"Croatia tolerant toward own war crimes"

(jb, 9 December 2010 12:44)

Yes, it was the nasty Serbs all along, but you have no idea what’s going to happen to Croatia in the future and I’ll not spoil it for you, but it not going to be very nice. New world order coming along and your protectors the US will not be around and the Vatican is busy sucking up to the Russians. Think about it for a moment.

the croation army, muslim army, nato etc were only defending themselves, so everyone agreed that this was needed to protect themselves against the other side. this is backed up by the evil side who committed such a huge number of attrocities and needed a world court to incriminate the evil people. hence the 90/10 rule in force.

"During the 1991-1995 war, both the Serbs and Croats committed atrocities against civilians, but many Croats still believe they were only defending their homes from "Serb aggressors", rather than committing war crimes."

Just like many Serbs still believer THE WEST is responsible for the wars in EX-YU, and Slobodan Milosevic and his supporters were only "defending" Serbia/Yugoslavia/whatever and didn't commit war crimes. Both groups of people were brainwashed.

And what about the "Operation Storm" - And compliance with the Hague. Or will this go away once a member of EU!

This country is the perfect candidate for the eu next year. Soon, they will be wearing lightning bolt helmets with their lederhosen.

Just in case....., can't imagine when the real stuff will come out and give some clarity on the balkan war. Surely some politicians in Europe and in the US are starting sweating badly...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/09/wikileaks-uk-us-croatia-accession

When it comes to Croatia allegedly being tolerant of war crimes what's the reason? Is it because Croatia deems itself a victim of Serb aggression or alleged Serb aggression in the duration of the 1991-1995 conflict? As a matter of fact I should ask was the 1990s armed conflict between Croatia & Serbia the result of Serbia wanting to avenge the mistreatment of its citizens by the Croats during World War 2? I'd appreciate a response preferably a polite response considering that it's not my intention to start an argument. Thanks.

the croation army, muslim army, nato etc were only defending themselves, so everyone agreed that this was needed to protect themselves against the other side. this is backed up by the evil side who committed such a huge number of attrocities and needed a world court to incriminate the evil people. hence the 90/10 rule in force.
(jb, 9 December 2010 12:44)
=======================

I see you still live in the matrix.

the croation army, muslim army, nato etc were only defending themselves, so everyone agreed that this was needed to protect themselves against the other side. this is backed up by the evil side who committed such a huge number of attrocities and needed a world court to incriminate the evil people. hence the 90/10 rule in force.

(jb, 9 December 2010 12:44)

Yes, it was the nasty Serbs all along, but you have no idea what’s going to happen to Croatia in the future and I’ll not spoil it for you, but it not going to be very nice. New world order coming along and your protectors the US will not be around and the Vatican is busy sucking up to the Russians. Think about it for a moment.

"During the 1991-1995 war, both the Serbs and Croats committed atrocities against civilians, but many Croats still believe they were only defending their homes from "Serb aggressors", rather than committing war crimes."

Just like many Serbs still believer THE WEST is responsible for the wars in EX-YU, and Slobodan Milosevic and his supporters were only "defending" Serbia/Yugoslavia/whatever and didn't commit war crimes. Both groups of people were brainwashed.

Just in case....., can't imagine when the real stuff will come out and give some clarity on the balkan war. Surely some politicians in Europe and in the US are starting sweating badly...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/09/wikileaks-uk-us-croatia-accession

the croation army, muslim army, nato etc were only defending themselves, so everyone agreed that this was needed to protect themselves against the other side. this is backed up by the evil side who committed such a huge number of attrocities and needed a world court to incriminate the evil people. hence the 90/10 rule in force.
(jb, 9 December 2010 12:44)
=======================

I see you still live in the matrix.

And what about the "Operation Storm" - And compliance with the Hague. Or will this go away once a member of EU!

This country is the perfect candidate for the eu next year. Soon, they will be wearing lightning bolt helmets with their lederhosen.

When it comes to Croatia allegedly being tolerant of war crimes what's the reason? Is it because Croatia deems itself a victim of Serb aggression or alleged Serb aggression in the duration of the 1991-1995 conflict? As a matter of fact I should ask was the 1990s armed conflict between Croatia & Serbia the result of Serbia wanting to avenge the mistreatment of its citizens by the Croats during World War 2? I'd appreciate a response preferably a polite response considering that it's not my intention to start an argument. Thanks.