The Obama administration’s decision to try the alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks in New York has divided public and political opinion in the United States.
Republicans believe bringing Kahlid Sheikh Mohammed and his four co-accused from Guantanamo into the heart of the city, poses a security risk.
While human rights groups, legal scholars and Democrats claim the decision may help repair America’s image tarnished by rendition, Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo.
B92
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed cannot expect toever receive a fair trial in the US.
Having been illegally detained, tortured and renderd,the US now wants to execute him to save the embarrassment of continued detention at Guatanamo.
Can anybody imagine a US jury allowing him to walk free?
The 9/11 was,in international law, a crime against humanity and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed should've been in the juristiction of
the UN which could have appointed its own judges for the trial.
The UN could also offer the same for Blair, Bush, Cheney and a host of other members of parliament and hangers on
for authorising the slaughter of thousands of Iraqis and Afgans.
It appears, as always, the West acts with hypocrisy and employ dual standards one law for us and 'justice' for them.
Republicans believe bringing Kahlid Sheikh Mohammed and his four co-accused from Guantanamo into the heart of the city, poses a security risk.
While human rights groups, legal scholars and Democrats claim the decision may help repair America’s image tarnished by rendition, Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo.
B92
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed cannot expect toever receive a fair trial in the US.
Having been illegally detained, tortured and renderd,the US now wants to execute him to save the embarrassment of continued detention at Guatanamo.
Can anybody imagine a US jury allowing him to walk free?
The 9/11 was,in international law, a crime against humanity and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed should've been in the juristiction of
the UN which could have appointed its own judges for the trial.
The UN could also offer the same for Blair, Bush, Cheney and a host of other members of parliament and hangers on
for authorising the slaughter of thousands of Iraqis and Afgans.
It appears, as always, the West acts with hypocrisy and employ dual standards one law for us and 'justice' for them.
Republicans believe bringing Kahlid Sheikh Mohammed and his four co-accused from Guantanamo into the heart of the city, poses a security risk.
While human rights groups, legal scholars and Democrats claim the decision may help repair America’s image tarnished by rendition, Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo.
B92
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed cannot expect toever receive a fair trial in the US.
Having been illegally detained, tortured and renderd,the US now wants to execute him to save the embarrassment of continued detention at Guatanamo.
Can anybody imagine a US jury allowing him to walk free?
The 9/11 was,in international law, a crime against humanity and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed should've been in the juristiction of
the UN which could have appointed its own judges for the trial.
The UN could also offer the same for Blair, Bush, Cheney and a host of other members of parliament and hangers on
for authorising the slaughter of thousands of Iraqis and Afgans.
It appears, as always, the West acts with hypocrisy and employ dual standards one law for us and 'justice' for them.
IMAGE SOURCE
2 Komentari
Sortiraj po: