Tadić denounces Dodik "witch hunt"

@ the previous post, I'm not sute what good that would do Tadic to bash Dodik. That's kind of like Clinton bashing blair. So please explain your post? Do you know any politcian who mentions bad things about people who are on his side?

The Serbian presidency shouldn’t meddle in the affairs of the sovereign Bosnian state — independent of Belgrade since 1992.

I don't remember Mr. Tadic speaking out against the witch-hunt against the LGBT community, human rights defenders or NGOs who have critical attitudes towards Serbia' recent past.
(George Blunt, 27 February 2009 14:16)

thanks, george, an obvious point to me, rather wasted on our opponents.

there is something very deeply troubling here, below the surface. serbia does not support the integrity of bosnia -- serbia did everything in its power to destroy that integrity, and now supports the integrity of RS which, with its ultra-corrupt leadership (and i admit that's not a problem w RS alone)regularly threatens to destroy bosnia's integrity, one way or the other.

if you read the nationalists here (how can you not?!) you see that yes, they would be perfectly happy with that. they "lost" kosovo/a, so they should "get" a big piece of bosnia as a consolation prize.
fortunately the intl community will never permit it.

I don't remember Mr. Tadic speaking out against the witch-hunt against the LGBT community, human rights defenders or NGOs who have critical attitudes towards Serbia' recent past.

I don't remember Mr. Tadic speaking out against the witch-hunt against the LGBT community, human rights defenders or NGOs who have critical attitudes towards Serbia' recent past.

I don't remember Mr. Tadic speaking out against the witch-hunt against the LGBT community, human rights defenders or NGOs who have critical attitudes towards Serbia' recent past.
(George Blunt, 27 February 2009 14:16)

thanks, george, an obvious point to me, rather wasted on our opponents.

there is something very deeply troubling here, below the surface. serbia does not support the integrity of bosnia -- serbia did everything in its power to destroy that integrity, and now supports the integrity of RS which, with its ultra-corrupt leadership (and i admit that's not a problem w RS alone)regularly threatens to destroy bosnia's integrity, one way or the other.

if you read the nationalists here (how can you not?!) you see that yes, they would be perfectly happy with that. they "lost" kosovo/a, so they should "get" a big piece of bosnia as a consolation prize.
fortunately the intl community will never permit it.

The Serbian presidency shouldn’t meddle in the affairs of the sovereign Bosnian state — independent of Belgrade since 1992.

@ the previous post, I'm not sute what good that would do Tadic to bash Dodik. That's kind of like Clinton bashing blair. So please explain your post? Do you know any politcian who mentions bad things about people who are on his side?