but if someone questions why you are here you get angry.
You keep proving time and time again that you are hypocrites.
(peggy, 13 December 2010)

We are here to comment on a story about Kosova (you know the province that is 95% Albanian) and its perceived threat to Serbia's security.

As for the comment about Serb forces in Prishtina if they dare they'll meet the same fate that the Americans troops in Fallujah did.

UN RES;1244 is slowly moving forward unto it's other policies.

Serb forces re-instated in Pristina.
(trudsaam, 13 December 2010 00:01)
Of course your statement is only meant to incite emotions as there is no way you could believe there will ever be Serbian forces in Kosovo again.
UNSC was designed to keep them out and only allow them back in for menial jobs at most.
Even if you got your wish of "more than autonomy but less than independence" that could only be true without Serbian forces, other wise it would not be autonomous.

@Take a hike

if you are afraid of non serb visitors go ahead and tell b92 to stop spamming itself on google news...and making an english version of the site...

ah, but how then will they send out state run propaganda meant for a non-serb audience without it?
(AdamNYC, 13 December 2010 02:05)
======================

Funny, you Albanians can object to Russians posting here but if someone questions why you are here you get angry.
You keep proving time and time again that you are hypocrites.

We are here to comment on a story about Kosova (you know the province that is 95% Albanian) and its perceived threat to Serbia's security.

As for the comment about Serb forces in Prishtina if they dare they'll meet the same fate that the Americans troops in Fallujah did.
(Zoti, 13 December 2010 22:13)

I'm glad you're afraid.

I'm glad you confess it's our- Serbian province.

I'm glad you're slowly showing the real face of your respect to "your friends", the American troops..

Slowly, slowly this game is coming to an end and that's obvious from all of your comments.

It's even possible that you'll throw flowers on our troops and put a bronze statue of..- Vuk Jeremic over there.

It's difficult to live in fear, isn't it?