10

Wednesday, 03.06.2009.

20:37

Million-year-old mammoth skeleton found

A skeleton of a mammoth believed to be one million years old was discovered near Kostolac in eastern Serbia.

Izvor: B92

Million-year-old mammoth skeleton found IMAGE SOURCE
IMAGE DESCRIPTION

10 Komentari

Sortiraj po:

bojan

pre 14 godina

it would be stupid for anyone to claim a such thing. however, i would like to point out one thing to you and all the Serbs outhere that no matter what you find or discover in Serbia that dates prior to 1300s you have no connection with it.
(spunky, 4 June 2009 08:34)

1300 minus additional 600 700 years...

Ataman

pre 14 godina

Funny but plenty are also found in Siberia. Coincidence or you brought it with you when you came :-)?
(alban, 4 June 2009 15:58)

At least claim somewhat better, like Hunnic-Sabir overlords originally from Subartu (Caucasus) leading Slavs from Bautzen (Germany) to Balkan. That's (at least) can be sold as "conspiracy theory" or "alternative historical view". The non-alternative one: Croatians are from the area around Kraków (Poland), Serbs from the area around Bautzen-Zgorzelec (Germany-Poland) and no Sabirs from Azerbaijan are involved.

According some other ("alternative") theories, Siberia's name is indeed from Subartu - meaning the wast area "beyond" Subartu. Some other theories connect Sabirs with today's Hungarians, at least with the Megyer tribe and also with ancient land of Sumer.

Fact is, Siberia did not know a single Indo-Iranian speaking tribe till 16th Century, most tribes living there speaking agglutinative languages.

Ossetian, Albanian (here I mean Caucasian Albania), Serbian, Greek, Russian, Shquip, Celtic languages are all part of Indo-Iranian group. Agglutinative languages are Sumerian, Turkish, Mongolian, Hungarian, Finnish, Estonian, Korean, Azeri - but not Tadjik, which is an Iranian dialect or not Lithuanian (an other Indo-Iranian)

Some even say, the original Europeans did speak agglutinative tongue and Indo-Iranians have nothing to do with it, all of them are relatively newcomers: be them Ossets, Russians, Serbs, Shquips, Greeks, Celts, etc.

(You guessed correctly, such ideas are widespread in Turkey, Hungary, Estonia, Finland - but NOT in Greece, Ukraina, Lithuania, Albania)

Ataman

pre 14 godina

These trollings either way remind me of a good Russian joke.

Three men: one Russian, one Georgian and one Armenian argue, what nationality had the monkey who climbed down the tree first.

Russian: "It was a Russian monkey, his name was Gavrila"
Armenian: "It was Armenian monkey, his name was Orangutyan"
Georgian: "It was Georgian monkey, his name was Chimpadze"

Serbs and Albanians are missing from the list. Have no idea what Albanians can do about it, but I am sure the family name of that Gavrila / Orangutyan / Chimpadze was "Majmunovic".

Jokes aside, who claims that Serbs have no history on Balkans prior 13th Century is absolutely wrong.

Besides Albanian history remanufacturing an other entity guilty as charged is the Roman Catholic church. Little is known, a great number of Hungarians as they settled in Carpathian Basin did belong to different Oriental branches of Christian faith as well as Judaism and Zorastrism. But Roman Catholic Church and in particular the German empire did everything to re-write the history.

alban

pre 14 godina

"Oh no!! The K-albanian camp will certainly try to claim it as part of and proof of their 'heritage" now!!"

Funny but plenty are also found in Siberia. Coincidence or you brought it with you when you came :-)? http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/may/04/lubya-preserved-woolly-mammoth-cloning

Michael Thomas

pre 14 godina

Marinel

I am sure the Albanians were in the Balkans before the mammoth. By the way, that Roman stronghold in Viminacium, well that too was Albanian.

Everyone seems to want to claim Albanian culture as their own, even those wretched mammoths.

spunky

pre 14 godina

To: Marinel
hahahahha you made me laugh! you really did! that was funny... it would be stupid for anyone to claim a such thing. however, i would like to point out one thing to you and all the Serbs outhere that no matter what you find or discover in Serbia that dates prior to 1300s you have no connection with it.

Michael Thomas

pre 14 godina

Marinel

I am sure the Albanians were in the Balkans before the mammoth. By the way, that Roman stronghold in Viminacium, well that too was Albanian.

Everyone seems to want to claim Albanian culture as their own, even those wretched mammoths.

spunky

pre 14 godina

To: Marinel
hahahahha you made me laugh! you really did! that was funny... it would be stupid for anyone to claim a such thing. however, i would like to point out one thing to you and all the Serbs outhere that no matter what you find or discover in Serbia that dates prior to 1300s you have no connection with it.

Ataman

pre 14 godina

These trollings either way remind me of a good Russian joke.

Three men: one Russian, one Georgian and one Armenian argue, what nationality had the monkey who climbed down the tree first.

Russian: "It was a Russian monkey, his name was Gavrila"
Armenian: "It was Armenian monkey, his name was Orangutyan"
Georgian: "It was Georgian monkey, his name was Chimpadze"

Serbs and Albanians are missing from the list. Have no idea what Albanians can do about it, but I am sure the family name of that Gavrila / Orangutyan / Chimpadze was "Majmunovic".

Jokes aside, who claims that Serbs have no history on Balkans prior 13th Century is absolutely wrong.

Besides Albanian history remanufacturing an other entity guilty as charged is the Roman Catholic church. Little is known, a great number of Hungarians as they settled in Carpathian Basin did belong to different Oriental branches of Christian faith as well as Judaism and Zorastrism. But Roman Catholic Church and in particular the German empire did everything to re-write the history.

Ataman

pre 14 godina

Funny but plenty are also found in Siberia. Coincidence or you brought it with you when you came :-)?
(alban, 4 June 2009 15:58)

At least claim somewhat better, like Hunnic-Sabir overlords originally from Subartu (Caucasus) leading Slavs from Bautzen (Germany) to Balkan. That's (at least) can be sold as "conspiracy theory" or "alternative historical view". The non-alternative one: Croatians are from the area around Kraków (Poland), Serbs from the area around Bautzen-Zgorzelec (Germany-Poland) and no Sabirs from Azerbaijan are involved.

According some other ("alternative") theories, Siberia's name is indeed from Subartu - meaning the wast area "beyond" Subartu. Some other theories connect Sabirs with today's Hungarians, at least with the Megyer tribe and also with ancient land of Sumer.

Fact is, Siberia did not know a single Indo-Iranian speaking tribe till 16th Century, most tribes living there speaking agglutinative languages.

Ossetian, Albanian (here I mean Caucasian Albania), Serbian, Greek, Russian, Shquip, Celtic languages are all part of Indo-Iranian group. Agglutinative languages are Sumerian, Turkish, Mongolian, Hungarian, Finnish, Estonian, Korean, Azeri - but not Tadjik, which is an Iranian dialect or not Lithuanian (an other Indo-Iranian)

Some even say, the original Europeans did speak agglutinative tongue and Indo-Iranians have nothing to do with it, all of them are relatively newcomers: be them Ossets, Russians, Serbs, Shquips, Greeks, Celts, etc.

(You guessed correctly, such ideas are widespread in Turkey, Hungary, Estonia, Finland - but NOT in Greece, Ukraina, Lithuania, Albania)

alban

pre 14 godina

"Oh no!! The K-albanian camp will certainly try to claim it as part of and proof of their 'heritage" now!!"

Funny but plenty are also found in Siberia. Coincidence or you brought it with you when you came :-)? http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/may/04/lubya-preserved-woolly-mammoth-cloning

bojan

pre 14 godina

it would be stupid for anyone to claim a such thing. however, i would like to point out one thing to you and all the Serbs outhere that no matter what you find or discover in Serbia that dates prior to 1300s you have no connection with it.
(spunky, 4 June 2009 08:34)

1300 minus additional 600 700 years...

spunky

pre 14 godina

To: Marinel
hahahahha you made me laugh! you really did! that was funny... it would be stupid for anyone to claim a such thing. however, i would like to point out one thing to you and all the Serbs outhere that no matter what you find or discover in Serbia that dates prior to 1300s you have no connection with it.

Michael Thomas

pre 14 godina

Marinel

I am sure the Albanians were in the Balkans before the mammoth. By the way, that Roman stronghold in Viminacium, well that too was Albanian.

Everyone seems to want to claim Albanian culture as their own, even those wretched mammoths.

Ataman

pre 14 godina

These trollings either way remind me of a good Russian joke.

Three men: one Russian, one Georgian and one Armenian argue, what nationality had the monkey who climbed down the tree first.

Russian: "It was a Russian monkey, his name was Gavrila"
Armenian: "It was Armenian monkey, his name was Orangutyan"
Georgian: "It was Georgian monkey, his name was Chimpadze"

Serbs and Albanians are missing from the list. Have no idea what Albanians can do about it, but I am sure the family name of that Gavrila / Orangutyan / Chimpadze was "Majmunovic".

Jokes aside, who claims that Serbs have no history on Balkans prior 13th Century is absolutely wrong.

Besides Albanian history remanufacturing an other entity guilty as charged is the Roman Catholic church. Little is known, a great number of Hungarians as they settled in Carpathian Basin did belong to different Oriental branches of Christian faith as well as Judaism and Zorastrism. But Roman Catholic Church and in particular the German empire did everything to re-write the history.

alban

pre 14 godina

"Oh no!! The K-albanian camp will certainly try to claim it as part of and proof of their 'heritage" now!!"

Funny but plenty are also found in Siberia. Coincidence or you brought it with you when you came :-)? http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/may/04/lubya-preserved-woolly-mammoth-cloning

Ataman

pre 14 godina

Funny but plenty are also found in Siberia. Coincidence or you brought it with you when you came :-)?
(alban, 4 June 2009 15:58)

At least claim somewhat better, like Hunnic-Sabir overlords originally from Subartu (Caucasus) leading Slavs from Bautzen (Germany) to Balkan. That's (at least) can be sold as "conspiracy theory" or "alternative historical view". The non-alternative one: Croatians are from the area around Kraków (Poland), Serbs from the area around Bautzen-Zgorzelec (Germany-Poland) and no Sabirs from Azerbaijan are involved.

According some other ("alternative") theories, Siberia's name is indeed from Subartu - meaning the wast area "beyond" Subartu. Some other theories connect Sabirs with today's Hungarians, at least with the Megyer tribe and also with ancient land of Sumer.

Fact is, Siberia did not know a single Indo-Iranian speaking tribe till 16th Century, most tribes living there speaking agglutinative languages.

Ossetian, Albanian (here I mean Caucasian Albania), Serbian, Greek, Russian, Shquip, Celtic languages are all part of Indo-Iranian group. Agglutinative languages are Sumerian, Turkish, Mongolian, Hungarian, Finnish, Estonian, Korean, Azeri - but not Tadjik, which is an Iranian dialect or not Lithuanian (an other Indo-Iranian)

Some even say, the original Europeans did speak agglutinative tongue and Indo-Iranians have nothing to do with it, all of them are relatively newcomers: be them Ossets, Russians, Serbs, Shquips, Greeks, Celts, etc.

(You guessed correctly, such ideas are widespread in Turkey, Hungary, Estonia, Finland - but NOT in Greece, Ukraina, Lithuania, Albania)

bojan

pre 14 godina

it would be stupid for anyone to claim a such thing. however, i would like to point out one thing to you and all the Serbs outhere that no matter what you find or discover in Serbia that dates prior to 1300s you have no connection with it.
(spunky, 4 June 2009 08:34)

1300 minus additional 600 700 years...