Tadić: Law on Serbia's side

I am not a fan of Tadic's- HOWEVER, here he completely right! International LAW and not international PRESSURE is at stake here- not the greedy ambitions of a few. Imagine the future chaos of the entire world that would result if the ICJ rules in favor of Kosovo's UDI. Absolutely no country would be safe from having minorities within their borders claim that their "human rights" been "violated". The only safe countries would be those countries that would completely ban any other ethnic groups besides themselves- thereby creating "ethnically pure" states. Does "international law and order" want to see the creation of "ethnically pure" states- which would only lead to more and more intolerance towards mankind. The K-Albs have to realize that they are being "used" as pawns in a terrible international scheme. If it wasn't for the immense financial expense and position of Camp Bondsteel in the West's future "plan" for the world, the US would not "care" about the alleged human rights violations. I just hope that the ICJ judges use their independent judicial abilities to proclaim that international law and order should over-ride any country's (or group of countries) political ambitions or agendas. Truly, the future of the world and mankind will rest upon their decision.

Look who is sweating. If ti was a majority that wrote in favor of Serbia Tadic would have declared the case over and a victory for Serbia.

No matter what ICG decides, it won’t change anything in terrain, even thought it will speed up the recognition for Republic of Kosova. I am positive that before the decision we are going to have a seat in UN.


Tadic, please tell the truth to you on nation, before it gets to late. Remember, next elections in Serbia, your party will lose the election i bet you...

"Tadić: Law on Serbia's side"
This type of statements are antidemocratic and anti liberal.

It is the same as the one that say Allah is in my side.

Or only I know what is law and what is right or wrong.

If you add to that that in which side is the law is the courts that decide the understanding of the democracy in Serbia is in incubator yet.

If you add that you will recognize the courts decision ONLY if satisfies your requests is the greatest mockery of the international community. With that you will lose all your supporters.

Just as Greece that is not supporting you in ICJ or

Czechs with which all the time the Serbian people are bombed that hey will be the first to reverse the recognition of independence are actually backing Kosova's independence in ICJ.

First the honorary doctorate from Romania now 13 states submit for Serbia and one and all democracy giants. Kosova is done!

So, what's going to happen if ICJ rules in Serbia's favour?

Will the ruling be read out every year on June 28th in the Serbian parliament?

Will it maybe sit in a golden frame in the parliament?

Is there anyone who truly doesn't know that ICJ rulings are simply advisory opinions to the General Assembly and the General Assembly can only suggest motions to the Security Counsil.

Does anyone actually think that anything concrete can come out of this.

It might actually be funny if it weren't tragic.

However unfair the circumstances leading up to this moment, Serbia needs to forget about Kosovo and move on.

hachim thachi says that the ICJ ruling will be in favor of kosovo's independence...thats kinda funny just like the time he said 100 countries will recognize kosovo right after the declaration....or the time he said that kosovo is not a precedent for unrest but a unique case, and look what happened just a few months after kosovo declared independence...there was also the time he said that KLA didn't commit a single war crime...the people that tell that man what to say to the press are the ones that got involved in the kosovo problem in the first case..the americans! i am sure that the ICJ will rule in Serbia's favor

Bekim

Romania is a NATO and EU country, fully integrated into the Euro-Atlantic. Tell me, where is Kosovo then? Is Albania in the EU (OK, this month they joined NATO)? So who are you to call Romania undemocratic in any way?

According to Tadić, there should be no illusions as to the fact that political pressure will be exerted on the ICJ’s work, though the Serbian government is confident that the court will exhibit the highest possible level of impartiality.

Try to convince Moscow not excerte any political pressure on ICJ.And remember to say that ICJ was impartial even after they give its opinion.

“This isn’t just a Balkan question, or a Serbian question, this is a question for other continents too. There are many Kosovos, not just in the nearby Black Sea region, but many similar situations in Asia, in Africa, Latin America, and that’s why this question has a global significance,“

The other continents can solve their problems without Serbia's help.What you are doing here is blackmailing countries with low minority standards.Unfortunately some of them have fallen for it.But the truth is that is not the kosovo that is the precedent but Serbia.Every country with similar history to that of serbia abusive behavior towards kosovo albanians should fear Kosovo's independence. The question is how many Serbias are there in the world?

“In doing so, we’re not in any way impinging on the rights of Albanians or others. On the contrary, this kind of action at the ICJ protects the rights of Albanians too, not just the rights of Serbs and the state of Serbia in preserving its integrity and sovereignty,“ said the president.

So since you are not doing this to implinge the Albanians right to self determination and this kind of actions at ICJ protects the rights of Albanians too.Then why do you exclude accepting a ruling that will favor the Albanians?

"Imagine the future chaos of the entire world that would result if the ICJ rules in favor of Kosovo's UDI."

That is PURE scaremongering tactics which don't work anymore in the modern politics. Kosova is a sui generis case.

Ricki,

Of course you will object that no surprise here. Let the Court and look into the whole FACTS, historical, geographical, demographical etc etc. At the end of the day the Court's Opinion will be a lesson for all dictators in the world that if you opress your "own" people your risk losing these people and the territory where these people live in.

Peter, Romania is receiving a 4 billion donation from EU. I assure you there are many countries that thin even worse of Romania, like Italy for example. Everyone in EU is scratching their heads how on earth Romania wa allowed to join EU.

France, UK, Germany is origin of Law.
USA is superpower.
In Serbia's side are countries wellknown for copy and paste.
Tadic has no idea what is quality!!!

France, UK, Germany is origin of Law. 
USA is superpower. 
In Serbia's side are countries wellknown for copy and paste. 
Tadic has no idea what is quality!!!
(Dardania,, 23 April 2009 09:34)


Yes, of course the origin of law is in the UK of which there are three legal systems. One of those is Scots Law that has heavily influenced the modern development of law in common law systems like the US. Tort law has its origins in the Scots Law of delict (you know the snail in the bottle case). Western common law has influence the codified systems and, of course, International Law. In turn, Scots Law has its origins in Celtic and Roman Law amongst others. Celtic Law, I can assume, was influenced by Celtic tribes in Europe and in a settlement called Singidūnum. White City or Belgrade as it is known today.

It is therefore indisputable that international law has its origins in Belgrade. So, the law is on Serbia’s side. :p

Do I get the Ataman award for the most off the wall post today?

"that makes your statement partially correct"

Yeah! I'm happy with that. As for the time - it doesn't take long to post rubbish. Surely you know that? :p

There is no justice in this wretched world of ours, unfortunatelly. There is only one justice, which is explained by dictum: "Might is right". So, Albanians have won this battle (obtaining independence) but the war is not finished just yet. It will be a long long haul this one....

It is therefore indisputable that international law has its origins in Belgrade. So, the law is on Serbia’s side. :p

Do I get the Ataman award for the most off the wall post today?
(Robert Burns, 23 April 2009 15:08)

I am amazed that you find time to comment an extremely naive comment.

But I am even more amazed that in all your post you missed an essential thing: the first are of the first wave of great migration the second are of the second wave of great migration that makes your statement partially correct: yes Belgrade, no Serbia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migration_Period

That is as calling FYROMians (as Ataman refers to them) the descendents of Alexander the Great. Ridiculous!

Ataman who is the winner now?? ;)

Look who is sweating. If ti was a majority that wrote in favor of Serbia Tadic would have declared the case over and a victory for Serbia.

No matter what ICG decides, it won’t change anything in terrain, even thought it will speed up the recognition for Republic of Kosova. I am positive that before the decision we are going to have a seat in UN.


Tadic, please tell the truth to you on nation, before it gets to late. Remember, next elections in Serbia, your party will lose the election i bet you...

"Tadić: Law on Serbia's side"
This type of statements are antidemocratic and anti liberal.

It is the same as the one that say Allah is in my side.

Or only I know what is law and what is right or wrong.

If you add to that that in which side is the law is the courts that decide the understanding of the democracy in Serbia is in incubator yet.

If you add that you will recognize the courts decision ONLY if satisfies your requests is the greatest mockery of the international community. With that you will lose all your supporters.

Just as Greece that is not supporting you in ICJ or

Czechs with which all the time the Serbian people are bombed that hey will be the first to reverse the recognition of independence are actually backing Kosova's independence in ICJ.

First the honorary doctorate from Romania now 13 states submit for Serbia and one and all democracy giants. Kosova is done!

According to Tadić, there should be no illusions as to the fact that political pressure will be exerted on the ICJ’s work, though the Serbian government is confident that the court will exhibit the highest possible level of impartiality.

Try to convince Moscow not excerte any political pressure on ICJ.And remember to say that ICJ was impartial even after they give its opinion.

“This isn’t just a Balkan question, or a Serbian question, this is a question for other continents too. There are many Kosovos, not just in the nearby Black Sea region, but many similar situations in Asia, in Africa, Latin America, and that’s why this question has a global significance,“

The other continents can solve their problems without Serbia's help.What you are doing here is blackmailing countries with low minority standards.Unfortunately some of them have fallen for it.But the truth is that is not the kosovo that is the precedent but Serbia.Every country with similar history to that of serbia abusive behavior towards kosovo albanians should fear Kosovo's independence. The question is how many Serbias are there in the world?

“In doing so, we’re not in any way impinging on the rights of Albanians or others. On the contrary, this kind of action at the ICJ protects the rights of Albanians too, not just the rights of Serbs and the state of Serbia in preserving its integrity and sovereignty,“ said the president.

So since you are not doing this to implinge the Albanians right to self determination and this kind of actions at ICJ protects the rights of Albanians too.Then why do you exclude accepting a ruling that will favor the Albanians?

"Imagine the future chaos of the entire world that would result if the ICJ rules in favor of Kosovo's UDI."

That is PURE scaremongering tactics which don't work anymore in the modern politics. Kosova is a sui generis case.

Ricki,

Of course you will object that no surprise here. Let the Court and look into the whole FACTS, historical, geographical, demographical etc etc. At the end of the day the Court's Opinion will be a lesson for all dictators in the world that if you opress your "own" people your risk losing these people and the territory where these people live in.

So, what's going to happen if ICJ rules in Serbia's favour?

Will the ruling be read out every year on June 28th in the Serbian parliament?

Will it maybe sit in a golden frame in the parliament?

Is there anyone who truly doesn't know that ICJ rulings are simply advisory opinions to the General Assembly and the General Assembly can only suggest motions to the Security Counsil.

Does anyone actually think that anything concrete can come out of this.

It might actually be funny if it weren't tragic.

However unfair the circumstances leading up to this moment, Serbia needs to forget about Kosovo and move on.

hachim thachi says that the ICJ ruling will be in favor of kosovo's independence...thats kinda funny just like the time he said 100 countries will recognize kosovo right after the declaration....or the time he said that kosovo is not a precedent for unrest but a unique case, and look what happened just a few months after kosovo declared independence...there was also the time he said that KLA didn't commit a single war crime...the people that tell that man what to say to the press are the ones that got involved in the kosovo problem in the first case..the americans! i am sure that the ICJ will rule in Serbia's favor

France, UK, Germany is origin of Law.
USA is superpower.
In Serbia's side are countries wellknown for copy and paste.
Tadic has no idea what is quality!!!

Bekim

Romania is a NATO and EU country, fully integrated into the Euro-Atlantic. Tell me, where is Kosovo then? Is Albania in the EU (OK, this month they joined NATO)? So who are you to call Romania undemocratic in any way?

Peter, Romania is receiving a 4 billion donation from EU. I assure you there are many countries that thin even worse of Romania, like Italy for example. Everyone in EU is scratching their heads how on earth Romania wa allowed to join EU.

I am not a fan of Tadic's- HOWEVER, here he completely right! International LAW and not international PRESSURE is at stake here- not the greedy ambitions of a few. Imagine the future chaos of the entire world that would result if the ICJ rules in favor of Kosovo's UDI. Absolutely no country would be safe from having minorities within their borders claim that their "human rights" been "violated". The only safe countries would be those countries that would completely ban any other ethnic groups besides themselves- thereby creating "ethnically pure" states. Does "international law and order" want to see the creation of "ethnically pure" states- which would only lead to more and more intolerance towards mankind. The K-Albs have to realize that they are being "used" as pawns in a terrible international scheme. If it wasn't for the immense financial expense and position of Camp Bondsteel in the West's future "plan" for the world, the US would not "care" about the alleged human rights violations. I just hope that the ICJ judges use their independent judicial abilities to proclaim that international law and order should over-ride any country's (or group of countries) political ambitions or agendas. Truly, the future of the world and mankind will rest upon their decision.

It is therefore indisputable that international law has its origins in Belgrade. So, the law is on Serbia’s side. :p

Do I get the Ataman award for the most off the wall post today?
(Robert Burns, 23 April 2009 15:08)

I am amazed that you find time to comment an extremely naive comment.

But I am even more amazed that in all your post you missed an essential thing: the first are of the first wave of great migration the second are of the second wave of great migration that makes your statement partially correct: yes Belgrade, no Serbia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migration_Period

That is as calling FYROMians (as Ataman refers to them) the descendents of Alexander the Great. Ridiculous!

Ataman who is the winner now?? ;)

France, UK, Germany is origin of Law. 
USA is superpower. 
In Serbia's side are countries wellknown for copy and paste. 
Tadic has no idea what is quality!!!
(Dardania,, 23 April 2009 09:34)


Yes, of course the origin of law is in the UK of which there are three legal systems. One of those is Scots Law that has heavily influenced the modern development of law in common law systems like the US. Tort law has its origins in the Scots Law of delict (you know the snail in the bottle case). Western common law has influence the codified systems and, of course, International Law. In turn, Scots Law has its origins in Celtic and Roman Law amongst others. Celtic Law, I can assume, was influenced by Celtic tribes in Europe and in a settlement called Singidūnum. White City or Belgrade as it is known today.

It is therefore indisputable that international law has its origins in Belgrade. So, the law is on Serbia’s side. :p

Do I get the Ataman award for the most off the wall post today?

"that makes your statement partially correct"

Yeah! I'm happy with that. As for the time - it doesn't take long to post rubbish. Surely you know that? :p

There is no justice in this wretched world of ours, unfortunatelly. There is only one justice, which is explained by dictum: "Might is right". So, Albanians have won this battle (obtaining independence) but the war is not finished just yet. It will be a long long haul this one....