"Destroying ethnic identity" (whatever that means) has little to do with anarchism. Anarchists are anti-nationalists and anti-racists. They believe in co-operation and solidarity, across cultural lines. If one understand culture and ethnicity to be an open and fluid experience then anarchists are some of its biggest proponents.
If, however, "ethnicity" is simply a byword for the sort of politics which plagued the Balkans and Serbia, in particular, during the 90s then yes...such a concept, such a movement needs to be opposed and, indeed, destroyed lest it destroy us all first.
Between two extremists, there can be no winner but I cannot understand how anyone can seriously advocate Anarchism. While NeoNazis are misguided and want to promote national interests at the expense of minorities, Anarchists want to destroy any vestige of ethnic identity among ALL ethnicities, which makes them the most insidious.
Between two extremists, there can be no winner but I cannot understand how anyone can seriously advocate Anarchism. While NeoNazis are misguided and want to promote national interests at the expense of minorities, Anarchists want to destroy any vestige of ethnic identity among ALL ethnicities, which makes them the most insidious.
"Destroying ethnic identity" (whatever that means) has little to do with anarchism. Anarchists are anti-nationalists and anti-racists. They believe in co-operation and solidarity, across cultural lines. If one understand culture and ethnicity to be an open and fluid experience then anarchists are some of its biggest proponents.
If, however, "ethnicity" is simply a byword for the sort of politics which plagued the Balkans and Serbia, in particular, during the 90s then yes...such a concept, such a movement needs to be opposed and, indeed, destroyed lest it destroy us all first.
Between two extremists, there can be no winner but I cannot understand how anyone can seriously advocate Anarchism. While NeoNazis are misguided and want to promote national interests at the expense of minorities, Anarchists want to destroy any vestige of ethnic identity among ALL ethnicities, which makes them the most insidious.
"Destroying ethnic identity" (whatever that means) has little to do with anarchism. Anarchists are anti-nationalists and anti-racists. They believe in co-operation and solidarity, across cultural lines. If one understand culture and ethnicity to be an open and fluid experience then anarchists are some of its biggest proponents.
If, however, "ethnicity" is simply a byword for the sort of politics which plagued the Balkans and Serbia, in particular, during the 90s then yes...such a concept, such a movement needs to be opposed and, indeed, destroyed lest it destroy us all first.
IMAGE SOURCE
4 Komentari
Sortiraj po: