5

Saturday, 09.08.2008.

11:24

"London thwarted Karadžić arrest"

James Luko, a former UN official in Bosnia-Hercegovina, says the UK government prevented Radovan Karadžić’s arrest in 1997.

Izvor: Brendan Simms

"London thwarted Karadžiæ arrest" IMAGE SOURCE
IMAGE DESCRIPTION

5 Komentari

Sortiraj po:

Mospyt

pre 15 godina

Hang on a minute. Before jumping on a British bashing bandwagon ask yourselves, 'Why didn't the RS police arrest Karadzic?' Why is it always some else's fault? Think people before you write!

Balkan Boy

pre 15 godina

Both the British and US KFOR were not even interested in securing the burning and looting that happened in Bosnia and Kosovo, since they were told "soldiers do not do police work." Same rationale during the 2004 March riots in Kosovo, KFOR were told to secure the monks and Serbs, but not property or centuries old churches. I am sure the British soldiers were asked to stand down, because they were afraid of any deadly retaliation against their soldiers and they did not want to risk their soldiers and public opinion in Britain.

Lunger, the British did not go to war over Poland. They only declared war with Germany, but did not deploy any troops anywhere. Only when Hitler took over France, did the British intervene. They betrayed Poland, they crushed the polish government in exile in London. The Polish PM in exile died in a plane crash over Britain, when he objected to the Yalta conference details. Many British politician denounced Churchill for betraying Poland even during the Warsaw Uprising in 1944. They sympathised with Poles but did not lift a finger.

Lenard

pre 15 godina

Lunger: Only in words not deeds. When 90% of the German army was in the east invading Poland. The British and French didn't make one single move. They said the 10% of the Germans army was behaving them selfs in the western sector. Only fighting started in the west when Germany invaded France other then that they could not care or be bothered about the Slavs. Only when them selfs and their survival were in danger & did bother. If they went on the offensive while Germany was invading Poland the 10% of their weakest Germans divisions would of been wiped out and Nazi Germany defeated in no time. The world would not have suffered 10s of millions murders and destruction on a unrepresented scale and 6years of bloody war. I'm afraid the Slavs are buying the same old nonsense of London ,Berlin ,Rome ,Paris of EU and NATO. They just found a buffer in the east they will not be fighting in the western country's and on their borders but in the Slavic nations and their borders first. People never learn do they its easier to believe in lies then look reality in the face.

Lunger

pre 15 godina

Yes Lenard. So observant of you. British people only want to use Slavs...because they allowed Hitler to take the Czechs to avoid war?
Wait. You forgot something.
The British went to war over Poland. Polish SLAVS.
Get over your Anglo-Saxon prejudice and your xenophobic slavic pride if you want anyone to take you seriously.

Lenard

pre 15 godina

The British government were always biasedly pro Serb for their own political games. Until Kosovo conflict happened to get Islam support in Iraq. These are the same that sold out the Czechs to Hitler and didn't help the Poles when Germany invated. When they promised signed a mutual defense treaty no need to say more about the British governments only Slavs to be used.

Lenard

pre 15 godina

The British government were always biasedly pro Serb for their own political games. Until Kosovo conflict happened to get Islam support in Iraq. These are the same that sold out the Czechs to Hitler and didn't help the Poles when Germany invated. When they promised signed a mutual defense treaty no need to say more about the British governments only Slavs to be used.

Lenard

pre 15 godina

Lunger: Only in words not deeds. When 90% of the German army was in the east invading Poland. The British and French didn't make one single move. They said the 10% of the Germans army was behaving them selfs in the western sector. Only fighting started in the west when Germany invaded France other then that they could not care or be bothered about the Slavs. Only when them selfs and their survival were in danger & did bother. If they went on the offensive while Germany was invading Poland the 10% of their weakest Germans divisions would of been wiped out and Nazi Germany defeated in no time. The world would not have suffered 10s of millions murders and destruction on a unrepresented scale and 6years of bloody war. I'm afraid the Slavs are buying the same old nonsense of London ,Berlin ,Rome ,Paris of EU and NATO. They just found a buffer in the east they will not be fighting in the western country's and on their borders but in the Slavic nations and their borders first. People never learn do they its easier to believe in lies then look reality in the face.

Balkan Boy

pre 15 godina

Both the British and US KFOR were not even interested in securing the burning and looting that happened in Bosnia and Kosovo, since they were told "soldiers do not do police work." Same rationale during the 2004 March riots in Kosovo, KFOR were told to secure the monks and Serbs, but not property or centuries old churches. I am sure the British soldiers were asked to stand down, because they were afraid of any deadly retaliation against their soldiers and they did not want to risk their soldiers and public opinion in Britain.

Lunger, the British did not go to war over Poland. They only declared war with Germany, but did not deploy any troops anywhere. Only when Hitler took over France, did the British intervene. They betrayed Poland, they crushed the polish government in exile in London. The Polish PM in exile died in a plane crash over Britain, when he objected to the Yalta conference details. Many British politician denounced Churchill for betraying Poland even during the Warsaw Uprising in 1944. They sympathised with Poles but did not lift a finger.

Lunger

pre 15 godina

Yes Lenard. So observant of you. British people only want to use Slavs...because they allowed Hitler to take the Czechs to avoid war?
Wait. You forgot something.
The British went to war over Poland. Polish SLAVS.
Get over your Anglo-Saxon prejudice and your xenophobic slavic pride if you want anyone to take you seriously.

Mospyt

pre 15 godina

Hang on a minute. Before jumping on a British bashing bandwagon ask yourselves, 'Why didn't the RS police arrest Karadzic?' Why is it always some else's fault? Think people before you write!

Lenard

pre 15 godina

The British government were always biasedly pro Serb for their own political games. Until Kosovo conflict happened to get Islam support in Iraq. These are the same that sold out the Czechs to Hitler and didn't help the Poles when Germany invated. When they promised signed a mutual defense treaty no need to say more about the British governments only Slavs to be used.

Lunger

pre 15 godina

Yes Lenard. So observant of you. British people only want to use Slavs...because they allowed Hitler to take the Czechs to avoid war?
Wait. You forgot something.
The British went to war over Poland. Polish SLAVS.
Get over your Anglo-Saxon prejudice and your xenophobic slavic pride if you want anyone to take you seriously.

Lenard

pre 15 godina

Lunger: Only in words not deeds. When 90% of the German army was in the east invading Poland. The British and French didn't make one single move. They said the 10% of the Germans army was behaving them selfs in the western sector. Only fighting started in the west when Germany invaded France other then that they could not care or be bothered about the Slavs. Only when them selfs and their survival were in danger & did bother. If they went on the offensive while Germany was invading Poland the 10% of their weakest Germans divisions would of been wiped out and Nazi Germany defeated in no time. The world would not have suffered 10s of millions murders and destruction on a unrepresented scale and 6years of bloody war. I'm afraid the Slavs are buying the same old nonsense of London ,Berlin ,Rome ,Paris of EU and NATO. They just found a buffer in the east they will not be fighting in the western country's and on their borders but in the Slavic nations and their borders first. People never learn do they its easier to believe in lies then look reality in the face.

Balkan Boy

pre 15 godina

Both the British and US KFOR were not even interested in securing the burning and looting that happened in Bosnia and Kosovo, since they were told "soldiers do not do police work." Same rationale during the 2004 March riots in Kosovo, KFOR were told to secure the monks and Serbs, but not property or centuries old churches. I am sure the British soldiers were asked to stand down, because they were afraid of any deadly retaliation against their soldiers and they did not want to risk their soldiers and public opinion in Britain.

Lunger, the British did not go to war over Poland. They only declared war with Germany, but did not deploy any troops anywhere. Only when Hitler took over France, did the British intervene. They betrayed Poland, they crushed the polish government in exile in London. The Polish PM in exile died in a plane crash over Britain, when he objected to the Yalta conference details. Many British politician denounced Churchill for betraying Poland even during the Warsaw Uprising in 1944. They sympathised with Poles but did not lift a finger.

Mospyt

pre 15 godina

Hang on a minute. Before jumping on a British bashing bandwagon ask yourselves, 'Why didn't the RS police arrest Karadzic?' Why is it always some else's fault? Think people before you write!