Doni, A name is a matter of FACT not wishful thinking. My point is (and I obviously have to spell it out to you) is that you cannot change facts. If you are writing in Albanian and there is an Albanian name for Kosovo then I can understand the distortion.
The matter of status is pending so we can debate that. I am also not trying to sway B92 to back a side at all. I am reminding B92 of their own regulations which are, that no inflamatory material will be published.
Now since Kosovo is written as Kosova by the Albanian camp only to irritate and disrespect the sovereign country to which it belongs, naturally a normal question to ask would be Why?
Again, I was not expecting an answer from B92. The reason for my objection being published is enough. I fully understand that B92 does not get involved in debating anything with their readers but only reply when there is a problem with a site or similar.
I like your sense of humor (comment #1). I also like the name of that other guy, called Jugoslav. Do you know anything about him?
It would be interesting to see a Jugoslav as head of Serbia.
even we albanians have always refered to serbia as serbia.
but kosova or kosovo is another matter, you can relate it with the status issue,
they dont agree about the status and here we dont agree about the name.
so you keep calling it kosovo and we kosova. simple as that.
and B92 has its own voice to speak about, and doesnt need to be represented by me.
if i was b92.. hehe =)
why they dont reply to you is because they dont want to be involved in this childish issue and after you will be accusing them of helping albanians spread their propaganda.
why you want so much to know what B92 thinks on the matter?
I think you want to make b92 to take openly sides.
I hope b92 has already given you the answer here, but lets see.
Doni, please read my comment again. I gave an example of how Albanians refer to KosovO as KosovA. There was no mistake. I did not say I agreed with the wrong spelling only that the spelling was factually inaccurate which is something that B92 says will affect their decision when posting articles.
Also it is not a matter of respect at all. It is your side who doesn't show any respect towards a sovereign Country. You don't see any Serbian and other non Albanian posters refering to Albania as anything else but Albania.
Now how about I started refering to Albanians as Albinos or similar? That would certainly be inaccurate disrespectful and inflamatory. Please show respect if you want respect shown to you.
Bye the way I was asking B92 the question and I don't think you represent them. Do you?
in your comment you just refered to Kosovo as Kosova.
but you didn't notice it, and it wasn't inflamatory to you.
I think B92 is respecting both sides. and you should understand that if you want to discuss you have to accept and respect the other side. And Kosova Kosovo Kosove KiM is not a big deal here.
What about Dardania? If you still find it inflamatory, I think you have a bad temper.
When I click on article about Croat Mesic remarks about Kosovo totally unrelated article about Ilic appears. I would actually like to see more remarks about Mesic's article-why did it diappeared?
Very interesting article from Mr Mesic who seems to know history of Serbia but not the history of his own country of Croatia.
B92 If you are indeed sincere about not publishing factual errors of inflamatory remarks then you certainly would not publish anything written by anyone refereing to Kosovo as Kosova.
This is both factually wrong and inflamatory.
Any reason why you let those comment through or don't censor them?
We are happy to post our readers' comments, but strongly believe the best idea is to leave out insults, hate speech, gross factual errors, offensive exaggeration, and the like.
Comments published on all B92's websites are moderated. Our readers who do not wish to have their opinion edited in any way can indicate so, and if the content, in its entirety, is not acceptable by our standards, we will honor their wish and will not publish the comment in question at all.
Our posters who send comments under different nicknames, where they praise or argue with their own previous posts, will also have noticed that such posts will not be allowed. We invite them to desist from this.
We also invite our readers to refrain from trolling and similar practices, and point out that posts whose sole goal is to provoke the perceived other side, will not be published.
We also take this opportunity to thank a number of our readers who regularly post insightful and analytical comments which we believe contribute to our website greatly.
Doni, please read my comment again. I gave an example of how Albanians refer to KosovO as KosovA. There was no mistake. I did not say I agreed with the wrong spelling only that the spelling was factually inaccurate which is something that B92 says will affect their decision when posting articles.
Also it is not a matter of respect at all. It is your side who doesn't show any respect towards a sovereign Country. You don't see any Serbian and other non Albanian posters refering to Albania as anything else but Albania.
Now how about I started refering to Albanians as Albinos or similar? That would certainly be inaccurate disrespectful and inflamatory. Please show respect if you want respect shown to you.
Bye the way I was asking B92 the question and I don't think you represent them. Do you?
B92 If you are indeed sincere about not publishing factual errors of inflamatory remarks then you certainly would not publish anything written by anyone refereing to Kosovo as Kosova.
This is both factually wrong and inflamatory.
Any reason why you let those comment through or don't censor them?
When I click on article about Croat Mesic remarks about Kosovo totally unrelated article about Ilic appears. I would actually like to see more remarks about Mesic's article-why did it diappeared?
Very interesting article from Mr Mesic who seems to know history of Serbia but not the history of his own country of Croatia.
in your comment you just refered to Kosovo as Kosova.
but you didn't notice it, and it wasn't inflamatory to you.
I think B92 is respecting both sides. and you should understand that if you want to discuss you have to accept and respect the other side. And Kosova Kosovo Kosove KiM is not a big deal here.
What about Dardania? If you still find it inflamatory, I think you have a bad temper.
We are happy to post our readers' comments, but strongly believe the best idea is to leave out insults, hate speech, gross factual errors, offensive exaggeration, and the like.
Comments published on all B92's websites are moderated. Our readers who do not wish to have their opinion edited in any way can indicate so, and if the content, in its entirety, is not acceptable by our standards, we will honor their wish and will not publish the comment in question at all.
Our posters who send comments under different nicknames, where they praise or argue with their own previous posts, will also have noticed that such posts will not be allowed. We invite them to desist from this.
We also invite our readers to refrain from trolling and similar practices, and point out that posts whose sole goal is to provoke the perceived other side, will not be published.
We also take this opportunity to thank a number of our readers who regularly post insightful and analytical comments which we believe contribute to our website greatly.
even we albanians have always refered to serbia as serbia.
but kosova or kosovo is another matter, you can relate it with the status issue,
they dont agree about the status and here we dont agree about the name.
so you keep calling it kosovo and we kosova. simple as that.
and B92 has its own voice to speak about, and doesnt need to be represented by me.
if i was b92.. hehe =)
why they dont reply to you is because they dont want to be involved in this childish issue and after you will be accusing them of helping albanians spread their propaganda.
why you want so much to know what B92 thinks on the matter?
I think you want to make b92 to take openly sides.
I hope b92 has already given you the answer here, but lets see.
I like your sense of humor (comment #1). I also like the name of that other guy, called Jugoslav. Do you know anything about him?
It would be interesting to see a Jugoslav as head of Serbia.
Doni, A name is a matter of FACT not wishful thinking. My point is (and I obviously have to spell it out to you) is that you cannot change facts. If you are writing in Albanian and there is an Albanian name for Kosovo then I can understand the distortion.
The matter of status is pending so we can debate that. I am also not trying to sway B92 to back a side at all. I am reminding B92 of their own regulations which are, that no inflamatory material will be published.
Now since Kosovo is written as Kosova by the Albanian camp only to irritate and disrespect the sovereign country to which it belongs, naturally a normal question to ask would be Why?
Again, I was not expecting an answer from B92. The reason for my objection being published is enough. I fully understand that B92 does not get involved in debating anything with their readers but only reply when there is a problem with a site or similar.
We are happy to post our readers' comments, but strongly believe the best idea is to leave out insults, hate speech, gross factual errors, offensive exaggeration, and the like.
Comments published on all B92's websites are moderated. Our readers who do not wish to have their opinion edited in any way can indicate so, and if the content, in its entirety, is not acceptable by our standards, we will honor their wish and will not publish the comment in question at all.
Our posters who send comments under different nicknames, where they praise or argue with their own previous posts, will also have noticed that such posts will not be allowed. We invite them to desist from this.
We also invite our readers to refrain from trolling and similar practices, and point out that posts whose sole goal is to provoke the perceived other side, will not be published.
We also take this opportunity to thank a number of our readers who regularly post insightful and analytical comments which we believe contribute to our website greatly.
in your comment you just refered to Kosovo as Kosova.
but you didn't notice it, and it wasn't inflamatory to you.
I think B92 is respecting both sides. and you should understand that if you want to discuss you have to accept and respect the other side. And Kosova Kosovo Kosove KiM is not a big deal here.
What about Dardania? If you still find it inflamatory, I think you have a bad temper.
B92 If you are indeed sincere about not publishing factual errors of inflamatory remarks then you certainly would not publish anything written by anyone refereing to Kosovo as Kosova.
This is both factually wrong and inflamatory.
Any reason why you let those comment through or don't censor them?
Doni, please read my comment again. I gave an example of how Albanians refer to KosovO as KosovA. There was no mistake. I did not say I agreed with the wrong spelling only that the spelling was factually inaccurate which is something that B92 says will affect their decision when posting articles.
Also it is not a matter of respect at all. It is your side who doesn't show any respect towards a sovereign Country. You don't see any Serbian and other non Albanian posters refering to Albania as anything else but Albania.
Now how about I started refering to Albanians as Albinos or similar? That would certainly be inaccurate disrespectful and inflamatory. Please show respect if you want respect shown to you.
Bye the way I was asking B92 the question and I don't think you represent them. Do you?
even we albanians have always refered to serbia as serbia.
but kosova or kosovo is another matter, you can relate it with the status issue,
they dont agree about the status and here we dont agree about the name.
so you keep calling it kosovo and we kosova. simple as that.
and B92 has its own voice to speak about, and doesnt need to be represented by me.
if i was b92.. hehe =)
why they dont reply to you is because they dont want to be involved in this childish issue and after you will be accusing them of helping albanians spread their propaganda.
why you want so much to know what B92 thinks on the matter?
I think you want to make b92 to take openly sides.
I hope b92 has already given you the answer here, but lets see.
I like your sense of humor (comment #1). I also like the name of that other guy, called Jugoslav. Do you know anything about him?
It would be interesting to see a Jugoslav as head of Serbia.
When I click on article about Croat Mesic remarks about Kosovo totally unrelated article about Ilic appears. I would actually like to see more remarks about Mesic's article-why did it diappeared?
Very interesting article from Mr Mesic who seems to know history of Serbia but not the history of his own country of Croatia.
Doni, A name is a matter of FACT not wishful thinking. My point is (and I obviously have to spell it out to you) is that you cannot change facts. If you are writing in Albanian and there is an Albanian name for Kosovo then I can understand the distortion.
The matter of status is pending so we can debate that. I am also not trying to sway B92 to back a side at all. I am reminding B92 of their own regulations which are, that no inflamatory material will be published.
Now since Kosovo is written as Kosova by the Albanian camp only to irritate and disrespect the sovereign country to which it belongs, naturally a normal question to ask would be Why?
Again, I was not expecting an answer from B92. The reason for my objection being published is enough. I fully understand that B92 does not get involved in debating anything with their readers but only reply when there is a problem with a site or similar.
IMAGE SOURCE
12 Komentari
Sortiraj po: