Muslim leader rejects declaration

PRN-is that the same unbiased court where of the 1130 years handed out for crimes during the war, 1120 years have been given to Serbs. Give me a break!

(PRN, 1 April 2010 16:31)

You (together with Zukovic) obviously have no a clue what the word genocide means.

Anyway you would agree with a "black devil" if against Serbia interests, we know that. PRN- you're wasting your time here.

Everybody knows that I'm a moderate but I do wonder whether the guy realises that he is a citizen of Serbia?

On the other hand, he is probably suffering from ethnic disease that is all too common in these parts.

PRN

Here is a definition of genocide:

The deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/genocide

There were about two million (2,000,000) Bosniaks living in Bosnia at the time of the Bosnian War. The Srebrenica Massacre claimed eight thousand (8,000) lives.

This is not even half a percentage of the total population.

So please explain to me how the killing of less than half of a percentage can possibly be the "deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group".

I'd love to see those courts you mentioned answer this question, because if it is a question of numbers (proportion in particular), can you try and imagine how many massacres from the dawn of civilization until the present day could be classified as genocide?

I stand by Serbia's interpretation. The Bosniak guy is throwing the word around because he is sore about what happened at Srebrenica, but it doesn't mean he is right either.

Systemic, planned annihilation of a racial, political, or cultural group - that is webster's definition of genocide. In Srebrenica, only the males, (who many were participants in war crimes against the local Serbian population, both women, children, and men), of a cultural group were allegedly killed, the women and children were bused away to safety. That does not qualify as genocide - as much as Serb haters want it to be. If proven true, then what happened to the Bosniaks in Srebrenica is a war crime - and one that was perpetrated by some Bosnian Serb soldiers, and not by the state of Serbia. I suggest that all ethnicities, including the Bosnian muslims, look in their own yard first, before pointing out the dirt in others'.

so if something is a judicial fact it must be true? I guess that means OJ Simpson never murdered anybody.

I FULLY agree with you Mr. Zukorlić .

Srebrenica genocide is not a matter of anybody's opinion; it's a judicial fact recognized first by the international criminal tribunal for the former yugoslavia and subsequently by the international court of justice.

Period.

We are also waiting for the Bosniak parliment it issue a bill condemning the genocide perpetrated against the Serbs in Sarajevo, Tuzla, Srebrinica, Zepa and Gorazde and many other places in B&H.


As for the Mufti, will he also condemn the genocide commited against the Greeks and Armenians by the Turks between in the early 20th century.

The mufti is completely right, good on him for being one of the few citizens of Serbia to be saying the right thing.

Bganon:

"Everybody knows that I'm a moderate but I do wonder whether the guy realises that he is a citizen of Serbia?"

Bganaon your moderate credentials are well-established, so since when does a "moderate" question the right of a citizen of his/her country to condemn, first and foremost, the unjust actions of THEIR OWN government? Shouldn't he be congratulated precisely as a citizen of Serbia for wanting a stronger, clearer condemnation of the Srebrenica genocide? Or perhaps when you make harsh criticisms of your government you are also forgetting your citizenship?

I FULLY agree with you Mr. Zukorlić .

Srebrenica genocide is not a matter of anybody's opinion; it's a judicial fact recognized first by the international criminal tribunal for the former yugoslavia and subsequently by the international court of justice.

Period.

PRN-is that the same unbiased court where of the 1130 years handed out for crimes during the war, 1120 years have been given to Serbs. Give me a break!

Systemic, planned annihilation of a racial, political, or cultural group - that is webster's definition of genocide. In Srebrenica, only the males, (who many were participants in war crimes against the local Serbian population, both women, children, and men), of a cultural group were allegedly killed, the women and children were bused away to safety. That does not qualify as genocide - as much as Serb haters want it to be. If proven true, then what happened to the Bosniaks in Srebrenica is a war crime - and one that was perpetrated by some Bosnian Serb soldiers, and not by the state of Serbia. I suggest that all ethnicities, including the Bosnian muslims, look in their own yard first, before pointing out the dirt in others'.

PRN

Here is a definition of genocide:

The deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/genocide

There were about two million (2,000,000) Bosniaks living in Bosnia at the time of the Bosnian War. The Srebrenica Massacre claimed eight thousand (8,000) lives.

This is not even half a percentage of the total population.

So please explain to me how the killing of less than half of a percentage can possibly be the "deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group".

I'd love to see those courts you mentioned answer this question, because if it is a question of numbers (proportion in particular), can you try and imagine how many massacres from the dawn of civilization until the present day could be classified as genocide?

I stand by Serbia's interpretation. The Bosniak guy is throwing the word around because he is sore about what happened at Srebrenica, but it doesn't mean he is right either.

(PRN, 1 April 2010 16:31)

You (together with Zukovic) obviously have no a clue what the word genocide means.

Anyway you would agree with a "black devil" if against Serbia interests, we know that. PRN- you're wasting your time here.

Everybody knows that I'm a moderate but I do wonder whether the guy realises that he is a citizen of Serbia?

On the other hand, he is probably suffering from ethnic disease that is all too common in these parts.

so if something is a judicial fact it must be true? I guess that means OJ Simpson never murdered anybody.

We are also waiting for the Bosniak parliment it issue a bill condemning the genocide perpetrated against the Serbs in Sarajevo, Tuzla, Srebrinica, Zepa and Gorazde and many other places in B&H.


As for the Mufti, will he also condemn the genocide commited against the Greeks and Armenians by the Turks between in the early 20th century.

The mufti is completely right, good on him for being one of the few citizens of Serbia to be saying the right thing.

Bganon:

"Everybody knows that I'm a moderate but I do wonder whether the guy realises that he is a citizen of Serbia?"

Bganaon your moderate credentials are well-established, so since when does a "moderate" question the right of a citizen of his/her country to condemn, first and foremost, the unjust actions of THEIR OWN government? Shouldn't he be congratulated precisely as a citizen of Serbia for wanting a stronger, clearer condemnation of the Srebrenica genocide? Or perhaps when you make harsh criticisms of your government you are also forgetting your citizenship?