Matthew
pre 15 godina
Gorilla,
The Military Frontier lasted for hundreds of years and was not under the jurisdiction of Croatia. Hardly temporary or an “integral part” of Croatia. If we employ such logic, then we could say Vojvodina and Kosovo got autonomy simply to support Tito’s “weak Serbia, strong Yugoslavia” policy. With the end of Yugoslavia, this policy had no further use.
Tito may have been a Yugoslav Communist, but he was not blind to ethnicity and his policies were designed to stifle democracy and lower the influence of Serbians in Yugoslavia where they made up the majority. Simply the fact that he did not make Krajina autonomous but did so for Vojvodina proves this beyond a doubt.
“Jasenovac does not justify Vukovar, nor Srebrenica.” No it does not, but you’re just using “sound bytes” to avoid actually addressing my point which has NOTHING to do with Vukovar or Srebrenica. What it does justify is the right of the Serbian population to defend itself against the rehabilitation of the Ustashe and their return. Had a moderate and not a crazy nationalist like Tudjman come to power, you’d have a valid argument, but I’ve read Tudjman’s books and I know better.
“there was no possibility of the resurgence of Nazi-puppet Croatia or concentration camps, even under Tudjman.”
http://www.b92.net/eng/news/region-article.php?yyyy=2008&mm=08&dd=05&nav_id=52470
Read the article from yesterday, yes there were camps at the start of the war in 1992 where thousands of innocent civilians and children were killed. Read the old articles from the Economist magazine from the beginning of the war, and you’ll see Croatia is credited with starting the ethnic cleansing at that time.
You under-estimate the effect the Croatian flag, the currency and the return and open welcome of former members of the Ustashe to the Croatian government. The renaming of streets after Ustashe members, not to mention the books Tudjman wrote. In addition the purging of Serbians from their jobs and forcing people to declare their ethnicity.
Whether or not it was actually Tudjman’s intent to murder the remaining Serbs is up to debate, but what is absolutely clear is he engaged in psychological warfare designed to put the fear of death into the Serbian population.
If there was no possibility of a resurgence of the Ustashe, why did so many paramilitary groups use that name, why is Krajina filled with Ustashe graffiti all over the destroyed homes and Churches, even to this day. I’ve been there and seen it with my own eyes, I know better. So why does it look like that even to this day?
“The right of self-determination in the case of Yugoslavia did not applied to the religious or ethnic groups, but to the former Socialist Yugoslav Republics and eventually Tito-era autonomous provinces.”
I could understand if it were just the former Republics, but when you add Tito’s artificial creations to the mix, then you have to ask yourself if other areas that should have received autonomy were left out because of Tito’s “weak Serbia” policy.
To blame everything on Belgrade propaganda is pretty intellectually lazy and expresses a strong lack of understanding of the complexities of Balkan politics.
The reality is, even the UN commission decided Croatia did not respect minority rights enough to merit independence at the time, but Germany went ahead and pushed it through without thinking of the long term affects it might have.
A go slow approach might very well have avoided a lot of this mess.
28 Komentari
Sortiraj po: