Euro 2008: Serbia hails her Lisbon lions

Still in with a good chance and so long as the ball starts hitting the back of the net more frequently then of late theres every chance Serbia will get through.

Well, yes, Scottish victory was sensational, especially when one considers it was an away match (I hope the City of Light is in the condition of two days ago, knowing that the Tartan Army can get a bit wanton, a thing that might have been kept at bay by the beer price in the capital of France) and that it happened for the second time in the last 12 or so months. While Serbian match...well, that was a miracle as well. Serbian squad have to thank to their Portuguese colleagues who played really bad in the second half and the ref who didn`t see the clear offside (I wonder why nobody has mentioned that here in Serbia. We cannot whine any more that refs, UEFA and the rest of the world are always against us.) Anyway, they have a lot of reasons to fear for the possibility of eating Mozartkugeln and fondue in the countries of their origin next summer since Armenia, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan have always been tricky opponents (look at the first leg matches). Good luck, White Eagles (and the Flowers of Scotland)!

the reason why the offside isnt mentioned is because it was a passive offside, it hit a portugese player and thus is deemed legal.

Sigh , so many people don't know what is an offside ! The reason it isn't mentioned is because it WAS NOT an offside . Most impartial news articles on the internet will tell you that replay shows the goal was GOOD . If you replay the video , you will see that when the ball was struck the Serbian scorer was clearly ON-SIDE . Afterwards it was deflected by Portuguese player so our scorer REMAINED ON-SIDE . This is clear-cut . What is the matter with some of you people ? You just automatically believe any rumour and speculation you hear . Look at the video yourself . The goal is GOOD.

Still in with a good chance and so long as the ball starts hitting the back of the net more frequently then of late theres every chance Serbia will get through.

Well, yes, Scottish victory was sensational, especially when one considers it was an away match (I hope the City of Light is in the condition of two days ago, knowing that the Tartan Army can get a bit wanton, a thing that might have been kept at bay by the beer price in the capital of France) and that it happened for the second time in the last 12 or so months. While Serbian match...well, that was a miracle as well. Serbian squad have to thank to their Portuguese colleagues who played really bad in the second half and the ref who didn`t see the clear offside (I wonder why nobody has mentioned that here in Serbia. We cannot whine any more that refs, UEFA and the rest of the world are always against us.) Anyway, they have a lot of reasons to fear for the possibility of eating Mozartkugeln and fondue in the countries of their origin next summer since Armenia, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan have always been tricky opponents (look at the first leg matches). Good luck, White Eagles (and the Flowers of Scotland)!

the reason why the offside isnt mentioned is because it was a passive offside, it hit a portugese player and thus is deemed legal.

Sigh , so many people don't know what is an offside ! The reason it isn't mentioned is because it WAS NOT an offside . Most impartial news articles on the internet will tell you that replay shows the goal was GOOD . If you replay the video , you will see that when the ball was struck the Serbian scorer was clearly ON-SIDE . Afterwards it was deflected by Portuguese player so our scorer REMAINED ON-SIDE . This is clear-cut . What is the matter with some of you people ? You just automatically believe any rumour and speculation you hear . Look at the video yourself . The goal is GOOD.