2

Sunday, 27.07.2008.

12:37

Russia questions Hague objectivity

The former Russian ambassador to Serbia says Russia is uncertain whether Radovan Karadžić’s Hague trial will be objective.

Izvor: Vesna Biga

Russia questions Hague objectivity IMAGE SOURCE
IMAGE DESCRIPTION

2 Komentari

Sortiraj po:

Ataman

pre 15 godina

http://tinyurl.com/5dn4wf

"...Tribunal aims to complete all trials by the end of 2009 and all appeals by 2010"

I am curious, what future it has in August 2008.

Whoever has any question about the court itself - straight from horse's mouth:

"NATO countries are those that have provided the finance to set up the Tribunal, we are amongst the majority financiers, and of course to build a second chamber so that prosecutions can be speeded up so let me assure that we and the Tribunal are all one on this, we want to see war criminals brought to justice and I am certain that when Justice Arbour goes to Kosovo and looks at the facts she will be indicting people of Yugoslav nationality and I don't anticipate any others at this stage."

(NATO spokesman, Jamie Shea)

Again:

"when Justice Arbour goes to Kosovo and looks at the facts she will be indicting people of Yugoslav nationality and I don't anticipate any others at this stage."

1) What an idiot to admit!
2) "Yugoslav nationality"... I feel, Serbs would be much better off today, would they play a "Serb SEPARATIST" card, not "Yugoslav Federalist" card earlier. The agenda was IMO to help break-up the country (Yugoslavia) for economic and political reason and prevent the creation of bigger entities.

Anyway, Serbia agreed with that nonsense - so they have to swallow the pill and cooperate. It was OK until there was no sign of justice in former YU. In 2008 this "court" became merely a tool of political blackmail. In 2008 the only place it should be responsible for is precisely Kosovo - a province in limbo, with too many masters and no real country at the same time. But it's where the court failed.

Ataman

pre 15 godina

http://tinyurl.com/5dn4wf

"...Tribunal aims to complete all trials by the end of 2009 and all appeals by 2010"

I am curious, what future it has in August 2008.

Whoever has any question about the court itself - straight from horse's mouth:

"NATO countries are those that have provided the finance to set up the Tribunal, we are amongst the majority financiers, and of course to build a second chamber so that prosecutions can be speeded up so let me assure that we and the Tribunal are all one on this, we want to see war criminals brought to justice and I am certain that when Justice Arbour goes to Kosovo and looks at the facts she will be indicting people of Yugoslav nationality and I don't anticipate any others at this stage."

(NATO spokesman, Jamie Shea)

Again:

"when Justice Arbour goes to Kosovo and looks at the facts she will be indicting people of Yugoslav nationality and I don't anticipate any others at this stage."

1) What an idiot to admit!
2) "Yugoslav nationality"... I feel, Serbs would be much better off today, would they play a "Serb SEPARATIST" card, not "Yugoslav Federalist" card earlier. The agenda was IMO to help break-up the country (Yugoslavia) for economic and political reason and prevent the creation of bigger entities.

Anyway, Serbia agreed with that nonsense - so they have to swallow the pill and cooperate. It was OK until there was no sign of justice in former YU. In 2008 this "court" became merely a tool of political blackmail. In 2008 the only place it should be responsible for is precisely Kosovo - a province in limbo, with too many masters and no real country at the same time. But it's where the court failed.

Ataman

pre 15 godina

http://tinyurl.com/5dn4wf

"...Tribunal aims to complete all trials by the end of 2009 and all appeals by 2010"

I am curious, what future it has in August 2008.

Whoever has any question about the court itself - straight from horse's mouth:

"NATO countries are those that have provided the finance to set up the Tribunal, we are amongst the majority financiers, and of course to build a second chamber so that prosecutions can be speeded up so let me assure that we and the Tribunal are all one on this, we want to see war criminals brought to justice and I am certain that when Justice Arbour goes to Kosovo and looks at the facts she will be indicting people of Yugoslav nationality and I don't anticipate any others at this stage."

(NATO spokesman, Jamie Shea)

Again:

"when Justice Arbour goes to Kosovo and looks at the facts she will be indicting people of Yugoslav nationality and I don't anticipate any others at this stage."

1) What an idiot to admit!
2) "Yugoslav nationality"... I feel, Serbs would be much better off today, would they play a "Serb SEPARATIST" card, not "Yugoslav Federalist" card earlier. The agenda was IMO to help break-up the country (Yugoslavia) for economic and political reason and prevent the creation of bigger entities.

Anyway, Serbia agreed with that nonsense - so they have to swallow the pill and cooperate. It was OK until there was no sign of justice in former YU. In 2008 this "court" became merely a tool of political blackmail. In 2008 the only place it should be responsible for is precisely Kosovo - a province in limbo, with too many masters and no real country at the same time. But it's where the court failed.