peter, sydney
pre 15 godina
dan-ch:
> ----> didn't Costa Rica say they would support Serbia?
> yes costa rica is known as a big serbian supporter in recognizing kosovo 1 day after > declaration of independence
> ---> Aren't they one of your '47'?
> yes
> ---> And if Costa Rica would, why not some of the others?
> none of them will support your ICJ remember me words
'Remember me words'? Try eating them.
http://www.innercitypress.com/icj1serbia090508.html
Why would Costa Rica do so given that they recognised 'pseudo-state'? I suspect they didn't like having their 'arm twisted' by the 'good ole US'.
I also suspect there will be other states in that '47' that feel likewise.
As for your list of 20 islamic countries, I count 19.
And what source can you provide that these will not support ICJ? Unfortunately, going by your track record, your 'word' doesn't quite cut it.
I said:
> That's the 1st 5 of your 27 'NO's. Could be No. Could also be Yes.
you said:
> you are in all of the 5 wrong
Let's have another look shall we.
Montenegro:
Djukanovic in an attempt to mollify his electorate is seemingly predicting recognition on the outcome of the GA vote & if necessary, on the outcome before the ICJ should the GA pass Serbia's bid.
That by itself is enough to polarise just about all of the serbs & a majority of the montenegrins against him should Serbia's bid before the GA fail. If he goes further & instructs his ambassador not to vote for the proposal, he can say 'goodbye' to government come the next election.
Macedonia:
Has a significant militant albanian minority which may very well succeed in forcing recognition. But by voting for Serbia's proposal, not only will Gruevski mollify Serbia's anger, he will also be advancing his own country's interests - no doubt secretly hoping that Serbia succeeds before the ICJ & thereby strengthen's international law against seccessionists, which will in turn make his country less vulnerable to a break-up - despite being forced to recognise.
Bosnia:
May very well abstain, but then faces the prospect of RS seceding in retaliation should Serbia's bid before the GA fail.
You in turn state that Bosnia has 'made it clear that they will not support your ICJ'. What is your source?
New Zealand:
Here you're really grasping at straws. New Zealand, unlike Australia, has stated that in will not recognise. In addition, they are not dependent on the US for defence & large enough not to be bullied. And they also have their own problems with the maoris.
You said:
> new zealand never voted against US and great britain in the history of United Nations
And once again your source is?
In reality New Zealand & the US have been at loggerheads many times - the most serious being the suspension of their participation in the ANZUS alliance back in 86.
Ukraine:
you said:
> ukraine has a pro-western gouvernment and they will never vote against US and europe they want to be part of nato
Then why haven't they recognised your 'puppet-state'? With the Crimea mostly etnic russians & the recent fracas in Georgia, they are now less likely, not more likely, to recognise Kosovo & it is overwhelmingly in their interests to see Serbia's bid succeed.
I said before:
> That's the 1st 5 of your 27 'NO's. Could be No. Could also be Yes.
And I am in fact not wrong in saying this.
Was trying to be reasonable before, but unfortunately their was nothing reasonable in your reply.
Which makes it obvious that attempting to even try to do so, is pointless.
5 Komentari
Sortiraj po: