Serbia could see freezing of integrations

Like I commented on the "Deadline" story today, here is another EU talking head reiterating the importance of Mladic's capture, unbelievable. As for getting the experts from both sides, Belgrade and Pristina, to begin the negotiations, I am laughing again. Who exactly may those Albanian political experts be?

Enough already with threats. It's time for the EU countries to prosecute their armed services members for the NATO action against civilian targets in 1999. Once they do that, then the can whine about Mladic and Hazdic.

Who the hell is Doris Pack and what right does she have to hold an entire nation to ransom. Irrelevant, petty, overpaid Eurocrats spouting off again. Who elects these people. One of them recently spouted off at Sarkozy for having the temerity to remove Romanian fraudsters from France. She was told to shut up and promptly disappeared. Pity one can't do the same with Pack et al.

Geez... she even has her own website: http://www.dorispack.de/

Maybe we should all follow her on Twitter?

Doris Pack is another one of those useless euro politicians who speak like an old-fashioned broken record. In other words, she is one of Tadic's euro-idols.

I am laughing again. Who exactly may those Albanian political experts be?"
(winston, 27 October 2010 14:30)

Winston,

You can pick and choose because that would be "you Serbian democracy". In fact you never needed democracy)))

Allow the others to laugh please))

Who the hell is Doris Pack and what right does she have to hold an entire nation to ransom. Irrelevant, petty, overpaid Eurocrats spouting off again. Who elects these people. One of them recently spouted off at Sarkozy for having the temerity to remove Romanian fraudsters from France. She was told to shut up and promptly disappeared. Pity one can't do the same with Pack et al.
(Pete, 27 October 2010 16:52)

She is a German EU parlamentarian. She has the right to keep the entire nation of Serbia at ransom for as long as Germany keeps the state of Serbia alive, through the vast amount of money it gives Serbia through the EU, World Bank, IMF.

You're doing it again, johny. Would you like to explain a bit more about the "vast amount of money" that Germany and these other organisations give to "keep Serbia alive"? Or are you just trolling? It's the latter, isn't it?

@Dave.Fresh from B92

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/business-article.php?yyyy=2010&mm=10&dd=28&nav_id=70562

@Dave.Fresh from B92

[link]
(Mark, 28 October 2010 18:27)
==================

Most of it is loans and some donations from non specified sources.

How does this make Germany the good guy who is supporting Serbia?

How does this make Germany the good guy who is supporting Serbia?
(Peggy, 29 October 2010 00:04)

That is not Germany's burden. You needed help in getting financial relief; Germany is providing that help in terms of monetary help. It is not up to Germany to decide how this monetary help is construed in Serbia since Serbia itself begged for money and financial help.

How does this make Germany the good guy who is supporting Serbia?
(Peggy, 29 October 2010 00:04)

That is not Germany's burden. You needed help in getting financial relief; Germany is providing that help in terms of monetary help. It is not up to Germany to decide how this monetary help is construed in Serbia since Serbia itself begged for money and financial help.
(johny, 1 November 2010 02:04)
==================

Johny if you are not going answer any questions then please stop posting. You are very annoying.

You stated that Germany is giving aid to Serbia and I said that that "aid" is a loan not aid.
My question then was how is Germany being seen as a good guy helping Serbia when it is not aid but a loan.
Your answer was it is not Germany's burden or how Serbia uses that money.

When did I EVER say that is was Germany's burden? Go on, find where I have said that.
Your hatred has no place here. We are here seriously debating issues and all you do is twist and distort in order to look superior.

Enough already with threats. It's time for the EU countries to prosecute their armed services members for the NATO action against civilian targets in 1999. Once they do that, then the can whine about Mladic and Hazdic.

Doris Pack is another one of those useless euro politicians who speak like an old-fashioned broken record. In other words, she is one of Tadic's euro-idols.

Like I commented on the "Deadline" story today, here is another EU talking head reiterating the importance of Mladic's capture, unbelievable. As for getting the experts from both sides, Belgrade and Pristina, to begin the negotiations, I am laughing again. Who exactly may those Albanian political experts be?

Who the hell is Doris Pack and what right does she have to hold an entire nation to ransom. Irrelevant, petty, overpaid Eurocrats spouting off again. Who elects these people. One of them recently spouted off at Sarkozy for having the temerity to remove Romanian fraudsters from France. She was told to shut up and promptly disappeared. Pity one can't do the same with Pack et al.
(Pete, 27 October 2010 16:52)

She is a German EU parlamentarian. She has the right to keep the entire nation of Serbia at ransom for as long as Germany keeps the state of Serbia alive, through the vast amount of money it gives Serbia through the EU, World Bank, IMF.

I am laughing again. Who exactly may those Albanian political experts be?"
(winston, 27 October 2010 14:30)

Winston,

You can pick and choose because that would be "you Serbian democracy". In fact you never needed democracy)))

Allow the others to laugh please))

Who the hell is Doris Pack and what right does she have to hold an entire nation to ransom. Irrelevant, petty, overpaid Eurocrats spouting off again. Who elects these people. One of them recently spouted off at Sarkozy for having the temerity to remove Romanian fraudsters from France. She was told to shut up and promptly disappeared. Pity one can't do the same with Pack et al.

You're doing it again, johny. Would you like to explain a bit more about the "vast amount of money" that Germany and these other organisations give to "keep Serbia alive"? Or are you just trolling? It's the latter, isn't it?

@Dave.Fresh from B92

[link]
(Mark, 28 October 2010 18:27)
==================

Most of it is loans and some donations from non specified sources.

How does this make Germany the good guy who is supporting Serbia?

Geez... she even has her own website: http://www.dorispack.de/

Maybe we should all follow her on Twitter?

@Dave.Fresh from B92

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/business-article.php?yyyy=2010&mm=10&dd=28&nav_id=70562

How does this make Germany the good guy who is supporting Serbia?
(Peggy, 29 October 2010 00:04)

That is not Germany's burden. You needed help in getting financial relief; Germany is providing that help in terms of monetary help. It is not up to Germany to decide how this monetary help is construed in Serbia since Serbia itself begged for money and financial help.

How does this make Germany the good guy who is supporting Serbia?
(Peggy, 29 October 2010 00:04)

That is not Germany's burden. You needed help in getting financial relief; Germany is providing that help in terms of monetary help. It is not up to Germany to decide how this monetary help is construed in Serbia since Serbia itself begged for money and financial help.
(johny, 1 November 2010 02:04)
==================

Johny if you are not going answer any questions then please stop posting. You are very annoying.

You stated that Germany is giving aid to Serbia and I said that that "aid" is a loan not aid.
My question then was how is Germany being seen as a good guy helping Serbia when it is not aid but a loan.
Your answer was it is not Germany's burden or how Serbia uses that money.

When did I EVER say that is was Germany's burden? Go on, find where I have said that.
Your hatred has no place here. We are here seriously debating issues and all you do is twist and distort in order to look superior.