In general I agree with what you have put down.However a lot depends on circumstances you keep an animal in.I used to have a syrian golden hamster which was trated like a lord from the very beginning and never expressed any kind of agression during his life.We can also witness the opposite.Just think about hedgehogs.The anyway very friendly animal(we hosted one during a winter because my dog had a special ability of digging them from under the soil and snow) can turn into a confused beast when placed into unnatural conditions(You must have heard about ones taken from central europe to america mainly east coast and the strange behavioural changes they went through)
As long as local hamsters, cuckoo birds and badgers are not planning to build any mosques their animal rights are granted in Switzerland.
(dean SRB, 7 March 2010 15:53)
In West Europe there is no more hamster, they killed them all. Currently they import some live hamsters from Hungary and I think, the ones in Vojvodina sing like Mircea: "Long live EU!!!". Because some going to be re-patriated in France, Belgium, Germany instead of being killed.
This is why I was talking about EU and хрчак rights few days ago.
This does not apply to Roma: while these fine Europeans are so much concerned about the хрчак, the problematic human refugees are being sent home where they live under conditions difficult to describe.
Regardless, that "real" (not pet) хрчак is very-very cute. The problem is, he is much larger than the Syrian one people keep as a pet and he is pretty aggressive.
The origin of the words both ways is Slavic.
1) "хомѣкы" in medieval Russian, in Chruch-Slavonic "хомѣсторъ" did appear in 1073. Is probably related to Persian "hamestār", "vicious enemy" (their character is anything, but peaceful!). Others think, it is related to the verb "хамкать" ( = greedy way of eating). To tell the truth, it's probably the "other" way - ever seen the way a hamster is eating?
2) "хрыч" is a very unfriendly person. Thus, "хрчак", "hörcsög" (in Hungarian).
Both ways it seems our forefathers observed the pretty aggressive character of that animal. If feeling threatened he often attacks, not withdraws. Some of the tactics is to run up the leg and bite between them (ouch!) or use the corn accumulated in cheeks as missile and spit it straight at high repeating speed into attacker's face. (Who said, Soviets invented Kalashnikov?) But if left alone the wild hamsters look really cute!
Certainly the most stupid vote ever that was presented to us.
When I think that 40% of our young people coming out of school have a hard time to find a job, this waste of time and money makes me sick!
As long as local hamsters, cuckoo birds and badgers are not planning to build any mosques their animal rights are granted in Switzerland.
(dean SRB, 7 March 2010 15:53)
In West Europe there is no more hamster, they killed them all. Currently they import some live hamsters from Hungary and I think, the ones in Vojvodina sing like Mircea: "Long live EU!!!". Because some going to be re-patriated in France, Belgium, Germany instead of being killed.
This is why I was talking about EU and хрчак rights few days ago.
This does not apply to Roma: while these fine Europeans are so much concerned about the хрчак, the problematic human refugees are being sent home where they live under conditions difficult to describe.
Regardless, that "real" (not pet) хрчак is very-very cute. The problem is, he is much larger than the Syrian one people keep as a pet and he is pretty aggressive.
The origin of the words both ways is Slavic.
1) "хомѣкы" in medieval Russian, in Chruch-Slavonic "хомѣсторъ" did appear in 1073. Is probably related to Persian "hamestār", "vicious enemy" (their character is anything, but peaceful!). Others think, it is related to the verb "хамкать" ( = greedy way of eating). To tell the truth, it's probably the "other" way - ever seen the way a hamster is eating?
2) "хрыч" is a very unfriendly person. Thus, "хрчак", "hörcsög" (in Hungarian).
Both ways it seems our forefathers observed the pretty aggressive character of that animal. If feeling threatened he often attacks, not withdraws. Some of the tactics is to run up the leg and bite between them (ouch!) or use the corn accumulated in cheeks as missile and spit it straight at high repeating speed into attacker's face. (Who said, Soviets invented Kalashnikov?) But if left alone the wild hamsters look really cute!
Certainly the most stupid vote ever that was presented to us.
When I think that 40% of our young people coming out of school have a hard time to find a job, this waste of time and money makes me sick!
In general I agree with what you have put down.However a lot depends on circumstances you keep an animal in.I used to have a syrian golden hamster which was trated like a lord from the very beginning and never expressed any kind of agression during his life.We can also witness the opposite.Just think about hedgehogs.The anyway very friendly animal(we hosted one during a winter because my dog had a special ability of digging them from under the soil and snow) can turn into a confused beast when placed into unnatural conditions(You must have heard about ones taken from central europe to america mainly east coast and the strange behavioural changes they went through)
As long as local hamsters, cuckoo birds and badgers are not planning to build any mosques their animal rights are granted in Switzerland.
(dean SRB, 7 March 2010 15:53)
In West Europe there is no more hamster, they killed them all. Currently they import some live hamsters from Hungary and I think, the ones in Vojvodina sing like Mircea: "Long live EU!!!". Because some going to be re-patriated in France, Belgium, Germany instead of being killed.
This is why I was talking about EU and хрчак rights few days ago.
This does not apply to Roma: while these fine Europeans are so much concerned about the хрчак, the problematic human refugees are being sent home where they live under conditions difficult to describe.
Regardless, that "real" (not pet) хрчак is very-very cute. The problem is, he is much larger than the Syrian one people keep as a pet and he is pretty aggressive.
The origin of the words both ways is Slavic.
1) "хомѣкы" in medieval Russian, in Chruch-Slavonic "хомѣсторъ" did appear in 1073. Is probably related to Persian "hamestār", "vicious enemy" (their character is anything, but peaceful!). Others think, it is related to the verb "хамкать" ( = greedy way of eating). To tell the truth, it's probably the "other" way - ever seen the way a hamster is eating?
2) "хрыч" is a very unfriendly person. Thus, "хрчак", "hörcsög" (in Hungarian).
Both ways it seems our forefathers observed the pretty aggressive character of that animal. If feeling threatened he often attacks, not withdraws. Some of the tactics is to run up the leg and bite between them (ouch!) or use the corn accumulated in cheeks as missile and spit it straight at high repeating speed into attacker's face. (Who said, Soviets invented Kalashnikov?) But if left alone the wild hamsters look really cute!
Certainly the most stupid vote ever that was presented to us.
When I think that 40% of our young people coming out of school have a hard time to find a job, this waste of time and money makes me sick!
In general I agree with what you have put down.However a lot depends on circumstances you keep an animal in.I used to have a syrian golden hamster which was trated like a lord from the very beginning and never expressed any kind of agression during his life.We can also witness the opposite.Just think about hedgehogs.The anyway very friendly animal(we hosted one during a winter because my dog had a special ability of digging them from under the soil and snow) can turn into a confused beast when placed into unnatural conditions(You must have heard about ones taken from central europe to america mainly east coast and the strange behavioural changes they went through)
IMAGE SOURCE
7 Komentari
Sortiraj po: