"Do you mean to tell me that corruption is more rampant in Serbia than in Albania? Our Serb posters here claim quite the opposite. How is this possible?
(johny, 26 October 2010 22:15) "
The scoring is confusing: a high numerical score is good (10 is perfect) while a high number for the ranking is bad (1 is good - Denmark, 179 is very bad - Somalia).
Albania improved its score (to 3.3), but is still behind Serbia (3.5), which has remained the same for the past few years. Montenegro is at 3.7, perhaps a result of the effort to meet EU accession standards. What really stands out is how similar the results are for all the countries of the region, EU and non-EU alike.
Do you mean to tell me that corruption is more rampant in Serbia than in Albania? Our Serb posters here claim quite the opposite. How is this possible?
It's been a bad year for almost everybody - wars and financial crises are horrible for attempts to fight corruption.
Serbia's absolute score did not change, but it improved its ranking from 83rd last year to 78th this year, meaning, I guess, that simply not sliding was an achievement in 2009-2010.
Albania actually improved its score (3.2 to 3.3) and moved up 8 places, to right behind Serbia in the regional ranking.
Kosovo finally got rated by 3 institutions, meaning it could be ranked for the first time. 2.8 is not good (good laws, bad judiciary), but it's in the middle of the regional class (Eastern Europe and Central Asia).
"Transparency Serbia Program Director Nemanja Nenadić said that Kosovo was included in the research for the first time this year, and added that, with CPI at 2.8, it ranked between 110th and 150th on the list. "
It ranked at 110th - where did this "between" business come from?
It's been a bad year for almost everybody - wars and financial crises are horrible for attempts to fight corruption.
Serbia's absolute score did not change, but it improved its ranking from 83rd last year to 78th this year, meaning, I guess, that simply not sliding was an achievement in 2009-2010.
Albania actually improved its score (3.2 to 3.3) and moved up 8 places, to right behind Serbia in the regional ranking.
Kosovo finally got rated by 3 institutions, meaning it could be ranked for the first time. 2.8 is not good (good laws, bad judiciary), but it's in the middle of the regional class (Eastern Europe and Central Asia).
"Transparency Serbia Program Director Nemanja Nenadić said that Kosovo was included in the research for the first time this year, and added that, with CPI at 2.8, it ranked between 110th and 150th on the list. "
It ranked at 110th - where did this "between" business come from?
Do you mean to tell me that corruption is more rampant in Serbia than in Albania? Our Serb posters here claim quite the opposite. How is this possible?
"Do you mean to tell me that corruption is more rampant in Serbia than in Albania? Our Serb posters here claim quite the opposite. How is this possible?
(johny, 26 October 2010 22:15) "
The scoring is confusing: a high numerical score is good (10 is perfect) while a high number for the ranking is bad (1 is good - Denmark, 179 is very bad - Somalia).
Albania improved its score (to 3.3), but is still behind Serbia (3.5), which has remained the same for the past few years. Montenegro is at 3.7, perhaps a result of the effort to meet EU accession standards. What really stands out is how similar the results are for all the countries of the region, EU and non-EU alike.
It's been a bad year for almost everybody - wars and financial crises are horrible for attempts to fight corruption.
Serbia's absolute score did not change, but it improved its ranking from 83rd last year to 78th this year, meaning, I guess, that simply not sliding was an achievement in 2009-2010.
Albania actually improved its score (3.2 to 3.3) and moved up 8 places, to right behind Serbia in the regional ranking.
Kosovo finally got rated by 3 institutions, meaning it could be ranked for the first time. 2.8 is not good (good laws, bad judiciary), but it's in the middle of the regional class (Eastern Europe and Central Asia).
"Transparency Serbia Program Director Nemanja Nenadić said that Kosovo was included in the research for the first time this year, and added that, with CPI at 2.8, it ranked between 110th and 150th on the list. "
It ranked at 110th - where did this "between" business come from?
Do you mean to tell me that corruption is more rampant in Serbia than in Albania? Our Serb posters here claim quite the opposite. How is this possible?
"Do you mean to tell me that corruption is more rampant in Serbia than in Albania? Our Serb posters here claim quite the opposite. How is this possible?
(johny, 26 October 2010 22:15) "
The scoring is confusing: a high numerical score is good (10 is perfect) while a high number for the ranking is bad (1 is good - Denmark, 179 is very bad - Somalia).
Albania improved its score (to 3.3), but is still behind Serbia (3.5), which has remained the same for the past few years. Montenegro is at 3.7, perhaps a result of the effort to meet EU accession standards. What really stands out is how similar the results are for all the countries of the region, EU and non-EU alike.
IMAGE SOURCE
5 Komentari
Sortiraj po: