UNMIK: Kosovo office breaches Resolution 1244

"does not envisage Serbia opening a representative office in Kosovo."

- but as the spokesman is only too aware neither does it suggest it can't open offices and thus it really can't suggest it breaches 1244!

However, 1244 is very specific on Serbia's sovereignity which it does re-affirm! I am glad that this will be discussed in the UN SC - clarity is something that UNMIK administrators must be given seeing as they think 1244 means carte blance their own interpretation based on thier bias!

Mr. Ivanko... Kosovo is serbian territory...just like it is reaffirmed in UNSC 1244!

how is it to step before some microphones and talk such a nonsense...and to know it at the same time?

Serbia does not need permision from anyone to open the office in its teritory. The UNMIK staff really have problem to understand this or they have dificulties with interpretation of resolution 1244. Perhaps they can explain which paragraph says that SErbia has no right to make such moves. And yet Ivanko says that security situation is satisfactory. Only satisfactory says to me that security is just not promising at all.

Well just do away with 1244 leave kosovo with Serbia bring serbia into EU case closed you guys argue more that bunch a women at a tea paryt

1244 also recognized the territorial integrity of Serbia and the right of return for some members of the Serbian police after a period of time. This is calling one side in breach of an agreement when the other side has already breached it by offering to ignore 1244. Talk about the pot calling tea kettle black.

"Just a reminder to all the Serbian panel. The Yugoslavia doesn't exist anymore. FULL STOP. If you want to re-make you can try....it might work)))))
(EA, 15 December 2007 13:59)"

EA...how long will it take until you understand the meaning of "legal succession"?

go back to older articles and read the comments. perhaps you will learn somthing there...

Just a reminder to all the Serbian panel. The Yugoslavia doesn't exist anymore. FULL STOP. If you want to re-make you can try....it might work)))))

When it suits Serbia to break the International law....what is wrong with that))

When it suits Serbia to break the International law....what is wrong with that))
(EA, 15 December 2007 10:41)

I think the fact that Serb troops are not in Kosovo to protect minorities and patrimonial sites is a direct violation of 1244, I also believe that the PISG about to declare independence unilaterally,and without legal standing is also in direct violation of 1244. I also believe that the privatization and the roadblocks of Serb returnees to their homes, as well as proper protection of their holy sites as direct violation to 1244.

I spent 22 months in Kosovo with the US KFOR

When it suits Serbia to break the International law....what is wrong with that))

Just a reminder to all the Serbian panel. The Yugoslavia doesn't exist anymore. FULL STOP. If you want to re-make you can try....it might work)))))

"does not envisage Serbia opening a representative office in Kosovo."

- but as the spokesman is only too aware neither does it suggest it can't open offices and thus it really can't suggest it breaches 1244!

However, 1244 is very specific on Serbia's sovereignity which it does re-affirm! I am glad that this will be discussed in the UN SC - clarity is something that UNMIK administrators must be given seeing as they think 1244 means carte blance their own interpretation based on thier bias!

Mr. Ivanko... Kosovo is serbian territory...just like it is reaffirmed in UNSC 1244!

how is it to step before some microphones and talk such a nonsense...and to know it at the same time?

1244 also recognized the territorial integrity of Serbia and the right of return for some members of the Serbian police after a period of time. This is calling one side in breach of an agreement when the other side has already breached it by offering to ignore 1244. Talk about the pot calling tea kettle black.

Serbia does not need permision from anyone to open the office in its teritory. The UNMIK staff really have problem to understand this or they have dificulties with interpretation of resolution 1244. Perhaps they can explain which paragraph says that SErbia has no right to make such moves. And yet Ivanko says that security situation is satisfactory. Only satisfactory says to me that security is just not promising at all.

Well just do away with 1244 leave kosovo with Serbia bring serbia into EU case closed you guys argue more that bunch a women at a tea paryt

When it suits Serbia to break the International law....what is wrong with that))
(EA, 15 December 2007 10:41)

"Just a reminder to all the Serbian panel. The Yugoslavia doesn't exist anymore. FULL STOP. If you want to re-make you can try....it might work)))))
(EA, 15 December 2007 13:59)"

EA...how long will it take until you understand the meaning of "legal succession"?

go back to older articles and read the comments. perhaps you will learn somthing there...

I think the fact that Serb troops are not in Kosovo to protect minorities and patrimonial sites is a direct violation of 1244, I also believe that the PISG about to declare independence unilaterally,and without legal standing is also in direct violation of 1244. I also believe that the privatization and the roadblocks of Serb returnees to their homes, as well as proper protection of their holy sites as direct violation to 1244.

I spent 22 months in Kosovo with the US KFOR