Đinđić widow, govt. condemn Šešelj comments

To think that we could have this clown who condones murder as the hidden leader of this country.

Its shameful that DSS are even entertaining the idea of sharing power with Seselj. Its also shameful that nobody in SRS has the courage to condemn Seselj's statement as I know that there are some reasonable SRS members.

Crveni Vuk Seselj volunteered to go to the Hague - Djindjic didn't send him there. And what has that got to do with Seselj comparing the murderer of Djindjic to Princip anway?

"For the last five years, we've insisted that it was a political assassination and a political crime"

So what, Seseljs' trial is political too, don't forget that your husband sent him there

once again Seselj, still the leader of the Radical party of Serbia (SRS), has thrown dirt on his motherland. his comment about the assassination of Mr. Zoran Dincic says everything about the moral disintegration of Seselj.

It's time that that radicals distance themselves from their leader, otherwise it's clear they haven't changed one bit and that the country is better off not having a goverment that includes the SRS.

you know what is really sad -- it takes an outsider, an american, to see it, though everyone in serbia older than 12 knows just how crazy and dangerous that man is, and yet 1/3 of the citizens "democratically" vote for him, pardon the expression.

as for djindjic's widow, my heart goes out to her, and one day i hope that we can meet her and say so, in person. her husband was a pragmatic and decent man, and didn't deserve the fate that awaits such people in democratic serbia.

and one more fun little memory about seselj, while we're dishing the dirt, merrily traveling down memory lane -- am i imagining things or was it seselj, less than 1 month! before the assassination, who suddenly gave himself up to the hague, crying: "blood will flow!" coincidence? well, i don't really think so.

excuse me, but why does b-92 just publish all of these comments, interesting or inane, without pushing for a real investigation into the political background of djindjic's murder? even if all of the other war crimes go unaccounted for, and people's consciences are off on permanent hiatus, you'd think there would be a little interest in the assassination of your own leader!

roberto of frisco

1) If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck - it is a duck.

2) If it walks like a fascist and quacks like a fascist - it is a.... what?

Dear oh dear, Natasa Jovanovic. Seselj - the defender of international law?? It would be comical if it weren't so sad. The amount of self-delusion in the ranks of the Radicals. It's starting to look like double-think and Nineteen Eighty-Four.

I would like more background from B92. In what context did Seselj say these remarks at the ICTY?

This is important because the next question is why he said them. Did he just get swept up in the discussion or was he aware of the impact it would have in Serbia? In the latter case the question would be what his intentions were: Is he afraid that the party may give up too much in the coalition talks and that he (Seselj) may become an outsider? Does he want to sabotage the coalition talks?

To think that we could have this clown who condones murder as the hidden leader of this country.

Its shameful that DSS are even entertaining the idea of sharing power with Seselj. Its also shameful that nobody in SRS has the courage to condemn Seselj's statement as I know that there are some reasonable SRS members.

Crveni Vuk Seselj volunteered to go to the Hague - Djindjic didn't send him there. And what has that got to do with Seselj comparing the murderer of Djindjic to Princip anway?

"For the last five years, we've insisted that it was a political assassination and a political crime"

So what, Seseljs' trial is political too, don't forget that your husband sent him there

It's time that that radicals distance themselves from their leader, otherwise it's clear they haven't changed one bit and that the country is better off not having a goverment that includes the SRS.

once again Seselj, still the leader of the Radical party of Serbia (SRS), has thrown dirt on his motherland. his comment about the assassination of Mr. Zoran Dincic says everything about the moral disintegration of Seselj.

you know what is really sad -- it takes an outsider, an american, to see it, though everyone in serbia older than 12 knows just how crazy and dangerous that man is, and yet 1/3 of the citizens "democratically" vote for him, pardon the expression.

as for djindjic's widow, my heart goes out to her, and one day i hope that we can meet her and say so, in person. her husband was a pragmatic and decent man, and didn't deserve the fate that awaits such people in democratic serbia.

and one more fun little memory about seselj, while we're dishing the dirt, merrily traveling down memory lane -- am i imagining things or was it seselj, less than 1 month! before the assassination, who suddenly gave himself up to the hague, crying: "blood will flow!" coincidence? well, i don't really think so.

excuse me, but why does b-92 just publish all of these comments, interesting or inane, without pushing for a real investigation into the political background of djindjic's murder? even if all of the other war crimes go unaccounted for, and people's consciences are off on permanent hiatus, you'd think there would be a little interest in the assassination of your own leader!

roberto of frisco

1) If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck - it is a duck.

2) If it walks like a fascist and quacks like a fascist - it is a.... what?

Dear oh dear, Natasa Jovanovic. Seselj - the defender of international law?? It would be comical if it weren't so sad. The amount of self-delusion in the ranks of the Radicals. It's starting to look like double-think and Nineteen Eighty-Four.

I would like more background from B92. In what context did Seselj say these remarks at the ICTY?

This is important because the next question is why he said them. Did he just get swept up in the discussion or was he aware of the impact it would have in Serbia? In the latter case the question would be what his intentions were: Is he afraid that the party may give up too much in the coalition talks and that he (Seselj) may become an outsider? Does he want to sabotage the coalition talks?