5

Monday, 25.10.2010.

11:19

"State never negotiated Mladić surrender"

Rasim Ljajić, who heads a council for Hague cooperation, says Serbia's authorities have never negotiated with Ratko Mladić regarding his surrender.

Izvor: B92

"State never negotiated Mladiæ surrender" IMAGE SOURCE
IMAGE DESCRIPTION

5 Komentari

Sortiraj po:

johny

pre 13 godina

, why weren't you all up in arms when the war criminal Ceku was not handed over to Serbia on Interpol arrest warrants? Could you possibly be prejudiced?
(winston, 25 October 2010 20:58)

Tha Hague never issued an arrest warrant for Ceku. That is what matters here. Serbi has issued arrest warrants for Clinton, Blair and Albright as well. In the eyes of the rest of the community of countries neither of them just like Ceku are guilty. Meaning the world considers these arrest warrants issued by Serbia a bad joke. The question you should ask is why did not Putin arrest Ceku and hand it over to Serbia when he met Ceku in Mosocow? Could he possibly be prejudiced? Or maybe, just maybe, you are prejudiced and you buy all the non-sense and bitterns Belgrade spews.

winston

pre 13 godina

Don't get your panties in a bunch, PRN. Tadic recently stated that there was no political will, before his coalition government, to catch Mladic. So what are you all petturbed about? I am sure that Ratko will be apprehended handed and turned over to authorities in time. BTW, Milosevic was considered the Butcher of the Balkans - and another note, why weren't you all up in arms when the war criminal Ceku was not handed over to Serbia on Interpol arrest warrants? Could you possibly be prejudiced?

PRN

pre 13 godina

"State never negotiated Mladić surrender"

O please stop with these lies.

In 2007 Serbian government was saying we knew where Mladic was staying in 2004...but for 'some' reasons (because the Butcher in Serbia is considered a hero, and rewarded) we couldn't catch him

In 2010 Serbian government is saying we knew where Mladic was staying in 2008...but for 'some' reasons we couldn't catch him...

Guess what Serbian government will say in 2012..."we knew where Mladic was staying in 2010...but again for 'some' reasons we couldn't catch him...

PRN

pre 13 godina

"State never negotiated Mladić surrender"

O please stop with these lies.

In 2007 Serbian government was saying we knew where Mladic was staying in 2004...but for 'some' reasons (because the Butcher in Serbia is considered a hero, and rewarded) we couldn't catch him

In 2010 Serbian government is saying we knew where Mladic was staying in 2008...but for 'some' reasons we couldn't catch him...

Guess what Serbian government will say in 2012..."we knew where Mladic was staying in 2010...but again for 'some' reasons we couldn't catch him...

winston

pre 13 godina

Don't get your panties in a bunch, PRN. Tadic recently stated that there was no political will, before his coalition government, to catch Mladic. So what are you all petturbed about? I am sure that Ratko will be apprehended handed and turned over to authorities in time. BTW, Milosevic was considered the Butcher of the Balkans - and another note, why weren't you all up in arms when the war criminal Ceku was not handed over to Serbia on Interpol arrest warrants? Could you possibly be prejudiced?

johny

pre 13 godina

, why weren't you all up in arms when the war criminal Ceku was not handed over to Serbia on Interpol arrest warrants? Could you possibly be prejudiced?
(winston, 25 October 2010 20:58)

Tha Hague never issued an arrest warrant for Ceku. That is what matters here. Serbi has issued arrest warrants for Clinton, Blair and Albright as well. In the eyes of the rest of the community of countries neither of them just like Ceku are guilty. Meaning the world considers these arrest warrants issued by Serbia a bad joke. The question you should ask is why did not Putin arrest Ceku and hand it over to Serbia when he met Ceku in Mosocow? Could he possibly be prejudiced? Or maybe, just maybe, you are prejudiced and you buy all the non-sense and bitterns Belgrade spews.

PRN

pre 13 godina

"State never negotiated Mladić surrender"

O please stop with these lies.

In 2007 Serbian government was saying we knew where Mladic was staying in 2004...but for 'some' reasons (because the Butcher in Serbia is considered a hero, and rewarded) we couldn't catch him

In 2010 Serbian government is saying we knew where Mladic was staying in 2008...but for 'some' reasons we couldn't catch him...

Guess what Serbian government will say in 2012..."we knew where Mladic was staying in 2010...but again for 'some' reasons we couldn't catch him...

winston

pre 13 godina

Don't get your panties in a bunch, PRN. Tadic recently stated that there was no political will, before his coalition government, to catch Mladic. So what are you all petturbed about? I am sure that Ratko will be apprehended handed and turned over to authorities in time. BTW, Milosevic was considered the Butcher of the Balkans - and another note, why weren't you all up in arms when the war criminal Ceku was not handed over to Serbia on Interpol arrest warrants? Could you possibly be prejudiced?

johny

pre 13 godina

, why weren't you all up in arms when the war criminal Ceku was not handed over to Serbia on Interpol arrest warrants? Could you possibly be prejudiced?
(winston, 25 October 2010 20:58)

Tha Hague never issued an arrest warrant for Ceku. That is what matters here. Serbi has issued arrest warrants for Clinton, Blair and Albright as well. In the eyes of the rest of the community of countries neither of them just like Ceku are guilty. Meaning the world considers these arrest warrants issued by Serbia a bad joke. The question you should ask is why did not Putin arrest Ceku and hand it over to Serbia when he met Ceku in Mosocow? Could he possibly be prejudiced? Or maybe, just maybe, you are prejudiced and you buy all the non-sense and bitterns Belgrade spews.