peter, sydney
pre 15 godina
It's a Done Deal:
US legal eagle supports US position. Go figure. As for future negotiations, that will depend on the ICJ's ruling in the medium term, & if outcome is positive for Serbia, then will depend on K-albanians appetite for limbo in the long term. Also, your key no longer fit's the lock.
Funcakes:
You are confusing ICTY with ICJ. Shame isn't it.
bmrusila:
Share your cynicism w.r.t. Tadic. Less so regarding Jeremic. Regardless, still think ICJ is a good idea.
And than what Mr Jeremic,where from there.???
(Viti i Balit, 11 October 2008 13:45)
Wait for K-albanians to get fed up with current status quo.
AC:
Will cross that bridge or not, if it comes. Just as was the case with the vote in the GA. And Serbia is well on it's way with dealing with it's past. K-albanians on the other hand have barely begun.
qylym:
Serbia's initiative is on it's way to the ICJ, with no modifications. That is good enough for now. As for the effects of Montengro's recognition, for a start, that story is not over, & in any event, is only really significant for locals.
Jonathon:
Once again, ICJ is not the ICTY. And for an issue of this significance, will more than likely be the entire bench. As regards this statement:
"Not one decision of the ICJ has been truly independent and anti US as it is (apparently) funded by US and pro US"
It is simply wrong. Have cited US vs Nicaragua before. In that decision, only judge that supported the US position was.. US judge.
14 Komentari
Sortiraj po: