Ataman
pre 15 godina
village-bey,
Glad, you are back, long not seen! (Bowing)
I agree so far, that given positive IJC verdict, Serbia should carefully look for the "victim". For sure, any EU country would be a bad target. The major ones - obviously. The minor ones because Serbia either does/should not alienate itself with them or because of special relationship (Hungary, Slovenia, etc). Suing Hungary could be useful short-term and most likely they (Serb) would score big against us, but it would back-fire because of relationship going from "somewhat-friendly" to sour. Suing Kosovo directly is indeed a bizarre act of self-spanking.
You forgot, there are few countries on the list who have no historic connection with Serbia and could be rather receiving Serbian or even Kosovar aid than aiding Kosovo/Serbia. They are an easy target and only one lawsuit is necessary. Not sure, the fact Serbia suing Burkina Faso would affect the relationship with Germany directly. But Serbia winning against Burkina Faso will give her more room to deal with EU and USA.
As far as Kosovo being good cathalyst - sorry, you are wrong, just the opposite. Serbia became trapped in that Kosovo with autistic government fighting itself for years, rather than taking care of progress. A minor party with strong fascist flavor - THANKS TO KOSOVO! - got some nationalist than later populist facelift, poisoned a good part of Serbia, became the second-largest in the country and even helped similar forces inside of Russia to become more loud. Thanks, but no thanks for that. Like the "humanitarian bombing" did not bring down Miloshevic, it rather conserved his power for some more years. Before it begun he was almost a dead man. But thanks to that, he not just got some more time for his unholy politics, some politically dead Russians like Zhirinovskij begun to run all over Serbia like spider on the wall escorted by Nikolic and promising "wonder weapons".
Without all this insanity (in good part sparked from outside!), Jugoslavija was firmly on European path in 70-s and 80-s. The fact: Jugoslavija was to big for EU to digest in one part. They needed it to be cut in few. They hoped, that the process will be less painful, but unfortunately there crazy Serbs had "inat" and most were firmly "federalists".
ROBERT-0 (from-Frisco):
1) The grammatics. There is no "government of Kosova" even for most vehement Kosovo-Albanians. They argue, there is "Republika e Kosovës". "Kosova" is the Albanian pronouncing of "Kosovo", which in turn is a "lazy" way Serbs call the area. The full name is "Kosovo Polje" = "Field of Blackbirds", where "Kos" is "Blackbird" in many Slavonic languages. So "Kos" = "blackbird", "Kosovo" = "of blackbirds".
I think, "Village-Bey" would confirm this. Unless you want to poke Serbs into eye try not to be more Catholic than Pope. And if you do... than don't complain on New Kosova Report forum, you are not popular on B92. Or do you really seek popularity?
Here is their forum - with interesting comments... I like yours "the truth is i had hardly even heard of Kosovo until 1999 (just very peripherally)" and further "we are in the process of writing a book about these events".
http://tinyurl.com/656rkq
Interesting, you write "Kosovo" on Albanian forum - but "Kosova" on Serbian? And after so much "experience" you already ready to write a book? You know... I have Serbian and Albanian friends. We will team up to write a book, too. We need some money, too. :(
2) You write:
"the main question is how it would work for a now-sovereign country (kosova) to sue for war-crimes committed by a sovereign country (serbia) about (Tragic) events that occurred while kosova was technically a part of serbia. actually kosovo/a was a part of yugoslavia, and claimed by serbia -- several historians have made this case so it might be possible to go in that direction. i will discuss it with human rights activists and various officials in kosova in the coming weeks."
The best would be if everyone would clean-up their act and jail who did commit war crimes. There were criminals on all levels on all sides. In the theory the court called "Hague Tribunal" is responsible for the war crimes committed on the territory of Jugoslavija,
http://tinyurl.com/5dn4wf
This is a pure theory because that tribunal has huge ethical issues - see again on the Wiki (please don't claim, Wiki is infested by Serbs!) The rest of your writing does not make much sense, sorry. You mention "counter lawsuit" - but Serbia does not intent to sue Kosovo. They had perfectly legal procedure against some Kosovo-leaders. What would be the court the "now-sovereign country" would sue Serbia? What is the opinion of the human rights activists you mention about crimes against Serbs? About crimes against Gorani? Do you know, what "Gorani" does mean and who they are?
Are you going to fly to Pristina in coming weeks to meet "officials in kosova"? Who is financing your trip?
BTW: I am, too, planing a visit to Kosovo/va. I am financing my trip (luckily, I am now much closer geographically!), I do not plan to meet any officials. I am 100% sure, neither side is interested to meet me, neither I am interested to meet them. I plan to donate some of my older technical stuff to Serbian and Albanian schools there. I barely have any money, but at least I am not making up to be "important", neither have I goal to be popular on B92 or "New Kosova Report".
Maybe you too, should go there and donate rather than bounce between B92 and New Kosova Report, threaten Serbs to be sued by some Sith Lord Court of some Galactic Empire and complain on New Kosova Report about lack of popularity... :-/
28 Komentari
Sortiraj po: