Niall O'Doherty
pre 15 godina
The Kosovo case is more similar, for example, with the case of East Timor, though both are not the same.
(Bad Gorilla, 30 August 2008 13:36)
Wrong Bad Gorilla.
You are contradicting yourself with that statement. The cases of Kosmet and Timor-Leste are in fact completely dissimilar if anything. The Autonomous Province of Kosmet is an integral part of the Republic of Serbia and is recognised as such under International Law. The UDI of Pristina is only partially recognised and is illegal due to Belgrade's insistence that it is part of Serbia. The only way you guys can ever have your legal status resolved is by entering into a bilateral agreement with Belgrade, i.e. they recognise you. That my friend isnt going to happen so get ready for many decades of isolation and poverty.
Timor-Leste on the otherhand was ruled directly by Lisbon up to 6 December 1975 when Indonesian army invaded under the tacit approval of Australia and the US. Timor-Leste & Portuguese Governor Mario-Soares Lemes had been in the process of negotiations to de-colonise the territory after the Marxist FRETLIN Party declared independence from Portugal on 28 November 1975. When Indonesia invaded, the Portuguese fled thereby stalling the talks between Fretlin and Lisbon which resulted in the Indonesian occupation being declared illegal as Portuguese had not finished finalising the handing over power to the democratically elected government in Dili.
Therefore Indonesia's occupation was not recognised and until April 2002, Timor-Leste was recognised by the UN as Portuguese Timor until the issue was finally resolved and under agreement between Jakarta, UN and Lisbon, Timor-Leste became independent.
Now spot the difference. Timor-Leste is legal. You're not.
21 Komentari
Sortiraj po: