nik
pre 15 godina
Dear Peggy,
Until the Congress of Berlin Serbia was an autonomous entity within the Ottoman Empire. If the "law" was to be exercised, Serbs still wouldn't be independent.
But soveregnity is not like ownership. Or may be it used to be when monarchs actually owned the poeple concerned.
Well people are no longer subjects to their sovereng.
Australia is about to become a republic and the queen will have no option but to accept the will of the people.
You present it as if it was cutting bleeding flesh from Serbia's body! That was maybe the cas when Serbia aquired Kosovo (and other territories), not now. Why is it so hard to understand that Serbia's soveregnity over Kosovo was a formality, emptied of any sense for a long, long time.
Serbia may obstruct the normalization of Kosovo, and use the abnormal sytuation there as a case against its recognition, hoping that that in turn will keep the situiation abnormal. But that will inevitably infect Serbia with all the Kosovo's deseas: orginized crime etc.
When you have a gangrane, you need an operation, called amputation. Only a brief amputation of Kosovo will keep the Presevo valley and Sandzak same and will prevent the gangrane to spread to other more remote parts of Serbia's body.
34 Komentari
Sortiraj po: