Ok, yeah, we blame Serbia more than we blame Croatia. But why not, do your research people, you'll see that the Serbs did worse things then the Croats.
"Some reports suggested that the court might rule that genocide took place in Srebrenica only, seeking Serbia’s responsibility for the crime in its perceived unwillingness to arrest and bring the perpetrators to justice."
This is a very interesting point because it presumes the guilt of an individual such as Mladic and/or Karadzic. A very weak concept if you ask me as the trial was not against them rather it was against a state. As such the judges are in no legal position to proclaim a verdict against individuals. Remember Mladic and Karadzic have been indicted and not convicted. I am just pointing out a glaring weakness in this line of reasoning, I am not stating either way if anyone is guilty of genocide or not, as it is not my place to do so.
what about Croatia oh they didn't do any war crimes and Bosniaks all you do is one sided only Serbs did war crimes and you let the others out of jail from Bosnia and Croatia that's nonsense already i hope the Serbs don't give anymore of these so called war criminals since the Hague is only after Serbs
what about Croatia oh they didn't do any war crimes and Bosniaks all you do is one sided only Serbs did war crimes and you let the others out of jail from Bosnia and Croatia that's nonsense already i hope the Serbs don't give anymore of these so called war criminals since the Hague is only after Serbs
"Some reports suggested that the court might rule that genocide took place in Srebrenica only, seeking Serbia’s responsibility for the crime in its perceived unwillingness to arrest and bring the perpetrators to justice."
This is a very interesting point because it presumes the guilt of an individual such as Mladic and/or Karadzic. A very weak concept if you ask me as the trial was not against them rather it was against a state. As such the judges are in no legal position to proclaim a verdict against individuals. Remember Mladic and Karadzic have been indicted and not convicted. I am just pointing out a glaring weakness in this line of reasoning, I am not stating either way if anyone is guilty of genocide or not, as it is not my place to do so.
Ok, yeah, we blame Serbia more than we blame Croatia. But why not, do your research people, you'll see that the Serbs did worse things then the Croats.
what about Croatia oh they didn't do any war crimes and Bosniaks all you do is one sided only Serbs did war crimes and you let the others out of jail from Bosnia and Croatia that's nonsense already i hope the Serbs don't give anymore of these so called war criminals since the Hague is only after Serbs
"Some reports suggested that the court might rule that genocide took place in Srebrenica only, seeking Serbia’s responsibility for the crime in its perceived unwillingness to arrest and bring the perpetrators to justice."
This is a very interesting point because it presumes the guilt of an individual such as Mladic and/or Karadzic. A very weak concept if you ask me as the trial was not against them rather it was against a state. As such the judges are in no legal position to proclaim a verdict against individuals. Remember Mladic and Karadzic have been indicted and not convicted. I am just pointing out a glaring weakness in this line of reasoning, I am not stating either way if anyone is guilty of genocide or not, as it is not my place to do so.
Ok, yeah, we blame Serbia more than we blame Croatia. But why not, do your research people, you'll see that the Serbs did worse things then the Croats.
IMAGE SOURCE
4 Komentari
Sortiraj po: