Not only is Krstic innocent now he has to endure islamic/british abuse.
(Mikael C, 9 May 2010 09:24)
He was sentenced to over 30 years because he was innocent.
You do realize that if the prosecution doesn't have evidence then he wouldn't of been prosecuted. But they had a TON of it, so he got over 30 years.
I am appalled, that you would call him innocent. Whats next, Radovan Karidzic is innocent too?
His attorney said he did not do anything to provokethe attack, didn't this attorny also proclaim his innocence at the Hague.
I think we should take his word on it.
His attorney said he did not do anything to provokethe attack, didn't this attorny also proclaim his innocence at the Hague.
I think we should take his word on it.
Not only is Krstic innocent now he has to endure islamic/british abuse.
(Mikael C, 9 May 2010 09:24)
He was sentenced to over 30 years because he was innocent.
You do realize that if the prosecution doesn't have evidence then he wouldn't of been prosecuted. But they had a TON of it, so he got over 30 years.
I am appalled, that you would call him innocent. Whats next, Radovan Karidzic is innocent too?
His attorney said he did not do anything to provokethe attack, didn't this attorny also proclaim his innocence at the Hague.
I think we should take his word on it.
Not only is Krstic innocent now he has to endure islamic/british abuse.
(Mikael C, 9 May 2010 09:24)
He was sentenced to over 30 years because he was innocent.
You do realize that if the prosecution doesn't have evidence then he wouldn't of been prosecuted. But they had a TON of it, so he got over 30 years.
I am appalled, that you would call him innocent. Whats next, Radovan Karidzic is innocent too?
IMAGE SOURCE
8 Komentari
Sortiraj po: