This is just another proof that Serbian dictator Slobodan Milosevic was the main mastermind behind the creation of Republika Srspka Krajina in Croatia and Republika Srpska in Bosnia.
What a perfect 3-way union: "Communist" (!?) milosevic, "anti-communist" nutcase sesejl, and self-admitted mass murder mastermind Karadzic. it was definitely not A union made in heaven, but somewhere far-away from that, in the other direction.
The ICTY in its desperation will accept anything as evidence, whether hearsay or supposedly intercepted calls - intercepted by a passive party to the the war in Bosnia, i.e. NATO.
British UNPROFOR officers in Sarajevo wrote that the US intelligence experts were intercepting and passing on intelligence to Izetbegovic's ArBiH, no doubt the same people who provided this evidence.
Considering the US' ability to fabricate techincal evidence (which that have done in the past) and their partisan involvement in Bosnia, these 'intercepts' would have no legal standing in any normal democratic legal system and would be dismissed as evidence. But then again, this is the ICTY, a special 'one off' case, so special that the International Criminal Court is not based on it at all.
It seems that the ICTY serves the purpose similar to the famous british 'red top' tabloids, publish and accuse anything regardless of merit or authenticity, the difference being that the ICTY is supposed to be a criminal tribunal.
US officials will not testify at the ICTY without official government 'minders' and are only allowed to be asked specific questions that they are forewarned in advance (for example the Gotovina case). I cannot imagine any other 'democratic' country willing to subject themselves to this level of judicial corruption. It seems like the ICTY's institutional racism is ok for foreigners, but not for those outside the region.
The ICTY in its desperation will accept anything as evidence, whether hearsay or supposedly intercepted calls - intercepted by a passive party to the the war in Bosnia, i.e. NATO.
British UNPROFOR officers in Sarajevo wrote that the US intelligence experts were intercepting and passing on intelligence to Izetbegovic's ArBiH, no doubt the same people who provided this evidence.
Considering the US' ability to fabricate techincal evidence (which that have done in the past) and their partisan involvement in Bosnia, these 'intercepts' would have no legal standing in any normal democratic legal system and would be dismissed as evidence. But then again, this is the ICTY, a special 'one off' case, so special that the International Criminal Court is not based on it at all.
It seems that the ICTY serves the purpose similar to the famous british 'red top' tabloids, publish and accuse anything regardless of merit or authenticity, the difference being that the ICTY is supposed to be a criminal tribunal.
US officials will not testify at the ICTY without official government 'minders' and are only allowed to be asked specific questions that they are forewarned in advance (for example the Gotovina case). I cannot imagine any other 'democratic' country willing to subject themselves to this level of judicial corruption. It seems like the ICTY's institutional racism is ok for foreigners, but not for those outside the region.
This is just another proof that Serbian dictator Slobodan Milosevic was the main mastermind behind the creation of Republika Srspka Krajina in Croatia and Republika Srpska in Bosnia.
What a perfect 3-way union: "Communist" (!?) milosevic, "anti-communist" nutcase sesejl, and self-admitted mass murder mastermind Karadzic. it was definitely not A union made in heaven, but somewhere far-away from that, in the other direction.
What a perfect 3-way union: "Communist" (!?) milosevic, "anti-communist" nutcase sesejl, and self-admitted mass murder mastermind Karadzic. it was definitely not A union made in heaven, but somewhere far-away from that, in the other direction.
This is just another proof that Serbian dictator Slobodan Milosevic was the main mastermind behind the creation of Republika Srspka Krajina in Croatia and Republika Srpska in Bosnia.
The ICTY in its desperation will accept anything as evidence, whether hearsay or supposedly intercepted calls - intercepted by a passive party to the the war in Bosnia, i.e. NATO.
British UNPROFOR officers in Sarajevo wrote that the US intelligence experts were intercepting and passing on intelligence to Izetbegovic's ArBiH, no doubt the same people who provided this evidence.
Considering the US' ability to fabricate techincal evidence (which that have done in the past) and their partisan involvement in Bosnia, these 'intercepts' would have no legal standing in any normal democratic legal system and would be dismissed as evidence. But then again, this is the ICTY, a special 'one off' case, so special that the International Criminal Court is not based on it at all.
It seems that the ICTY serves the purpose similar to the famous british 'red top' tabloids, publish and accuse anything regardless of merit or authenticity, the difference being that the ICTY is supposed to be a criminal tribunal.
US officials will not testify at the ICTY without official government 'minders' and are only allowed to be asked specific questions that they are forewarned in advance (for example the Gotovina case). I cannot imagine any other 'democratic' country willing to subject themselves to this level of judicial corruption. It seems like the ICTY's institutional racism is ok for foreigners, but not for those outside the region.
IMAGE SOURCE
4 Komentari
Sortiraj po: