Behari, I know the answer is so what. I wasn't complaining about them not being multiethnic, but merely correcting the LIE that they would be.
They shouldn't lie about such things as everyone knows the truth.
1. Serbia isn;t trusted by the West (Russia's buddy)
Why is it then that NATO and the EU is so supportive of Boris Tadic and integration of Serbia in EU and NATO? EU membership for Serbia is estimated for 2015, NATO membership for even earlier.
2. Albania had a pipeline and corridor 8
Albania is only considered for NATO for purposes of stability in the Balkans, not because they are in anyway useful to NATO. NATO is a military organization and Albania does not even have an army, so why should they be accepted if not for stability purposes only?
3. From Kosova NATO can move troops faster to Middle east
Why would NATO need Kosovo to be closer to the Middle East when it has members Greece and Turkey to use?
You appear to be 'worrying' too much about Kosovars being sent to Afghanistan for training.
(PRN, 15 July 2008 16:04)
--
Me worried? Nah... It's just payment to your masters for having Afghanistan as the first to recognise Kosovo. There will be many many more payments due so treat it as normal.
And these Kosovo forces will be multi-ethnic. Really?
Who besides the Albanians will be in it? They have expelled everyone except Albanians from most of Kosovo and the Serbs don't want any part of this farce.
Albanians from Kosovo and Albanians from Albanian is the new multi-ethnic force.
NATO has trained and supported the KLA before so nothing new here.
NATO should be on the terrorist list as well now. They are one and the same. Partners in crime.
I'm quite certain that, just as they did when supplying the stinger missiles to the proto-talibans in the 80's and 90's, they will have a repayment in spades.
NATO needs to be in the region:
1. Serbia isn;t trusted by the West (Russia's buddy)
2. Albania had a pipeline and corridor 8
3. From Kosova NATO can move troops faster to Middle east
Congrats to Kosova's new security and let's start with a 15,000 strong army.
No surprises here. NATO is the occupying force after all. Even though it is going beyond its mandate, I would expect a few Albanians to get some basic training on the front lines of Afghanistan.
No surprises here. NATO is the occupying force after all. Even though it is going beyond its mandate, I would expect a few Albanians to get some basic training on the front lines of Afghanistan.
NATO needs to be in the region:
1. Serbia isn;t trusted by the West (Russia's buddy)
2. Albania had a pipeline and corridor 8
3. From Kosova NATO can move troops faster to Middle east
Congrats to Kosova's new security and let's start with a 15,000 strong army.
And these Kosovo forces will be multi-ethnic. Really?
Who besides the Albanians will be in it? They have expelled everyone except Albanians from most of Kosovo and the Serbs don't want any part of this farce.
Albanians from Kosovo and Albanians from Albanian is the new multi-ethnic force.
NATO has trained and supported the KLA before so nothing new here.
NATO should be on the terrorist list as well now. They are one and the same. Partners in crime.
You appear to be 'worrying' too much about Kosovars being sent to Afghanistan for training.
(PRN, 15 July 2008 16:04)
--
Me worried? Nah... It's just payment to your masters for having Afghanistan as the first to recognise Kosovo. There will be many many more payments due so treat it as normal.
I'm quite certain that, just as they did when supplying the stinger missiles to the proto-talibans in the 80's and 90's, they will have a repayment in spades.
1. Serbia isn;t trusted by the West (Russia's buddy)
Why is it then that NATO and the EU is so supportive of Boris Tadic and integration of Serbia in EU and NATO? EU membership for Serbia is estimated for 2015, NATO membership for even earlier.
2. Albania had a pipeline and corridor 8
Albania is only considered for NATO for purposes of stability in the Balkans, not because they are in anyway useful to NATO. NATO is a military organization and Albania does not even have an army, so why should they be accepted if not for stability purposes only?
3. From Kosova NATO can move troops faster to Middle east
Why would NATO need Kosovo to be closer to the Middle East when it has members Greece and Turkey to use?
Behari, I know the answer is so what. I wasn't complaining about them not being multiethnic, but merely correcting the LIE that they would be.
They shouldn't lie about such things as everyone knows the truth.
NATO needs to be in the region:
1. Serbia isn;t trusted by the West (Russia's buddy)
2. Albania had a pipeline and corridor 8
3. From Kosova NATO can move troops faster to Middle east
Congrats to Kosova's new security and let's start with a 15,000 strong army.
No surprises here. NATO is the occupying force after all. Even though it is going beyond its mandate, I would expect a few Albanians to get some basic training on the front lines of Afghanistan.
I'm quite certain that, just as they did when supplying the stinger missiles to the proto-talibans in the 80's and 90's, they will have a repayment in spades.
And these Kosovo forces will be multi-ethnic. Really?
Who besides the Albanians will be in it? They have expelled everyone except Albanians from most of Kosovo and the Serbs don't want any part of this farce.
Albanians from Kosovo and Albanians from Albanian is the new multi-ethnic force.
NATO has trained and supported the KLA before so nothing new here.
NATO should be on the terrorist list as well now. They are one and the same. Partners in crime.
You appear to be 'worrying' too much about Kosovars being sent to Afghanistan for training.
(PRN, 15 July 2008 16:04)
--
Me worried? Nah... It's just payment to your masters for having Afghanistan as the first to recognise Kosovo. There will be many many more payments due so treat it as normal.
1. Serbia isn;t trusted by the West (Russia's buddy)
Why is it then that NATO and the EU is so supportive of Boris Tadic and integration of Serbia in EU and NATO? EU membership for Serbia is estimated for 2015, NATO membership for even earlier.
2. Albania had a pipeline and corridor 8
Albania is only considered for NATO for purposes of stability in the Balkans, not because they are in anyway useful to NATO. NATO is a military organization and Albania does not even have an army, so why should they be accepted if not for stability purposes only?
3. From Kosova NATO can move troops faster to Middle east
Why would NATO need Kosovo to be closer to the Middle East when it has members Greece and Turkey to use?
Behari, I know the answer is so what. I wasn't complaining about them not being multiethnic, but merely correcting the LIE that they would be.
They shouldn't lie about such things as everyone knows the truth.
IMAGE SOURCE
17 Komentari
Sortiraj po: