Serbs call for "two-way" returns

According to Milović, the attempted return of certain Albanian families to the village of Brđani in northern Kosovska Mitrovica at this time constitutes provocation that could destabilize the situation in the whole region.

Why would these K-Albanian families destabilze northern mitro if they moved to their own property. They never did any harm to its neighbors(Serbian) and to any Serb in Serbia proper. To me sounds like a very bad excuse with no carrot or a stick.

"They never did any harm to its neighbors(Serbian) and to any Serb in Serbia proper." -Rudolf Krasniqi

I don't mean to get your nose red, Rudolf, but are you suggesting that all those churches were burned down by the same people that attended mass? in case you need a list: http://emperors-clothes.com/list.htm

It's pretty obvious that more Albanians are returning to the north then there are Serbs returning to the south. Albanians in Norther Kosovo have nothing to fear unlike the Serbs who dear to move back to their own territory in the Albanian dominated south. How many Serb have actually returned to there homes in Pec and all the other places they were expelled from? The return of people should be in both directions or nothing at all!

'to return or not to return'
- UNMIK's role is not to enforce either.
If a family wants to return to their own home, no sane person(s) should attemt to prevent them from doing so.

Absolutely, everybody should return to their previous homes in entire Kosovo be it Serbs, Albaniens or any other people that were born or lived legally in Kosovo. You can't say it is ok for one to return but not for the other. In my mind, this would be considered two way return and justice for all.

I don't see any problem with people returning to their own properties.
However, I'm not familiar with the situation.
In Bosnia, where I'm from, at one point pressure was high on RS government to return properties to pre-war Muslim or Croat owners.
As evictions of Serb refugees started it became obvious that this should have been two-way effort. Families were evicted, in Banja Luka, for example, while their apartments of houses in Sarajevo, for example, were not returned, and still occupied by Muslim or Croat refugees. Soon, refugee centres were overflowing.
They are still overcrowded with refugees from Croatia who were evicted from Muslim and Croat properties in RS, while their own properties in Croatia was nationalised, and never returned, leaving them homeless.
Again, I'm not familiar with this case, but, if those properties are empty then they should be able to return without objection from anyone. But, if there are people living there, one has to look into their situation, too.
It could be more complicated then simple matter of returning the property to the rightfull owner.

On 7 April 2009 16:16, L wrote:

"Absolutely, everybody should return to their previous homes in entire Kosovo be it Serbs, Albaniens or any other people that were born or lived legally in Kosovo."

Sounds good - in theory. The problem is the word "legally". Legally according to what law? Legally according to which papers?

Considering all what has happened in the region, did everyone remember to take the papers and deeds that proved that they lived/owned a particular house/apartment, when they tried to escape.
--

That tells a lot what is all about. Serbia is interested only in return of displaced Serbs purely to use them BIG TIME!
(EA, 7 April 2009 23:13)

EA, read the article again. TWO WAY. What about two way don't you understand?
When Serbs are permitted to return to their homes without incident then Albanians should as well. Do you think it's fair that Albanian families go back to their property but Serbs are not allowed?

Two way EA. Serbia is not suggesting only Serbs return. Show me the sentence where this is said. Unless you can take a sentence out of this report that supports you view don't write utter rubbish.

"...the attempted return of certain Albanian families to the village of Brđani in northern Kosovska Mitrovica at this time constitutes provocation that could destabilize the situation in the whole region.

That tells a lot what is all about. Serbia is interested only in return of displaced Serbs purely to use them BIG TIME!

EA, thank you for making this crystal clear.
I see that there is only one way, YOUR WAY, according to you.

Sorry to disappoint you. Who says that your way is legal or even just? Don't shove your way down everyone's throat.

Peggy,

To make my point clearer to you.

Everyone should BE ALLOWED without any hindrance to RETURN to they properties despite the fact of being a Serb or Albanian. FULL stop! There are now two ways or three ways. There is on way. Welcome to everyone in the new democratic and independent Kosova.

"They never did any harm to its neighbors(Serbian) and to any Serb in Serbia proper." -Rudolf Krasniqi

I don't mean to get your nose red, Rudolf, but are you suggesting that all those churches were burned down by the same people that attended mass? in case you need a list: http://emperors-clothes.com/list.htm

It's pretty obvious that more Albanians are returning to the north then there are Serbs returning to the south. Albanians in Norther Kosovo have nothing to fear unlike the Serbs who dear to move back to their own territory in the Albanian dominated south. How many Serb have actually returned to there homes in Pec and all the other places they were expelled from? The return of people should be in both directions or nothing at all!

According to Milović, the attempted return of certain Albanian families to the village of Brđani in northern Kosovska Mitrovica at this time constitutes provocation that could destabilize the situation in the whole region.

Why would these K-Albanian families destabilze northern mitro if they moved to their own property. They never did any harm to its neighbors(Serbian) and to any Serb in Serbia proper. To me sounds like a very bad excuse with no carrot or a stick.

"...the attempted return of certain Albanian families to the village of Brđani in northern Kosovska Mitrovica at this time constitutes provocation that could destabilize the situation in the whole region.

That tells a lot what is all about. Serbia is interested only in return of displaced Serbs purely to use them BIG TIME!

'to return or not to return'
- UNMIK's role is not to enforce either.
If a family wants to return to their own home, no sane person(s) should attemt to prevent them from doing so.

That tells a lot what is all about. Serbia is interested only in return of displaced Serbs purely to use them BIG TIME!
(EA, 7 April 2009 23:13)

EA, read the article again. TWO WAY. What about two way don't you understand?
When Serbs are permitted to return to their homes without incident then Albanians should as well. Do you think it's fair that Albanian families go back to their property but Serbs are not allowed?

Two way EA. Serbia is not suggesting only Serbs return. Show me the sentence where this is said. Unless you can take a sentence out of this report that supports you view don't write utter rubbish.

Peggy,

To make my point clearer to you.

Everyone should BE ALLOWED without any hindrance to RETURN to they properties despite the fact of being a Serb or Albanian. FULL stop! There are now two ways or three ways. There is on way. Welcome to everyone in the new democratic and independent Kosova.

On 7 April 2009 16:16, L wrote:

"Absolutely, everybody should return to their previous homes in entire Kosovo be it Serbs, Albaniens or any other people that were born or lived legally in Kosovo."

Sounds good - in theory. The problem is the word "legally". Legally according to what law? Legally according to which papers?

Considering all what has happened in the region, did everyone remember to take the papers and deeds that proved that they lived/owned a particular house/apartment, when they tried to escape.
--

Absolutely, everybody should return to their previous homes in entire Kosovo be it Serbs, Albaniens or any other people that were born or lived legally in Kosovo. You can't say it is ok for one to return but not for the other. In my mind, this would be considered two way return and justice for all.

I don't see any problem with people returning to their own properties.
However, I'm not familiar with the situation.
In Bosnia, where I'm from, at one point pressure was high on RS government to return properties to pre-war Muslim or Croat owners.
As evictions of Serb refugees started it became obvious that this should have been two-way effort. Families were evicted, in Banja Luka, for example, while their apartments of houses in Sarajevo, for example, were not returned, and still occupied by Muslim or Croat refugees. Soon, refugee centres were overflowing.
They are still overcrowded with refugees from Croatia who were evicted from Muslim and Croat properties in RS, while their own properties in Croatia was nationalised, and never returned, leaving them homeless.
Again, I'm not familiar with this case, but, if those properties are empty then they should be able to return without objection from anyone. But, if there are people living there, one has to look into their situation, too.
It could be more complicated then simple matter of returning the property to the rightfull owner.

EA, thank you for making this crystal clear.
I see that there is only one way, YOUR WAY, according to you.

Sorry to disappoint you. Who says that your way is legal or even just? Don't shove your way down everyone's throat.