Dinkić wants more money for NIS

oh, sweet fiat. i like that 'deal'. i like beads and i like mirrors, so i have no choice except to like that 'deal'.
also if i may suggest a different headline, how bout, 'dinkic wants more money', period.

Wow, it has taken the new government less than a week to start breaking campaign promises - they want to novate a contracts with the Russians for more money but they are still unwilling to novate the SAA for the sake of Kosovo.

Like always and before, the BGANON coalition is more concerned with Money than Kosovo's Serbs.

I am begining to understand the Kosovo Albanians; i would not want to be represented by the DS/SPS government either

Marko, G17 have always supported making LUKOIL pay more for NIS, so no campaign promises broken there.

And as for my coalition, if only they were mine they would be far more effective. As it is we will have to make do with the current least worst option.

Its funny how all you guys were so close and lovey dovey with SPS until they jilted you. Now its all 'we never wanted them' 'they have no principles' (as if they ever had principles) etc...

As I said once upon a time and will continue to say - SPS should reform and neither Mira Markovic or Marko Milosevic are above the law. If this government lets them off the hook it will be a huge negative in my opinion.

On the issue, was NIS sold too cheaply? I think so. The Serbian government should have a majority share in NIS as a compromise. That means LUKOIL should part with 2% of the company. If they won't do it, then lets see how much they want NIS - at a public auction with a level playing field.

Bagnon,

as you are well aware Dinkic didn't make the promise, his boss Mr. Tadic did.

on May 6 b92 reported:
Boris Tadić's Democrats (DS) reacted yesterday by saying that this time, after three refusals to support the move, their ministers in the caretaker cabinet were ready to vote in favor of sending the strategic energy agreement, signed in Moscow on Jan. 25, to parliament for ratification.

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2008&mm=05&dd=06&nav_id=49996

on May 7 B92 reported

“During the election silence, the government will be able to calmly decide about the energy agreement and the SAA. We didn’t want to propose the SAA for adoption to prevent it from being abused by the dissolved parliament. After the elections, the new parliament will have full legitimacy to ratify both agreements,” said the president.

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2008&mm=05&dd=07&nav_id=50042

You know that Tadic told the people that both agreements would be ratified- ratification is not novation or renegotiation.

This article and discussion has nothing to do with the SPS
but as you brought them up-

Your nonsense of me being lovey dovey with the Socialists is just that; nonsense.
I strongly suggest you brought the socialists up as either a diversion to the issue- Mr. Tadic's broken promise or perhaps you brought them up because it saddens you that they are in power.

Let me ask you a question about the SPS with respect to Kosovo- Should the prospects for negotiations change how do you expect the K albanians to negotiate with a government consisting of the SPS?
I assure you that they would probably perfer negotiating with the Radicals because at least the Radicals do not hide or mask their animosity towards Kosovo Albanian Nationalists.

Kosovo Albanians won't have to negotiate with SPS. The Kosovo Ministry is headed by DS. Do you think that anybody is stupid enough to send in an SPS 'negotiator' to deal with the Kosovo issue?

The NIS deal can be re-negotiated and still ratified. Why not? I don't understand why you are representing the Russian interest above the Serbian interest?

BTW a statement from Dinkic is hardly a broken promise from Tadic is it?

I think you need to calm down, the Russians are quite capable of negotiating without your support.

Marko, G17 have always supported making LUKOIL pay more for NIS, so no campaign promises broken there.

And as for my coalition, if only they were mine they would be far more effective. As it is we will have to make do with the current least worst option.

Its funny how all you guys were so close and lovey dovey with SPS until they jilted you. Now its all 'we never wanted them' 'they have no principles' (as if they ever had principles) etc...

As I said once upon a time and will continue to say - SPS should reform and neither Mira Markovic or Marko Milosevic are above the law. If this government lets them off the hook it will be a huge negative in my opinion.

On the issue, was NIS sold too cheaply? I think so. The Serbian government should have a majority share in NIS as a compromise. That means LUKOIL should part with 2% of the company. If they won't do it, then lets see how much they want NIS - at a public auction with a level playing field.

Wow, it has taken the new government less than a week to start breaking campaign promises - they want to novate a contracts with the Russians for more money but they are still unwilling to novate the SAA for the sake of Kosovo.

Like always and before, the BGANON coalition is more concerned with Money than Kosovo's Serbs.

I am begining to understand the Kosovo Albanians; i would not want to be represented by the DS/SPS government either

oh, sweet fiat. i like that 'deal'. i like beads and i like mirrors, so i have no choice except to like that 'deal'.
also if i may suggest a different headline, how bout, 'dinkic wants more money', period.

Bagnon,

as you are well aware Dinkic didn't make the promise, his boss Mr. Tadic did.

on May 6 b92 reported:
Boris Tadić's Democrats (DS) reacted yesterday by saying that this time, after three refusals to support the move, their ministers in the caretaker cabinet were ready to vote in favor of sending the strategic energy agreement, signed in Moscow on Jan. 25, to parliament for ratification.

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2008&mm=05&dd=06&nav_id=49996

on May 7 B92 reported

“During the election silence, the government will be able to calmly decide about the energy agreement and the SAA. We didn’t want to propose the SAA for adoption to prevent it from being abused by the dissolved parliament. After the elections, the new parliament will have full legitimacy to ratify both agreements,” said the president.

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2008&mm=05&dd=07&nav_id=50042

You know that Tadic told the people that both agreements would be ratified- ratification is not novation or renegotiation.

This article and discussion has nothing to do with the SPS
but as you brought them up-

Your nonsense of me being lovey dovey with the Socialists is just that; nonsense.
I strongly suggest you brought the socialists up as either a diversion to the issue- Mr. Tadic's broken promise or perhaps you brought them up because it saddens you that they are in power.

Let me ask you a question about the SPS with respect to Kosovo- Should the prospects for negotiations change how do you expect the K albanians to negotiate with a government consisting of the SPS?
I assure you that they would probably perfer negotiating with the Radicals because at least the Radicals do not hide or mask their animosity towards Kosovo Albanian Nationalists.

Kosovo Albanians won't have to negotiate with SPS. The Kosovo Ministry is headed by DS. Do you think that anybody is stupid enough to send in an SPS 'negotiator' to deal with the Kosovo issue?

The NIS deal can be re-negotiated and still ratified. Why not? I don't understand why you are representing the Russian interest above the Serbian interest?

BTW a statement from Dinkic is hardly a broken promise from Tadic is it?

I think you need to calm down, the Russians are quite capable of negotiating without your support.