peter, sydney
pre 16 godina
Stuart & Alexander James:
Or perhaps I should say Stuart & his echo as the latter didn't actually add anything new.
Equally amusing is that you made no actual attempt to answer those criticisms - just tried to evade the issue by using misdirection.
Is she a brave person? Probably. Although I would suggest that the people trying to carry on with life in the isolated enclaves in Kosovo are far braver - would be far safer to leave, but they choose to stay & they don't get any sort of recognition.
And while we're talking about heroes, lets not forget the likes of Oric, Haradinaj & Thaci.
But on to the topic at hand. Pray tell me..
Why has this woman not condemned NATO for the civilian deaths in the bombing campaign?
Why does the "Helsinki Committee for Human Rights" in Serbia consistently overestimate the death toll in places like Bosnia during the 1990's?
Why does it underestimate the death toll from the civilian bombings?
Why hasn't it's parent group the 'Human Rights Watch" condemned the US for it's rendition program & the use of torture techniques such as 'water-boarding'?
Why does 'Human Rights Watch' consistently underestimate the death toll of civilians in Iraq?
And why has she come out in support of UNMIK when the evidence indicates that UNMIK deliberately tried to proke a riot?
Answer please.
Ben:
"Do you think that Biserko and the one that organize Mitrovica rebellion by throwing hand grenades to UN are the same? "
More of the same old sloppy propaganda ben? Cannot really answer this question because it makes assumptions that are not valid.
Firstly, what rebellion?
How can the serbs in Kosovska Mitrovica be rebelling when they have never joined your so called 'republic of Kosovo'?
And it is not they who are the instigators of the riot of the 17th.. It is the UNMIK high command in Pristina.. which I might add is not the same as the UN.
And while I'am asking them, here are some questions for you regarding UNMIK's mission to arrest those protestors on the 17th - you know.. the one that caused the riot in Kosovska Mitrovica.
The responsible thing for UNMIK to do in these situations is negotiate first & when all avenues of negotiation are exhausted, only then do you consider the use of force.
Was that the case?
Wasn't Samardžic due to visit Kosovska Mitrovica that very day?
Couldn't he have persuaded the protesters to leave, & in doing so, have earned himself some free political 'brownie points'?
I personally don't care who gets the credit, as long as the situation get's resolved peacefully.
The point is, we will never know as he never even got the chance to try.
Why not?
The mission was executed on the aniversary of the 2004 riots.
What 'responsible' person would pick the aniversary date, given that there was no particular urgency to get those people out of the court-house - could easily have waited a day or so - didn't do so.
Why not?
UNMIK's local chief in Kosovska Mitrovica, Gerard Galluci was against this mission & advised his superiors against it predicting that it would lead to violence. After 'the dust settled', he resigned 'in protest'.
As chief for the local area, his knowledge of the local situation was far superior to theirs, & yet his advice was ignored.
Why didn't the UNMIK heads in Pristina listen to him?
This is what Galluci had to say in his report to the UN:
"The report says that the raid was a "badly planned operation to restore law and order in the north, which has led to the disappearance of law and order".
"The choice of the date – March 17 – the fourth anniversary of the last episode of the ethnic cleansing of the Kosovo Serbs, and the decision to arrest and transport the Serbs to Priština looks as if it was created in order to inflame the Serb feelings," Galluci adds. "
I personally think it is a damning indictment of the UNMIK leadership in Pristina.
Do you?
The UNMIK soldier who died was a Ukrainian. One would expect that the Ukrainians would blame the person who killed him for his death. They didn't.
Instead the Ukrainians blamed UNMIK's planners - it seems that they too agree with Galluci.
Why did the Ukrainians blame the UNMIK leadership in Pristina for the death of their soldier?
Why did Carl Bildt, former UN special envoy to the balkans criticise UNMIK's mission?
Why have some many 'posts' on this website called into question the 'wisdom' of UNMIK's mission basically agreeing that riots were the predictable result?
And before you argue that they are all K-serb supporters, think again. Some of them were from the pro K-albanian camp.
So why?
waiting...
25 Komentari
Sortiraj po: