Highway deal taken to Supreme Court

Let us hear and see first before we decide to throw the baby with the bath water.
BTW, although the Constitution is the supreme governing Act – this applies ONLY until the contract is signed.
If it turns the entire deal is signed putting Serbian resources/ interests at disadvantage, there are only two solutions:
1. Cancel the contract, pay the penalties and deal with the consequences of delay and the image of BBB- place to do business… or
2. Honor the contract, eat the cost and act upon lessons learned from this fiasco (even considering busting Serbian negotiation team with more skills, knowledge and integrity in the future)…
This is as far as the business options go.
If however, there is nothing wrong with the way this deal was negotiated and signed ( or at east is still within GABP*) – stop bikering and get the d**n business started and done.

The debate (although appalling one) on Constitution – transparency – Supreme Court – various ministers … is different in scope, purpose and extends and is geared more towards tug-of-power on the political scene in Serbia.

*Generally Accepted Business Practice(s) - a definition for all its intended purpose

In Milosevic's time, Serbia would have chosen more Serbian construction companies instead of foreign ones.

Obviously he doesn't want people to see how much money he robbed stole and cheated the Serbian people out of.

Business in Serbia is awful and the courts are a disgrace. It is easy to bribe a judge, that's the problem.

# Business in Serbia is awful and the courts are a disgrace. It is easy to bribe a judge, that's the problem.
(Lazar, 16. August 2007 21:02)

That's called corruption. The higher the corruption is [in society] the worse.

Obviously he doesn't want people to see how much money he robbed stole and cheated the Serbian people out of.

Let us hear and see first before we decide to throw the baby with the bath water.
BTW, although the Constitution is the supreme governing Act – this applies ONLY until the contract is signed.
If it turns the entire deal is signed putting Serbian resources/ interests at disadvantage, there are only two solutions:
1. Cancel the contract, pay the penalties and deal with the consequences of delay and the image of BBB- place to do business… or
2. Honor the contract, eat the cost and act upon lessons learned from this fiasco (even considering busting Serbian negotiation team with more skills, knowledge and integrity in the future)…
This is as far as the business options go.
If however, there is nothing wrong with the way this deal was negotiated and signed ( or at east is still within GABP*) – stop bikering and get the d**n business started and done.

The debate (although appalling one) on Constitution – transparency – Supreme Court – various ministers … is different in scope, purpose and extends and is geared more towards tug-of-power on the political scene in Serbia.

*Generally Accepted Business Practice(s) - a definition for all its intended purpose

Business in Serbia is awful and the courts are a disgrace. It is easy to bribe a judge, that's the problem.

# Business in Serbia is awful and the courts are a disgrace. It is easy to bribe a judge, that's the problem.
(Lazar, 16. August 2007 21:02)

That's called corruption. The higher the corruption is [in society] the worse.

In Milosevic's time, Serbia would have chosen more Serbian construction companies instead of foreign ones.