Toni
pre 17 godina
Mr. Davies,
Unless you’ve been yourself there and witnessed the atrocities committed in Racak, then my case stands, for the lack of your ability to disproving it in the slightest. There were three teams sent to investigate the case – Russian, Belarusian, and Finnish. I am no forensic expert, so I won’t pretend know anything more than I do nor to prove anything scientifically. BUT, I value Finland’s team report much more than the former Soviet countries, for the simple fact of their strong pro-Serbian bias. Finland has had absolutely no historical amicable ties with Albanians that I am aware of – so whatever their conclusion on the matter, I would trust it much more than others, given their neutrality.
Now that I’ve iterated at which study I am going with, let me elaborate. As you can read here (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/298131.stm), Dr. Ranta does indeed affirm that they were civilians, since any proof to the contrary doesn’t exist. Just because someone is of “fighting” age, doesn’t automatically make them guilty of firing a gun, much less partaking in a gunfight. I value her expert opinion on the matter much more than yours or the Russian and Belarusian.
For the sake of the argument, let’s say that they indeed were firing at the police units, and that they got shot back by a superior power. But if they were indeed shot in a firefight, wouldn’t a normal procedure, in any contemporary police force, be to surround the area to protect it from contamination and have forensics personnel come to the area and investigate the surrounding and inspect the bodies (or something along those lines)? Does massacring and mutilating forty plus people sound like a right police procedure to follow in any decent modern police force? I hope that that is not Milosevic’s propaganda Kool-Aid I am sensing in your argument … if you do have counter arguments with some facts, please share – if I am wrong, I would want to be corrected.
Take care.
14 Komentari
Sortiraj po: